Early Christian perspectives on sin, as examined in this article, contrast with Pauline and Augustinian views. The Apostolic Fathers believed sin was acquired through personal choices rather than being an inherent condition. They emphasized human reason and moral effort to overcome sin, differing significantly from the idea of inherent sinfulness and helplessness. This analysis highlights the early Christian focus on ethical humanism and rationalism in addressing sin.
Christianity in its early centuries was marked by a remarkable diversity of beliefs and practices. Competing sects, such as the Marcionites and Gnostics, presented various theological perspectives. This article explores the theological diversity and the contested nature of early Christian beliefs, questioning which version, if any, can be considered the true Christianity.
It is well known that the Gospel of Mark contains numerous geographical errors. This is summed up in Kümmel’s classic,…
In Matthew 2:14, we are told that Joseph took Mary and Jesus to Egypt : “When he arose, he took the…
Christians believe that Paul of Tarsus is the ‘Apostle’ of Jesus(P), whom he met in a vision on his journey to Damascus. Paul is also claimed to be the author of the Epistles to the Romans, 1 and 2 Corinthians, Galatians, Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, 1 and 2 Thessalonians, 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, Philemon and Hebrews. It is therefore strange that this self-confessed ‘Apostle’ of Jesus Christ fails to pay more attention to the words of Jesus (P) himself in his epistles. To what extent has the Pauline letters shaped the selection of the gospels of the New Testament as canon today ? This article will examine the evidence and present its conclusions on the matter, insha’allah.