Prophet Muhammad’s integrity has often been targeted by misconceptions, including the false claim that he died due to divine retribution for lying, based on misinterpretations of Surah al-Haqqah (69:44 – 46). This article refutes this baseless allegation through a detailed analysis of Quranic verses, hadith, and historical context, affirming his steadfast honesty and prophetic mission.
This article critiques Samuel Green’s views on Biblical criticisms, emphasizing authenticity and preservation. It analyzes and compares the integrity of the Bible and the Qur’an’s role as the divine revelation’s guardian, examining textual variants, historical context, and ethical implications for a comprehensive and analytical perspective.
In the face of Christian polemics, a critical exploration into Islamic teachings offers a pathway to uncovering the true essence of Prophet Muhammad’s message. This approach reveals the depth, compassion, and wisdom of Islam, contrasting sharply with misconceptions. Embark on a journey to challenge narratives, seek authenticity, and illuminate the profound principles of Islam.
Occasionally, we come across Christians face-to-face and, more frequently, on the Internet, who, when informed that the text of the gospels underwent corruption during their transmission, often react with the following type of questions : “When ? Who did the corruption ? In what country ? Before or after Muhammad ? Why was it done ? How come no one noticed it?” These type of seemingly “innocent” questions merely reveal the incalculably colossal ignorance of the person in question.
In a recent article in The Spectator magazine in the UK, the evangelical leader Patrick Sookhdeo takes a swipe at Muslims and their religion. Does his case stand up to scrutiny ? Patrick Sookhdeo’s article (July 30, 2005) in London’s The Spectator, “The Myth of a Moderate Islam” reflects a dangerous trend in the war on terror. Under the guise of informing Westerners about Islam, he is in fact spreading the very same disinformation that anti-Islamic polemics have been based upon for over 1,000 years. This plays directly into the hands of Osama bin Laden, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and others, for it encourages the “clash of civilizations” they so appallingly desire. It is indeed of the utmost importance that we learn more about Islam and fight the scourge of extremism with all the tools possible. But Sookhdeo and those like him corrupt this process, seeking to advance their own agenda by turning the war on terror into an ideological war against Islam.