The Soul of Hajj

Dr. Habib Siddiqui

Hajj: Reflection on Its Rituals

No annu­al event on the face of the globe, reli­gious or non-reli­gious, com­pares to hajj in terms of the sheer num­ber of par­tic­i­pants, dura­tion of the event and the breadth of agen­da. In spite of this fact, it has always remained equal­ly fas­ci­nat­ing and mys­te­ri­ous to not only non-Mus­lims, who are barred from enter­ing the holy city, but also to mil­lions of Mus­lims, who had not per­formed hajj.

What then is hajj ? In essence, hajj is man’s evo­lu­tion toward Allah ; his return to Him. It is a sym­bol­ic demon­stra­tion of the phi­los­o­phy of cre­ation of Adam (AS : alay­his salam), the first man. To fur­ther illus­trate this, it may be stat­ed that the per­for­mance of hajj is a simul­ta­ne­ous show or exhib­it of many things. It is a show of cre­ation. It is a show of his­to­ry. It is a show of uni­ty. It is a show of Islam­ic ide­ol­o­gy. It is a show of Ummah, the com­mu­ni­ty of Mus­lims. That is why, it is said in the Qur’an :

And pro­claim unto mankind the hajj …. That they may wit­ness things that are of ben­e­fit to them.“Qur’an, 22 : 27 – 8

Just as in any oth­er good show or movie or the­atre-play, the fol­low­ing con­di­tions pre­vail in hajj. Allah is the Stage Man­ag­er. The theme por­trayed is the actions of these main char­ac­ters –- Adam, Haw’a (Eve), Ibrahim (Abra­ham), Hajar (Hagar), Isma’il (AS), and Shay­tan (Satan). The main scenes are –- Masjid al-Haram, Arafat, Mas’a (space between the moun­tains -– Safa and Mar­wa), Mash’ar (area between Arafat and Mina) and Mina. Impor­tant sym­bols are –- Ka’ba, Safa, Mar­wa, day, night, sun­shine, sun­set, idols and rit­u­als of sac­ri­fice. The dress and make-up are –- Ihram, halq and taqseer (part of cer­e­monies of hajj involv­ing cut­ting of hair and nails, afterward).

Last­ly, the play­er of the show is –- you –- the Hajji. You are the main fea­ture of the per­for­mance. The role of Adam, Ibrahim, Isma’il (Ish­mael) and Hajar in con­fronta­tion between Allah and Satan is all played by you. As a result, you are the hero of the show !

Hajj is a duty unto Allah for mankind, for him or her who can find a way or means to get there (Qur’an 3:97). It is not a tax on your wealth, but a duty. Thus, to qual­i­fy, you must be sane and wise to under­stand what you are get­ting into, and able-bod­ied to go through this task, and last­ly, have the means or resources to per­form hajj.

The rites of hajj are five – (1) Ihram, (2) wait­ing at Arafat, (3) Tawaf of the Ka’ba, (4) sa’iy or run­ning between the Safa and the Mar­wa and (5) cut­ting or trim­ming of hair. Oth­ers are not pil­lars, although some may require kaf­fara or penal­ty, if not done. The per­son who puts on the Ihram or cloth for either Umrah (less­er pil­grim­age) or hajj (greater pil­grim­age) is called a Muhrim.

The months of hajj are the three. These are the Ara­bic months of Shaww­al, Dhul-Qadah and first ten days of Dhul Hij­jah. Thus, one can­not put on Ihram before Shaww­al. Hajj and Umrah are per­formed in three ways –- ifrad, tamat­tu and qiran.

1. Ifrad involves first per­form­ing hajj and then Umrah.
2. Tamat­tu is when one first per­forms Umrah and then hajj, both in the same year with some break in between the two.
3. Qiran is when one puts on the Ihram with the inten­tion of com­bin­ing both hajj and Umrah with­out any break in between the two.

There are ten eti­quettes of hajj. These are :

    1. Requite all wrong­do­ings and sat­is­fy all adversaries.
    2. Make pro­vi­sion for hajj from one’s law­ful wealth.
    3. Learn the pil­lars of hajj and its ceremonies.
    4. Be kind and for­bear­ing with oth­ers, lest the reward be nullified.
    5. Observe the oblig­a­tions of prayers and its statutes.
    6. Be open-hand­ed, main­tain the poor and spend as much as he/​she is able to.
    7. At the sta­tion of Arafat, remem­ber the Day of Judg­ment (Yawmil Qiamat).
    8. Should not miss vis­i­ta­tion of the Prophet’s (S) grave in Madinah.
    9. After return from hajj, one should turn toward Akhi­rat (Here­after).
    10. One should remem­ber his par­ents and oth­er close rel­a­tives who have passed away with pious prayers and make-up for them if they could not ful­fill their oblig­a­tions for hajj.

The steps of hajj are the following :

Miqat -– putting on Ihram at des­ig­nat­ed places with wudhu.

The show of hajj begins with Miqat. At this point, the par­tic­i­pant must change his/​her clothes. Clothes show indi­vid­u­al­i­ty, sta­tus, pref­er­ence and dis­tinc­tion. They cre­ate super­fi­cial bar­ri­ers that sep­a­rate man from man. The con­cept of I” (and not We”) emerges which gives birth to dis­crim­i­na­tion. At Miqat you assume your orig­i­nal shape as a man”, just one of chil­dren of Adam” who will die one day. The cloth of Ihram is, there­fore, the anti-the­sis to that indi­vid­u­al­ism”, it is the kafan (or bur­ial shroud). You wear the kafan, the two pieces of cloth, just like every­one else. You join the mass, the mul­ti­tude and become noth­ing or just a drop of water in the ocean that has no spe­cial iden­ti­ty of its own. An atmos­phere of gen­uine uni­ty pre­vails every­where. It is a human show of Islam­ic uni­ty, it is a show of uni­ver­sal broth­er­hood. The bod­ies were left in Miqat and the souls are moti­vat­ed here. This is the begin­ning of your jour­ney, your voy­age to noth­ing­ness. There is no sex, no per­fume, no shoes, no sewn clothes and head cov­ers for men, no face mask, no cut­ting of hair or nails, i.e., absolute­ly no signs of aris­toc­ra­cy or dis­tinc­tion. In the state of Muhrim, you don’t even look in a mir­ror to see your own image. You don’t hunt any ani­mal, you don’t uproot any plant. So you kill the ten­den­cies of aggres­sion by being peace­ful to nature. You cease to remain or behave as some­body. Hajj is a move­ment to return­ing to Allah, just as Allah says in the Qur’an : Wa ilal-lahil maseer (24:42), mean­ing, Unto Allah is the jour­ney­ing.” All your self­ish egos must be buried at Miqat. You wit­ness your own dead body and vis­it your own grave. By sac­ri­fic­ing your indi­vid­u­al­i­ty, you focus on real­i­ty, the basic pur­pose for which you were cre­at­ed — that being a slave unto Allah. Just as when you would be buried in two pieces of cloth, leav­ing behind all your wealth and world­ly belong­ings, here in Miqat you prac­tice a dress rehearsal for that inevitable event.

It is prefer­able that you enter Makkah dur­ing the daytime.

Each step you take toward Ka’ba, your heart pounds. The weight of being close to Allah’s house seems to get heav­ier and heav­ier. You are endowed with a mixed feel­ing of love and fear. Love, because you have wait­ed this long to get here. Fear, because you don’t know whether you can endure the strain of rit­u­als of hajj, ful­fill your duty unto Allah and be born again as an inno­cent human being.

Make du’a (sup­pli­ca­tion) for Ka’ba upon see­ing it.

Remem­ber this is the Baital Haram -– the Sacred House — appoint­ed by Allah (Qur’an 5:97). This is the first house of wor­ship on the face of the globe. It is to this house that you face while pray­ing. It is also the direc­tion in which your face would be turned when you are buried as dead. It is the cen­ter of exis­tence, faith, love, uni­ty and life. It has its own his­to­ry. It is called Baitil Masabatal-lin-nass wa amana, i.e., the House of resort for mankind and a sanc­tu­ary (Qur’an 2:125). It is also called Bait­ul Atiq -– the Ancient House –- in the Qur’an (22:29). Ibrahim (AS) prayed for its secu­ri­ty and blessings.

You per­form Tawaf (cir­cum­am­bu­la­tion) of Ka’ba sev­en times, unless it is time for a reg­u­lar prayer led by an Imam, which you need to join in.

Just as plan­ets of our solar sys­tem orbit around the sun, you orbit around the world’s sun — the Ka’ba, and become part of a uni­ver­sal sys­tem. You demon­strate your love for Allah by mak­ing Tawaf around His house. Tawaf should be start­ed from the cor­ner stone -– the Black Stone, Hajr al-Aswad — with Ka’ba on the left. This is where you make a con­tract to join all the tribes of the earth, and become like a drop of water enter­ing the ocean. The moment of truth has come and you must select your path, dis­tinct from those who had reject­ed their Cre­ator. Three of the sev­en Tawafs must be at a faster pace than nor­mal walk­ing. You should try to touch the stone with hand, and put your fore­head on it and then kiss it. By touch­ing the stone, you have shown your alle­giance to your Cre­ator, who had sent this very stone from the heav­en, so that He could know your love for Him. By touch­ing the stone, you have cut off all forms of alle­giance to any­thing oth­er than Allah, you have become free again from servi­tude of men and this world. Dur­ing Tawaf, you become part of the cos­mos. You for­get about your­self. You are in love with the sym­bol of uni­ty and servi­tude to Allah. You see noth­ing but His sym­bols, the Ka’ba and the Black Stone, Hajr al-Aswad. By deny­ing your­self you have become a lover of Him just like Hajar who migrat­ed to this land, bar­ren and rugged, with­out veg­e­ta­tion, with­out any forms of sub­sis­tence, but with com­plete reliance in Her Lord, Allah (T). And Allah did not neglect either her or her infant son. He brought out the Zamzam well and let peo­ple set­tle there, mak­ing it the most impor­tant place in the Ara­bi­an penin­su­la. Remem­ber that some rit­u­als of hajj are, in real­i­ty, a mem­o­ry of Hajar. Hijrah or migra­tion is what Hajar did. Any migra­tion like hers is a move toward civilization.

Dur­ing Tawaf, every­one encir­cles the Ka’ba col­lec­tive­ly. The move­ment is of one unit and there is no indi­vid­ual iden­ti­fi­ca­tion of men or women, black or white, red or yel­low. The move­ment has trans­formed one per­son into the total­i­ty of a peo­ple”. All of the I’s” have trans­formed into We,” estab­lish­ing the uni­ver­sal­i­ty of ummah with the goal of approach­ing Allah. Like­wise, all your self-cen­tered­ness must go and trans­form into self-denial or ummah-cen­tered activ­i­ties. Allah’s way is the way of the peo­ple. In oth­er words, to approach Allah, you must first approach peo­ple. That is why, indi­vid­ual activ­i­ties in Islam are less mer­i­to­ri­ous than col­lec­tive actions. You step out of the Tawaf cycle at the same place you start­ed after com­ple­tion of the sev­en orbits. This is just like being res­ur­rect­ed from the same spot where you would be buried.

After Tawaf, per­form two rakah of prayer behind Maqam‑e Ibrahim in which you pray Surah al-Kafirun in the first rakat and Surah al-Ikhlas in the second.

Maqam is a very blessed place for pray­ingQur’an, 2:125. It is the near­est point to Allah. As a mat­ter of fact, there is no place in this entire earth where you get more reward than this place for pray­ing. The stone has the foot­print of Ibrahim (AS), the rebel against the estab­lished despot of his time, Nim­rod. He stood over this stone to lay the cor­ner stone — Hajr al-Aswad and to re-con­struct the Ka’ba and to prayQuran, 2:125. Do you now under­stand where you are stand­ing ? By stand­ing on the same stone, you vow to become like Ibrahim Han­i­fah wa Khalil-Allah, the upright friend of Allah, who was uncom­pro­mis­ing in his con­vic­tion of Tawhid. In Maqam, sym­bol­i­cal­ly, you shake hands with Ibrahim (AS) by pledg­ing the same ded­i­ca­tion to Allah -– i.e., to be like Ibrahim and Isma’il (AS), his son.

Run between the moun­tains — Safa and Mar­wa — sev­en times, start­ing with the Safa and end­ing with the Marwa.

This is called Sa’iy. Lit­er­al­ly it means search, a move­ment with an aim. It is depict­ed by run­ning and hur­ry­ing. Here you act like Hajar, the moth­er of infant Isma’il. She had no food, no water, no shel­ter, nei­ther for her­self nor for her child, but only uncom­pro­mis­ing, relent­less faith that the God of Ibrahim (AS) will not leave her and her only son with­out sus­te­nance. Remem­ber, when Ibrahim (AS) left her and their only son, Isma’il (AS) near the val­ley of Makkah, Hajar asked him : O Ibrahim, where are you leav­ing us, while there is no habi­ta­tion of men nor any pro­vi­sion for food and drink ? Who is going to look after us?” Ibrahim (AS) replied, Ilal-lah (to Allah’s pro­tec­tion only).” She said, Radi­tu bil­lah (I am ful­ly sat­is­fied with Allah?” She also asked, Have you done this to ful­fill Allah’s com­mand?” When Ibrahim (AS) con­firmed that by say­ing, Yes,” she sim­ply said, Well in that case, we have no fear, for Allah will not let us die with­out pro­vid­ing any pro­vi­sion [i.e., He will def­i­nite­ly pro­vide for us in the mid­dle of this des­o­late, bar­ren desert].” [Bukhari] Do you see the strength of her trust in Allah ? Away from the view of his wife and son, Ibrahim (AS) prayed, Our Lord : Lo ! I have set­tled some of my pos­ter­i­ty in an uncul­tivable val­ley near unto Thy Holy House (Ka’ba), Our Lord ! that they may estab­lish prop­er wor­ship. So, incline some hearts of men that they may yearn toward them, and You pro­vide them with fruits in order that they may be thank­ful.” (Qur’an 14 : 37). Soon, how­ev­er, Hajar’s water and food were all gone, there was no milk or water or any food either for her­self or for her child. She start­ed look­ing out for water, run­ning to the top of the moun­tain, Safa. No, there is no water any­where. Then she comes down and looks at her infant to check if he is fine. She then goes to the top of the oth­er moun­tain, Mar­wa, and takes a deep long look to fetch water. She was search­ing water, why ? Because it is need­ed for phys­i­cal sal­va­tion, for life to con­tin­ue. So, should man work for liveli­hood, trust­ing in Allah. She search­es again and again. After run­ning sev­en times between these two moun­tains, she comes down from Mar­wa to see the con­di­tion of her infant son. She hears the sound of gush­ing water com­ing from near her son and is sur­prised to see an angel (Jib­ril) dig a well near the heel of her infant son. The gush­ing water from the well was mak­ing all that sound. She quick­ly puts a bar­ri­er around it so that water could be stored and that it did not over­flow. And this well came to be known as the Zamzam. Muham­mad (S) said, May Allah bless the moth­er of Isma’il (AS). If she had not put that bar­ri­er around the Zamzam, instead of a well, the gush­ing water would have con­tin­ued to flow like a spring [and flood­ed the entire val­ley].” It was a gift from Allah to the moth­er and son, and all those who came lat­er. It is a min­er­al water rich with nutri­tion­al and med­i­c­i­nal pow­er to cure man of many dis­eases. The Safa and the Mar­wa, thus, became among the signs, indi­ca­tions of Allah (Qur’an 2:158).

On the sev­enth day of Dhul-Hij­jah, after the Zuhr prayer, Imam explains the mean­ing of hajj and exhorts peo­ple to go to the val­ley of Mina (near­ly six miles north of Makkah) next morn­ing after Fajr prayer.

Vis­it and stay at Mina on the eighth day (after arriv­ing there in the morn­ing) till the next Fajr (dawn prayer).

Go to Arafat after sun has risen on the ninth, stop­ping on the way at Nami­rah and lis­ten­ing to khut­bah before Zuhr (mid-day prayer).

Pro­ceed to Arafat (five miles fur­ther north) and seek Allah’s for­give­ness there till Maghrib (prayer after sunset).

Arafat lit­er­al­ly means knowl­edge and sci­ence. Arafat rep­re­sents the begin­ning of man’s cre­ation, that of our fore­fa­ther Adam. It was shay­tan who mis­led our fore­fa­ther by whis­per­ing to him say­ing : O Adam ! Shall I show you the tree of immor­tal­i­ty and pow­er that wastes not away?” (Qur’an 20:120) He caused the down­fall of Adam and Haw’a (Eve). For years, they were sep­a­rat­ed from each oth­er hav­ing descend­ed at dif­fer­ent places. It was in Arafat that they met again. It was in a small rocky hill of Jabal al-Rah­ma in the cen­ter of Arafat that their sins were for­giv­en by Allah. So, here in Arafat, you act like Adam (AS) or Haw’a and seek for­give­ness for you and your loved ones.

After sun­set pro­ceed slow­ly to Muz­dal­i­fah (halfway between Arafat and Mina) with­out pray­ing (Qur’an 2:198). How­ev­er, the Imams Abu Han­i­fah and Sufyan al-Thawri (R) said it is per­mis­si­ble to pray Maghrib before reach­ing Muzdalifah.

Spend the night before Eid in Muz­dal­i­fah. Pray Fajr ear­ly. Col­lect peb­bles there (70 per person).

Muz­dal­i­fah is part of Mash’ar-ul-Haram. Our Prophet Muham­mad (S) prayed for long dura­tion here. You must be in Mash’ar by the night­fall (while you were at Arafat dur­ing the day). Dark­ness engulfs you in Mash’ar. Arafat is knowl­edge, it requires day­light for clear vision. Mash’ar lit­er­al­ly means con­scious­ness and under­stand­ing. Such blos­som at night through deep reflec­tion or med­i­ta­tion. So, Mash’ar is the stage of insight while Arafat was the stage of expe­ri­ence. Intu­ition needs no light. It can see in the dark­ness. It is the stage between knowl­edge and love, or Arafat and Mina. Here you reflect upon your­self and strength­en your spir­it. Are you not in the right way ? Are you ready to fight against Satan or his insin­u­a­tions ? In Makkah, dur­ing tawaf you joined the crowd and became part of them. Here you are alone, despite being with­in a crowd. Here you are for your­self only. There­fore, con­fess your sins to Allah. And this night is a good cov­er for your tears. Take prepa­ra­tion for tomor­row by get­ting ready tonight. There is a great bat­tle in which you have to par­tic­i­pate tomor­row. So, col­lect your weapon­ry – the peb­bles — before the day breaks. The peb­bles will be used against your ene­my. You have to act like Ibrahim (AS) here just as he fought against the insin­u­a­tions of Satan on his way to sac­ri­fice his beloved son, Isma’il (AS).

Go back to Mina and throw sev­en stones at Jam­rat-ul Aqabah, recit­ing Tak­bir each time. The remain­der 63 stones should be thrown over the next three days of Ayyam al-Tashriq (11th, 12th and 13th of Dhul Hij­jah) at a rate of 21 stones per day. Every day, throw the first 7 stones at Jama­rah near Mina, and the last sev­en at Jama­rat al-Aqabah, locat­ed clos­er to Makkah.

The tenth day has arrived. This is the day for sac­ri­fice of ani­mal. You are armed with weapons to fight Satan, the ene­my of your fore­fa­ther, the dev­il who tried to con­fuse Ibrahim (AS). Mina lit­er­al­ly means love. Ibrahim (AS) felt too much love for his only son, Isma’il (AS). And Allah want­ed to test how great or how real his love was for Him. Ibrahim (AS) saw a vision of sac­ri­fic­ing his most beloved son. That was the com­mand from Allah to test Ibrahim (AS) of his love and devo­tion. Can Ibrahim (AS) pass this test ? He pon­ders on this unusu­al, rather cru­el, test. He has grown old and he has no oth­er off­spring. In his very old age, Allah has lis­tened to his prayer and has blessed him with this son through his sec­ond wife, Hajar. As a thanks­giv­ing for answer­ing to his prayer, he has named his son, Isma’ilMean­ing : God lis­tened [to my prayer].

Yet, Ibrahim (AS) was asked to set­tle Isma’il and his moth­er in the val­ley of Makkah when the child was still an infant. And now that the lad has become old enough to walk and rea­son, Allah wants him to sac­ri­fice that son to prove that his true love is only for Allah. Just pon­der on this for a momentQur’an 37:102. Don’t you get a chill in your back ? Satan tries to cre­ate doubt in his mind : O Ibrahim, are you sure you want to sac­ri­fice your son, your true love, your joy, the mean­ing of your exis­tence, the fruit of your life ; who would there be after you to wor­ship your Lord ; don’t you have heart, any soft feel­ings toward your son?’ Ibrahim (AS) is momen­tar­i­ly con­fused. Should he or shouldn’t he car­ry out Allah’s com­mand, you must sac­ri­fice your son?” Is he dream­ing or is it the real­i­ty ? No, there is no con­fu­sion what he saw in his vision is crys­tal clear ; God tru­ly wants him to sac­ri­fice his beloved Isma’il. He wins over Satan, the sneak­ing whis­per­er. But then Satan returns and tries to digress him from his task. Ibrahim (AS) wins over again. But Satan does not give up that eas­i­ly, he tries to cre­ate con­fu­sion for the third time. Ibrahim (AS) wins over Satan’s temp­ta­tions yet for the third time. He is men­tal­ly all pre­pared to car­ry out the task. His choice is obvi­ous – absolute obe­di­ence and devo­tion to Allah ; Isma’il must be sac­ri­ficed. He want­ed to share the mes­sage with his lad. Thus, he talks to his young lad, Isma’il (AS), of his dream and asks his opin­ion. And what does this gen­tle” son (whom the Qur’an calls Ghu­lamin Hal­im) reply ? He calm­ly says : O my father ! Do that which you are com­mand­ed. Allah will­ing, you shall find me of the stead­fast.”Qur’an, 37:102 He answers like the rock of Gibraltar !

What did you expect ? Did you expect the son of Ibrahim (AS), the upright, to be any less faith­ful than his father ? So, here in Mina, you act like Ibrahim (AS), the sol­dier of Tawhid (monothe­ism), ready to defeat, sub­due or shoot down your real ene­my, the Satan with­in you rep­re­sent­ing your per­son­al egos, desires, crav­ings, and pref­er­ences. These oth­er” things, the idols”, were dis­tract­ing you from the true wor­ship of God. But here in Mina, you are now ready to fight against these taghoots (demi-gods) to show your true devo­tion and obe­di­ence to Allah. You fight Satan just as Ibrahim (AS) had fought against him. To mim­ic that event, you throw stones at Satan at the three Jama­rats.

Udhiya (Qur­ban) or sac­ri­fice an ani­mal, say­ing only Bismillah.

When both the father and the son — Ibrahim and Isma’il (AS) — had sur­ren­dered to Allah and Ibrahim (AS) had flung Isma’il (AS) down upon his face and was about to put the knife on his son’s neck, Allah called Ibrahim (AS): O Ibrahim ! You have already ful­filled the vision.“Qur’an, 37:104 – 5 Ibrahim (AS) doesn’t have to sac­ri­fice his son. Instead, he should sac­ri­fice this ram, which has been sent to him, as ran­som for Isma’il (AS). Unlike the false-gods of poly­the­ism, Allah, the One True God, is not blood­thirsty. He just want­ed to check where Ibrahim (AS) stood in his devo­tion and love, whether he was capa­ble of over­com­ing his per­son­al feel­ing of love for his son to please Allah. A les­son was taught by Allah –- from now on there would be no human sac­ri­fice in the altar of God. Sac­ri­fice of a halal ani­mal whose meat you can eat and dis­trib­ute among the poor is a suf­fi­cient substitute.

Pon­der again. What was Ibrahim (AS) asked to sac­ri­fice ? It was noth­ing short of the most beloved thing/​entity among his pos­ses­sion. But when he was ready, his Isma’il was returned unto him, unscathed and unharmed. And he was made a mod­el for human­i­ty : And We left for him [Ibrahim (AS)] among the lat­er folk (the salu­ta­tion): Peace be unto Ibrahim. Thus do we reward the good.“Qur’an, 37:108 – 9 If you love some­thing more than you love Allah, then that thing has become your idol and you must be ready to sac­ri­fice that. Are you ready to slaugh­ter your world­ly desires, world­ly love, your Isma’il in Mina in order that you be free from all attach­ments save those of Allah ? If you are, then slaugh­ter a goat, sheep, ram, cow or camel as a ran­som towards your Isma’il. As Dr. Shariati right­ly puts it,

To offer a sheep instead of Isma’il is a sac­ri­fice”, but to sac­ri­fice a sheep just for the sake of sac­ri­fice is butch­ery”!Dr. Ali Shariati, Hajj : Reflec­tion on Its Rituals

For sure­ly Allah says, Their flesh and their blood do not reach Allah, but the devo­tion from you reach­es Him.”Qur’an, 22:37

Men should shave their head or trim their hair, at least, one-quar­ter of head. Women should not shave their head, but only trim slight­ly at the end of the lock of a hair.
After the Qur­ban (sac­ri­fice) of the ani­mal, you have almost com­plet­ed the basic require­ments of hajj, so you can make an end of your unkempt­nessQur’an, 22:29. You have defeat­ed Satan but you may not have suc­ceed­ed in com­plete­ly killing it. You may have defeat­ed him out­side but he comes back inside of you. So, you should stay the next three days in Mina and con­tin­ue with your bat­tling of the Satan at Jama­rat.

After shav­ing or trim­ming the hair, you should go to Makkah and make the Tawaf of vis­i­ta­tion and run sev­en times between the Safa and the Mar­wa. Then your hajj is com­plete and you can come out of Ihram.

This is the lat­ter tawaf of the Ka’baQur’an, 22:29, per­formed after you return from Mina. In Mina, you have defeat­ed Satan and renewed your ties with Allah by fol­low­ing the foot­steps of Ibrahim (AS). When you first approached Ka’ba you had not, by then, puri­fied your­self. You were still impure and uncon­scious. In Arafat you gained con­scious­ness. In Mina you puri­fied your­self. So, this is appro­pri­ate that you do the tawaf and sa’iy in the puri­fied state before you return home. Dur­ing the rit­u­als of hajj you played the roles of Ibrahim (AS) and Hajar. Do not replace your role-play­ing to some­thing else when you return. Like Hajar, always trust in Allah. Like Ibrahim (AS) fight the fire of Nim­rod, i.e., oppres­sion. Like Ibrahim (AS) be pre­pared to sac­ri­fice your Isma’il, i.e., love or desires, for the sake of your faith. That is the essence of hajj. You return to Allah the way He want­ed you to be : a slave total­ly ded­i­cat­ed to his/​her Master.

In clos­ing, let me quote from Ali bin Uth­man al-Jul­labi al Hujwiri’s (R) Kashf al-Mahjub. A cer­tain man came to Junayd [al-Bagh­da­di] (R). Junayd asked him whence he came. He replied : I have been to hajj.” Junayd (R) said : From the time when you first jour­neyed from your home have you also jour­neyed away from all sins?” He said, No.” Then,” said Junayd (R), you have made no jour­ney. At every stage where you halt­ed for the night did you tra­verse a sta­tion on the way to Allah?” He said : No.” Then,” said Junayd (R), you have not trod­den the road stage by stage. When you put on the Ihram (pilgrim’s garb) at the prop­er place did you dis­card the attrib­ut­es of human­i­ty as you cast off your ordi­nary clothes?” No.” Then you have not put on the Ihram. When you stood on Arafat did you stand one instant in con­tem­pla­tion of Allah?” No.” Then you have not stood on Arafat. When you went to Muz­dal­i­fa and achieved your desire did you renounce all sen­su­al desires?” No.” Then you have not gone to Muz­dal­i­fa. When you cir­cum­am­bu­lat­ed the Ka’ba did you behold the imma­te­r­i­al beau­ty of Allah in the abode of purifi­ca­tion?” No.” Then you have not cir­cum­am­bu­lat­ed the Ka’ba. When you ran between Safa and Mar­wa did you attain to the rank of safa (puri­ty) and muruwwat (virtue)?” No.” Then you have not run. When you came to Mina did all your wish­es cease?” No.” Then you have not yet vis­it­ed Mina. When you reached the slaugh­ter place and offered sac­ri­fice did you sac­ri­fice the objects of sen­su­al desire?” No.” Then you have not sac­ri­ficed. When you threw the stones did you throw away what­ev­er sen­su­al thoughts were accom­pa­ny­ing you?” No.” Then you have not yet thrown the stones, and you have not yet per­formed the pil­grim­age. Return and per­form the pil­grim­age in the man­ner which I have described in order that you may arrive at the sta­tion of Ibrahim (AS).”

May Allah grant us the vig­or to fol­low the dic­tates of hajj so that this duty is accept­able unto Him.

This essay is most­ly based on the book Hajj : Reflec­tion on Its Rit­u­als by Dr. Ali Shariati.Endmark


Published:

in

, ,

Author:

Tags:

Comments

12 responses to “The Soul of Hajj”

  1. Jane B. Drake Avatar

    I deeply regret sound­ing arro­gant in my pre­vi­ous posts. I believe there is no excuse for arro­gance, but per­haps I can explain it by sim­ply say­ing I have become very tired and there­fore care­less in my choice of words. I deeply regret it.

    I believe I’m tired” large­ly because it’s so hard to get peo­ple to stay on one sub­ject for even a few min­utes. I began my com­ments here by quot­ing Muham­mad’s urg­ing of believ­ers to draw no lines” between the Prophets-and I’m end­ing up read­ing the inter­est­ing – but com­plete­ly off the point – arti­cle men­tioned in the pre­vi­ous com­ment. No where in any of the three Holy Books is there any men­tion of the res­ur­rec­tion of the land the ancient Egyp­tian’s called Pales­tine.” But the res­ur­rec­tion of Israel is repeat­ed­ly men­tioned by the Prophets, and the gath­er­ing” of the Jews from all the nations where they were scat­tered.” We des­per­ate­ly need the mem­bers of all three reli­gions to alter their under­stand­ing. The Jews need to rec­og­nize the Mes­si­ah Jesus.” The Chris­tians need to rec­og­nize that the Mes­si­ah Jesus is a ser­vant of God,” as Muham­mad iden­ti­fied him, not God the Son.” And the Mus­lims need to rec­og­nize that they were nev­er meant to replace the Jews and Chris­tians, but to cor­rect the errors made by the Hebrew and Chrisit­ian cler­gies. I began this dis­cus­sion by sim­ply point­ing out that the Mus­lims could take the lead­ing role in trans­form­ing the world by believ­ing Muham­mad.” It’s evolved into an argu­ment” over mod­ern day Pales­tine, which has noth­ing to do with the Prophets.

  2. Mustafa Ali Avatar
    Mustafa Ali

    Assala­mu’a­lykum. It is ammus­ing to see such an intense and impas­sioned debate on Pales­tine and Israel under the arti­cle, The Soul of Hajj. Regard­less, it was great to observe three views on this press­ing issue. I com­mend Abdur Rah­man, Al-Qur’an wa Sun­nah, and Jane B. Drake for par­tic­i­pat­ing in such a vital dis­course. I agree most with AR and AQWS. Jane B. Drake, I believe is a gen­uine­ly good heart­ed per­son. I agree with her aspi­ra­tions of peace and mutu­al har­mo­ny. How­ev­er, I found noth­ing in the argu­ments of the oth­ers that went con­trary to her exalt­ed ideals. I do not believe any­one was advo­cat­ing vio­lence. I real­ly appre­ci­at­ed AR’s and AQWS use of sub­stan­tial his­tor­i­cal evi­dence, and their arug­ments that serve as effi­ca­cious refu­ta­tions that get at the core of the strife. I did not appre­ci­ate Jane’s arro­gance towards the infor­ma­tion, sta­tis­tics, etc… pro­vid­ed. As AQWS said, it did seem that she was being dis­mis­sive of oth­ers and mak­ing their argu­ments obso­lete.” The last com­ment by AQWS real­ly hits the heart of this alter­ca­tion. I will not pre­sume to con­tin­ue out of fear that my speech may become obso­lete” by Jane B. Drake. How­ev­er, If I am gratned per­mis­sion I wish to impart a worth­while study by Habib Sid­diqui which can be accessed at http://​www​.pales​tine​-pmc​.com/​d​e​t​a​i​l​s​.​a​s​p​?​c​a​t​=​3&​i​d​=​806. I kind­ly advise every­one to read that arti­cle and learn more about the Palestinian/​Israel con­flict. I hope we no do not have any fur­ther com­ments that lack sound evi­dence to prove an argu­ment. So if any­one is against what I have writ­ten, please take the time to read that arti­cle. Thank you for your time and patience. I pray that Allah, Lord of all that exists, grants us a solu­tion to this world dille­ma in the near future.

  3. Al-Qur'aan wa Sunnah Avatar
    Al-Qur'aan wa Sunnah

    You’re not lis­tent­ing, you nev­er have and you nev­er will. I’m sure you heard the hog­wash state­ments many times, and I’m also sure that you nev­er stud­ied the issues your­self to eval­u­ate the claims as either true or false. You just don’t want to believe it because it goes against what you stand for, uni­fied faiths for a ter­ror­ist state of Israel. All this talk about turn­ing our hearts to one anoth­er, what hap­pened to turn­ing our hearts towards inno­cent pales­tini­ans, vic­tims of a oppres­sive régime. You my friend are also inter­pret­ing your verse as you see fit. You are doing what you appar­ent­ly detest. Saddly, I am going to avoid respond­ing to you again because you are stub­born, read this— The recent esca­la­tion and cri­sis in Pales­tine, aris­ing from a dis­pro­por­tion­ate Israeli response to an Israeli sol­dier being tak­en as a hostage’ by armed Pales­tini­ans has re-focussed inter­na­tion­al atten­tion on the area, whilst par­tial­ly rel­e­gat­ing media focus on Iraq.

    The con­flict has also brought pub­lic focus again on the con­tin­ued debate over the legal­i­ty of the cre­ation and exis­tence of Israel despite the claims of efforts towards a two-state solu­tion. The pen­du­lum grav­i­tates between rejec­tion of the Israeli state, a view inter­est­ing­ly not only held by Mus­lims, but also Chris­tians and a num­ber of Jews ; and between its legit­i­ma­cy lent to it by its colo­nial cre­ators that is imposed and pro­tect­ed by region­al tyrant rulers over the Mus­lims and an ever-present Israeli military.

    60 years of exis­tence as a state has been asso­ci­at­ed with 60 years of argu­ments and strug­gle. How­ev­er, the essence of the debate has become delib­er­ate­ly lost in trans­la­tion and side-tracked by the absurd asser­tion that being anti-state of Israel and/​or anti-Zion­ist is syn­ony­mous to being anti-Jew and anti-Semit­ic. Sub­se­quent­ly, much legit­i­mate polit­i­cal debate and expres­sion has been hijacked with this false, disin­gen­u­ous, emo­tive, decep­tive and irrel­e­vant connection.

    To avoid falling into this trap and be false­ly labelled — so that we can focus on a mean­ing­ful per­spec­tive on whether the state of Israel has a right to exist, let us go direct­ly to remove the imped­i­ment and red-her­ring : The asser­tion that being anti-Israel and/​or anti-Zion­ist is syn­ony­mous to being anti-Jew and anti-Semit­ic is absurd, disin­gen­u­ous and a con­cert­ed delib­er­ate attempt to sti­fle legit­i­mate polit­i­cal views that argue the ille­git­i­ma­cy of the Israeli state and the fun­da­men­tal right to oppose it.”

    As for the core dis­cus­sion about the legit­i­ma­cy of Israel as a state, it con­nect­ed to four claims — Eth­i­cal, His­tor­i­cal, Reli­gious and Political.

    Eth­i­cal

    There is no eth­i­cal basis for the legit­i­ma­cy of Israel, since it was sim­ply uneth­i­cal and immoral to dis­place a pop­u­la­tion forcibly from their lands, con­vert­ing them to refugees with­out mean­ing, then ter­rorise them to accept the ille­gal acqui­si­tion of their lands. We would assume by the twist­ed log­ic of con­sid­er­ing it eth­i­cal to force a pop­u­la­tion to leave their homes, pos­ses­sions and lands that this would make Pres­i­dent Mugabe pol­i­cy in Zim­bab­we of forced evic­tion of whites’ accept­able ? It would also make it eth­i­cal for some­one to enter Bush’s Tex­as­’s Ranch, force him out and claim the ranch for him­self, pos­si­bly leav­ing Bush with the barn and to accept this, mak­ing the barn his home and being pre­vent­ed to take appro­pri­ate actions to claim all of the ranch back ?

    We don’t think so and doubt this would be con­sid­ered eth­i­cal and moral… and nei­ther was it evi­dent when Argenti­na sought to claim the Falk­land Islands and the British gov­ern­ment respond­ed in April 1982, under the lead­er­ship of Mar­garet Thatch­er, by fight­ing Argenti­na in the Falk­lands War to keep it under British rule. Let us also keep a per­spec­tive on this — the Falk­land Islands only has a pop­u­la­tion of 3,000 in com­par­i­son to Pales­tine which has a pop­u­la­tion 4 mil­lion (exclud­ing those forced to flee to neigh­bour­ing Jor­dan and those absorbed into Israel). Giv­en Britain’s expe­ri­ence on giv­ing Pales­tine away from her man­date to a for­eign peo­ple, why was this prece­dent not applied to the Falk­lands and the islands giv­en to Argenti­na (who have his­tor­i­cal claim to the islands)? Was this an uneth­i­cal action by the British gov­ern­ment not to give the Falk­lands Islands, like they did with Pales­tine ? Giv­en that there is dis­cus­sion amongst British politi­cians to com­mem­o­rate the Falk­lands war, clear­ly Britain does­n’t believe so. There­fore, if the British can fight to lib­er­ate a small rel­a­tive­ly insignif­i­cant island from occu­pa­tion to safe­guard its pop­u­la­tion (and com­mem­o­rate this), then why can­not the Pales­tini­ans do the same and repel the ille­gal occu­pa­tion of their lands ?

    What is uneth­i­cal is not the posi­tion of the Pales­tini­ans to strug­gle for the lib­er­a­tion of all the occu­pied lands, but the hyp­o­crit­i­cal dou­ble stan­dards of the west­ern powers.

    His­tor­i­cal

    The his­tor­i­cal argu­ment that is fre­quent­ly quot­ed is often con­nect­ed to the eth­i­cal angle. As for the his­tor­i­cal claim, it stems from the view that the ances­tors of the Jews were the first to inhab­it the plains of Pales­tine ; there­fore this grants them the right to the land. This was a sim­i­lar argu­ment, was it not, that Iraq held con­cern­ing Kuwait ? Sure­ly the colo­nial pow­ers should have sup­port­ed Iraq when it entered Kuwait in 1990 based on Iraq’s his­tor­i­cal claim (more so since Sad­dam was a west­ern agent), sim­i­lar to when they sup­port­ed the Zion­ist his­tor­i­cal claim to Israel and paved the way for the Zion­ists to achieve this aim ? On the con­trary, whilst the Pales­tini­ans were forcibly evict­ed to make way for the Zion­ist enti­ty, Iraq’s entry into Kuwait pre­cip­i­tat­ed the Gulf War. There­fore it should be not­ed that the his­tor­i­cal argu­ment is not only weak, which we will endeav­our to sum­marise lat­er, but suf­fers from the same illog­i­cal dou­ble stan­dards. For the sake of com­ple­tion of argu­ment, if one fol­lows the log­ic of this argu­ment, then the fol­low­ing exam­ples of his­tor­i­cal claims should be equal­ly applied, with equal res­o­lu­tion, force and deter­mi­na­tion to return land to its orig­i­nal inhabitants :

    a) Lands in Amer­i­ca returned to the native Indians
    When the Euro­peans land­ed, there were prob­a­bly about 10 mil­lion Indi­ans pop­u­lat­ing Amer­i­ca north of present-day Mex­i­co. It is believed that the first Indi­ans arrived dur­ing the last ice-age, approx­i­mate­ly 20,000 — 30,000 years ago. The ini­tial enthu­si­asm with which the Indi­ans greet­ed the Euro­peans soon turned to con­flict due to the Euro­pean colo­nial mate­r­i­al greed. The con­flicts led to the Indi­an Wars, the Indi­an Removal Act and oth­er acts cul­mi­nat­ing in the last major war, which was the mas­sacre in 1890 of Indi­an war­riors, women, and chil­dren at Wound­ed Knee, South Dako­ta. From a peri­od of a bru­tal pol­i­cy of forced assim­i­la­tion that last­ed until the 1960’s, aside from token ges­ture Indi­an reser­va­tions, native Indi­ans until today have been denied their right to re-pos­sess their ances­tral lands

    b) Lands in Aus­tralia returned to the native Aborigines
    From 1788, when the British offi­cial­ly land­ed, until today force (mil­i­tary and oth­er­wise) has been used to strip the native Abo­rig­i­nal peo­ple of their lands. The Abo­rig­i­nal peo­ple fought to pro­tect their lands but the British declared this con­ti­nent ter­ra nul­lius — that the land was emp­ty and belonged to no-one when they colonised it. For over 200 years the lie of ter­ra nul­lius was the cru­el and bru­tal cov­er for the mass mur­der, for the refusal to recog­nise Aus­trali­a’s indige­nous race as peo­ple, for the forced removal of chil­dren from their fam­i­lies, for the inhu­man exploita­tion of the labour of Abo­rig­i­nal peo­ple, for the racist treat­ment and apartheid Abo­rig­i­nal peo­ple have been sub­ject­ed to. Ter­ra Nul­lius was also the jus­ti­fi­ca­tion for the denial of land rights. Though in 1992, the High Court of Aus­tralia recog­nised the con­cept of Native Title, stat­ing it had exist­ed before set­tle­ment and had con­tin­ued after coloni­sa­tion. How­ev­er, the court adjudged that the Native Title was extin­guished when­ev­er land had been sold or set aside for some oth­er pur­pose. Lit­tle has changed since then.

    What we clear­ly wit­ness in the above two exam­ples is a repug­nant dis­guised pol­i­cy of dis­crim­i­na­tion, denial of land return and polit­i­cal author­i­ty upon those peo­ple with legit­i­mate his­tor­i­cal claims (except Israel, of course). There­fore, pos­sess­ing an his­tor­i­cal right car­ries nei­ther val­ue nor worth as a basis of argu­ment. So why is Israel made an excep­tion ? Clear­ly, the his­tor­i­cal argu­ments are flawed and selec­tive­ly applied — but this is typ­i­cal from an inter­na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty that is hostage to polit­i­cal expe­di­en­cy and estab­lished upon the evil ide­ol­o­gy of cap­i­tal­ism that serves the prime inter­ests of the capitalists.

    Where does this leave the Zion­ist his­tor­i­cal claim, aside from being mean­ing­less and irrel­e­vant ? A brief review on the his­to­ry of Pales­tine reveals two inter­est­ing points. First­ly, that the his­to­ry is dis­put­ed, so there is no clear proof of the Zion­ist claim any­way. Sec­ond­ly, most his­to­ri­ans con­clude the Canaan­ites were the ear­li­est known inhab­i­tants of Pales­tine (3rd mil­len­ni­um BC). The Canaan­ites were the ear­li­est known inhab­i­tants of Pales­tine (3rd mil­len­ni­um BC). Egypt was the first adja­cent pow­er to con­quer the region (3rd mil­len­ni­um BC). Dur­ing the 2nd mil­len­ni­um BC Egypt­ian hege­mo­ny and Canaan­ite auton­o­my were chal­lenged by var­i­ous invaders – and only then did the Israelites’ appear (Semit­ic tribes from Mesopotamia). There­fore, even the Zion­ist his­tor­i­cal claims are at least unproven and at best a delib­er­ate contortion.

    Reli­gious

    Polit­i­cal­ly, Pales­tine holds no sig­nif­i­cance for Jews – since like Chris­tian­i­ty, Judaism does not pos­sess nor artic­u­late a polit­i­cal struc­ture, insti­tu­tions or process­es to deal with state and society.

    How­ev­er, it is clear that Judaism has been hijacked by the Zion­ist move­ment, which has tak­en Juda­ic prin­ci­ples and ideals and fused them with­in a cap­i­tal­ist and ruth­less polit­i­cal agen­da that dreams of a greater Israel’ – whilst accord­ing to the Torah, the Jews are for­bid­den to have their own state or polit­i­cal sov­er­eign­ty while await­ing the mes­sian­ic era. To this end, the reli­gious argu­ment and jus­ti­fi­ca­tion is false and is best rep­re­sent­ed by Jews themselves.

    A num­ber of ortho­dox Jews, like the Neturei Kar­ta, state their refusal to, “…recog­nise the right of any­one to estab­lish a Jew­ish” state dur­ing the present peri­od of exile.” They oppose the, “…so-called State of Israel” not because it oper­ates sec­u­lar­ly, but because the entire con­cept of a sov­er­eign Jew­ish state is con­trary to Jew­ish Law.”

    Quot­ing the Tal­mud, Ortho­dox Jews refer to Trac­tate Kesu­b­os (p. 111a), stat­ing that it teach­es that Jews shall not use human force to bring about the estab­lish­ment of a Jew­ish state before the com­ing of the uni­ver­sal­ly accept­ed Moshi­ach (Mes­si­ah from the House of David).

    The likes of Neturei Kar­ta fur­ther aim to dis­tance Judaism from Zion­ism by stat­ing, The true Jews remain faith­ful to Jew­ish belief and are not con­t­a­m­i­nat­ed with Zion­ism.” Like­wise they, deplore the sys­tem­at­ic uproot­ing of ancient Jew­ish com­mu­ni­ties by the Zion­ists, the shed­ding of Jew­ish and non-Jew­ish blood for the sake of Zion­ist sov­er­eign­ty,” and that, The world must know that the Zion­ists have ille­git­i­mate­ly seized the name Israel and have no right to speak in the name of the Jew­ish people!”

    There­fore, we would safe­ly con­clude that there is no reli­gious basis for the exis­tence of the state of Israel. We won­der whether ortho­dox Jews who espouse these views are chas­tised, tried and impris­oned by west­ern gov­ern­ments for pro­mot­ing such views and labelled as anti-Semit­ic’ or impris­oned for hold­ing ter­ror­ist’ views on the destruc­tion of Israel ? We don’t think this is the case, since the likes of Neturei Kar­ta hold year round glob­al demon­stra­tions, includ­ing in New York and Lon­don — with plac­ards, which if held by Mus­lims – they would be instant­ly arrest­ed and tried under racial/​religious dis­crim­i­na­tion laws or some ter­ror legislation.

    Polit­i­cal

    The devel­op­ment of Pales­tine in con­tem­po­rary polit­i­cal his­to­ry has three dis­tinct peri­ods, which are : first­ly, under Islam­ic rule ; sec­ond­ly, under the British Man­date from 1922, by the League of Nations ; and final­ly under Israeli rule. With­out any shad­ow of doubt, only under the rule of Islam did the peo­ple (Mus­lims, Jews and Chris­tians) find great lev­els of secu­ri­ty, sta­bil­i­ty and ease. It is well doc­u­ment­ed, by non-Mus­lim his­to­ri­ans, that Jews sought refuge under the Islam­ic author­i­ty, the Khi­lafah, from per­se­cu­tion in Europe, par­tic­u­lar­ly the infa­mous Span­ish Inqui­si­tion in 1492.

    As for British rule, in 1922, Pales­tine was placed, by the League of Nations, under British Man­date until 1948, when the state of Israel was estab­lished. Dur­ing this man­date, all the peo­ple, par­tic­u­lar­ly the Arabs suf­fered at the hands of a dis­crim­i­na­to­ry pol­i­cy that enact­ed laws assist­ing Jew­ish immi­gra­tion to Pales­tine and acqui­si­tion of land by Jews. Dur­ing this time, the local Arab pop­u­la­tion (Mus­lims and Chris­tians), dis­mayed that they were being slow­ly swamped in their own coun­try by for­eign immi­grants, rose more than once in revolt against the immi­gra­tion pol­i­cy of the British Government.

    As for Israeli rule since 1948, lit­tle needs to be said about the apartheid, bru­tal, dis­crim­i­na­to­ry and racist nature of the state – both against the Muslim/​Christian Arab pop­u­la­tions (in Israel and the Pales­tin­ian refugee camps) and against Jews them­selves of Ori­en­tal and African descent. A num­ber of doc­u­ments by Amnesty Inter­na­tion­al and Human Rights Watch re-affirm what the world has wit­nessed for 60 years of the bru­tal dis­re­gard of human life and bla­tant dis­crim­i­na­tion, result­ing in the con­sis­tent ten­sion for the region as a whole. There­fore, polit­i­cal­ly, Israel will nev­er pro­vide a basis for polit­i­cal sta­bil­i­ty in the region giv­en its innate racist phi­los­o­phy, Zion­ist polit­i­cal agen­da and sus­tained oppo­si­tion from a peo­ple that have been forcibly dis­placed and will con­tin­ue to work for the com­plete lib­er­a­tion of Pales­tine from Zion­ist and colo­nial control.

    In con­clu­sion, the legit­i­ma­cy of Israel is estab­lished upon deceit, dis­hon­esty and hypocrisy. It real­i­ty it has no legit­i­ma­cy and the eth­i­cal, his­tor­i­cal, reli­gious and polit­i­cal claims are false and twist­ed. The occu­pied peo­ple of Pales­tine have the legal right to oppose occu­pa­tion and strive for the com­plete lib­er­a­tion of Pales­tine. This is a right for the peo­ple of Pales­tine ; a right that exists for eth­i­cal, his­tor­i­cal, reli­gious and polit­i­cal rea­sons – unlike the false rea­sons that the pro­po­nents of Israel have claimed.

    Source : KCom Journal

  4. Jane B. Drake Avatar

    I believe in the Lord God of Abra­ham, as He is revealed by all the Prophets from Abra­ham through Muham­mad. There­fore, I also believe in the Mes­si­ah Jesus,” as Muham­mad iden­ti­fies him. And I believe in the promis­es God has pro­vid­ed for His images, includ­ing the promise con­veyed by Jesus, who told us that some­day, God’s images will do greater things” than he did when he lived on earth.

    My desire is to help us avoid the gross dark­ness” of a nuclear win­ter, as the Prophet Isa­iah pre­cise­ly described it. To avoid the dark­ness”, the Prophet Malachi said we must turn our hearts to each oth­er. Believ­ers can­not turn our hearts to oth­ers unless we learn about God and our Mes­si­ah from all the Prophets.

    Hav­ing lived 79 years, I’ve heard more than enough of the man­made hog­wash” that has been said — espe­cial­ly these days — that con­tra­dict or nul­li­fy God’s promis­es. For any­one to take it upon him­self to alter God’s promis­es appears to me to be the epit­o­me of igno­rance. I’ve writ­ten a book, and main­tain a web­site and a blog pre­sent­ing the com­bined teach­ings of all the Prophets. And I read­i­ly dis­cuss sub­jects with any­one who will do so civil­ly. But I am not inclined to dis­cuss the last com­ment, sug­gest­ing that I lis­ten to peo­ple who have no respect for the Sacred Teach­ings of the Prophets, as they have been pre­served and passed down to us. They are our ONLY source of knowl­edge about God. Every­thing else is pure imag­i­na­tion by humans who know not what they do.”

  5. Al-Qur'an Wa Sunnah Avatar
    Al-Qur'an Wa Sunnah

    As sala­mu’a­lykum every­one. Hel­lo Jane Drake, it is inter­est­ing to see how you remain dis­mis­sive of oth­er peo­ple’s views and obsti­nate in your own. It is appalling that your response did not touch on the heart of AR’s com­ments. You sim­ply remain igno­rant and respond emo­tion­al­ly. His­to­ry and evi­dence is need­ed, where are your proofs to your claims and asser­tions ? The verse you per­sist to dis­play as jus­ti­fi­ca­tion resem­bles the vers­es ter­ror­ists use. They take them out of con­text and use it to fur­ther their agen­da. You keep say­ing that Mus­lims are try­ing to make oth­er scrip­tures obso­lete and jus­ti­fy their right to the land, and then go on to say that Jews have the right to the land because thi­er book says so. What makes you any dif­fer­ent ? I won­der if you even read these scrip­tures, did you read the sto­ry when Moses and his peo­ple escaped the Pharoah and Moses asked his peo­ple to return to phillis­tine and they refused. If you stud­ied his­to­ry, you would know that Jews were kicked out of the promised land” many times. So when does this prophe­cy apply ? You must have found all this insignif­i­cant. All Israel is com­mit­ting is legal­ized” ter­ror­ism all to ful­fill under­ly­ing polit­i­cal motives. Why, if God want­ed these peo­ple to return to their land, did they have to kill mil­lions of peo­ple, com­mit hun­dreds of mas­sacres, Jenin being one I’m sure you remem­ber, but Mus­lim blood does not mat­ter to you as long as you get your land. I don’t think they were Mus­lims intent on erad­i­cat­ing Israel, they were just civil­ians inno­cent­ly going about their busi­ness in a ter­ri­to­ry that Israel felt they need­ed to cap­i­tal­ize on. All your talk about not know­ing if scrip­tures have been cor­rupt­ed is fool­ish, you sim­ply are deny­ing some­thing you know if real­ized by major­i­ty could jea­pordize your mis­sion. Instead of repeat­ing your­self again and again try to read what oth­ers write and answer appro­pri­ate­ly. I advise you to vis­it these web­sites read the arti­cles, ana­lyze them, and make an edu­cat­ed judg­ment. Read a lit­tle before you com­mence to write your next response.
    http://​harun​yahya​.com/​p​a​l​e​s​t​i​n​e​11​.​php
    http://​www​.bis​mikaal​lahu​ma​.org/​a​r​c​h​i​v​e​s​/​2005​/​o​n​-​t​h​e​-​i​n​t​e​g​r​i​t​y​-​o​f​-​t​h​e​-​b​i​b​le/
    http://​www​.bis​mikaal​lahu​ma​.org/​a​r​c​h​i​v​e​s​/​2005​/​t​h​e​y​-​s​a​y​-​y​o​u​r​-​b​i​b​l​e​-​h​a​s​-​n​o​t​-​b​e​e​n​-​c​o​r​r​u​p​t​e​d​-​r​e​a​l​ly/
    http://​www​.bis​mikaal​lahu​ma​.org/​a​r​c​h​i​v​e​s​/​2005​/​t​h​e​-​d​e​v​e​l​o​p​m​e​n​t​-​o​f​-​t​h​e​-​c​o​n​c​e​p​t​-​o​f​-​s​c​r​i​p​t​u​r​e​-​i​n​-​t​h​e​-​e​a​r​l​y​-​c​h​r​i​s​t​i​a​n​-​c​h​u​r​ch/
    http://​www​.bis​mikaal​lahu​ma​.org/​a​r​c​h​i​v​e​s​/​2005​/​p​a​u​l​s​-​d​e​p​e​n​d​e​n​c​y​-​o​n​-​t​a​l​m​u​d​i​c​-​w​r​i​t​i​n​g​s​-​e​v​i​d​e​n​c​e​-​o​f​-​n​e​w​-​t​e​s​t​a​m​e​n​t​-​b​o​r​r​o​w​i​ng/

    I ask the bis­mi­ka allahu­ma team to kind­ly respond to Jane B. Drake. We need to edu­cate peo­ple like her about the issue of the real­i­ty of cor­rup­tion of pre­vi­ous scrip­tures, and the real­i­ty of the Pales­tine and Israel con­flict. Once again I request some­one more edu­cat­ed than I to repu­di­ate her sil­ly state­ments. You’re not fool­ing any­one, you don’t want peace and rec­on­cil­i­a­tion betwen the war­ring peo­ple. You want accep­tance of a racist/​ter­ror­ist state and have Mus­lims to leave their home­land. May Allah reward the bis​mikaal​lahu​ma​.org team for their great efforts.

  6. Jane B. Drake Avatar

    All we can know about the teach­ings deliv­ered by the Prophets has been record­ed in the Scrip­tures of each reli­gion. There­fore, it is very easy for peo­ple to dis­pute some of those teach­ings ! They only need to quote the schol­ars” who sus­pect” the Scrip­tures were tam­pered with.” In truth, no one has any proof what­so­ev­er that tam­per­ing occurred, since no one can pro­duce the so-called orig­i­nal text” to com­pare with the so-called altered text.” So, every­one who reads any of the ancient Scrip­tures has a choice. He can either believe what is writ­ten, or dis­cred­it what he doesn’t like. But I try to avoid dis­cus­sions with peo­ple who dis­card” por­tions of any Scrip­tures. I dis­cuss what is writ­ten and I accept the Prophets’ record­ed words as God-giv­en teach­ings.” Con­se­quent­ly, I will repeat what I first post­ed here, which no one has answered,” except to infer that the words I quote are the prod­ucts of tam­per­ing.”

    (Begin quote): About 3,400 years ago, before the Hebrews had even entered the Promised Land,” Moses warned his peo­ple of a future day, when they would be “…dri­ven out [of the Land] to the far­thest parts under heav­en…” (Deut. 30:4). But Moses also assured the Israelites that God “…will have com­pas­sion on you and gath­er you again from all the nations where the Lord your God has scat­tered you” (Deut. 30:3).

    If, today, Mus­lims tru­ly believed Muham­mad, they would believe what was giv­en to Moses.” And they would rejoice in the res­ur­rec­tion of Israel as Moses fore­told. Instead, count­less Mus­lims, believe in some [prophets] but deny oth­ers,” while they pre­pare to wipe Israel off the map.” (End quote)

    As I see it, Moses’ prophe­cy, along with oth­ers that elab­o­rate on it, tell us what is hap­pen­ing today. Grant­ed, some ortho­dox Jews believe that Israel can­not be res­ur­rect­ed” until the Mes­si­ah comes, but, again, that is their clergy’s inter­pre­ta­tion, which they’ve embraced. It is not the com­mon­ly held belief among Jews, who sim­ply believe the Prophets fore­told the res­ur­rec­tion of Israel, as it is writ­ten in the Hebrew Scriptures.

    To dis­miss those prophe­cies as false” is, in essence, to dis­miss the Hebrew Scrip­tures. I absolute­ly do not believe that all Mus­lims want to do that, espe­cial­ly in light of Muhammad’s teach­ings against believ­ing some Prophets and deny­ing oth­ers ! Yet, unfor­tu­nate­ly, the Mus­lims with the strongest pub­lic voice these days fol­low the same path Chris­tians trav­eled before them : they dis­miss the Hebrews Scrip­tures as obso­lete” and pro­ceed to estab­lish them­selves as the heirs of the Holy Land.” And that is what I blame on” the cler­gies of Chris­tian­i­ty and Islam.

  7. Al-Qur'aan wa Sunnah Avatar
    Al-Qur'aan wa Sunnah

    Assala­mu alaikum every­one. I real­ly enjoyed this debate, it was very cap­ti­vat­ing. I real­ly appre­ci­at­ed Jane and Abdur Rah­man’s opinons. How­ev­er, in all hon­esty, I too did not know where Jane was going with their com­ments. What was she try­ing to prove or present. Abdur Rah­man had a much bet­ter method of pre­sent­ing his ideas, because he pro­vid­ed exam­ples, evi­dence, and so on. I have read most of the things that AR allud­ed to and they are accu­rate and authen­tic. Con­trary to Janes claim that his response was hack­neyed, his response high­light­ed things that the major­i­ty of peo­ple do not know or real­ize. The truth is Janes com­ment is more com­mon and wide­spread than AR’s. AR tried to effec­tive­ly dis­sem­i­nate the truth and for that Jane asso­ciates him with mil­lions of mus­lims who want to plunge the world with dark­ness. Com­ments like those should not be allowed, they are not con­ducive to under­stand­ing and tol­er­ance rather they induce racism and hatred. Jane your com­ments are all the­o­ret­i­cal and biased and why did you dis­miss such prac­ti­cal, impar­tial and objec­tive crit­i­cism by AR ? I await a response by AR on your lat­est comment.

  8. Abdur Rahman Avatar
    Abdur Rahman

    I am sor­ry Jane I can­not agree with you at all on this post. My post did not encour­age nuclear war as a means of end­ing this atro­cious peri­od in human his­to­ry, in fact I stat­ed that an intel­lec­tu­al bat­tle is nec­es­sary. Debates and dia­logue are the meth­ods that will facil­i­tate under­stand­ing and hope­ful­ly expe­di­ate the peace process. My post sim­ply stat­ed that we can­not accept or tol­er­ate a crim­i­nals offense under the premise that if we are against it then more vio­lence will ensue. We can­not accept trans­gres­sions or else the oppres­sor will recieve it as an open door to com­mit more heinous acts. Jus­tice is what needs to pre­vail, when I gave the exam­ple of you invad­ing my house and me retal­i­at­ing to defend my peo­ple, I was not legi­t­a­miz­ing vio­lence rather I was explain­ing that it is the nat­ur­al instinct that one is dis­posed to. You can­not vil­li­fy mere­ly one side as the media does in terms of Pales­tini­ans. How come not once did you state that Israel must stop its oppres­sive and bru­tal purges upon civil­ians ? There has to be a non-par­ti­san approach, we have to jux­ta­pose the two per­spec­tives in order to find a solution.

    Do not be so inju­di­cious, a Mus­lim can­not dis­miss all the prophets ways except cler­gy” inter­pre­ta­tions of Prophet Muham­mad’s ways. Prophet Muham­mad’s way is com­prised of all the prophets tra­di­tions with some improve­ments and new prac­tices. The Qur’an teach­es mankind lessons by using exam­ples of the lives of 25 of the great­est Prophets inspired by Allah. By dis­miss­ing any of them, we would be com­mit­ting kufr, dis­be­lief. Chris­tians and Jews are held in such high esteem in the Qur’an that we call them the peo­ple of the book. We can eat from their food, mar­ry from their peo­ple, and coex­ist with them peace­ful­ly. This is what Prophet Muhammad(saas) and his com­pan­ions did in the past. Prophet declared that jews and chris­tians liv­ing under an Islam­ic state should be pro­tect­ed under law, their church­es and syn­a­gogues are to be guard­ed from any destruc­tion, exempt from mil­i­tary duty, and they have the right to pro­fess their reli­gion. This is the para­mount rea­son why non-mus­lims lived in har­mo­ny with mus­lims for so long. Jews even advanced along­side the Mus­lims in spain. This is the Qur’an­ic injunc­tion of how to live with non-mus­lims. When we are to debate with them, we are are involved in a dis­course with them we are to speak from the best words in a gen­tle man­ner and not treat them harsh­ly. We are fol­low­ing the Sun­nah, tra­di­tion, of all the Prophets, how­ev­er, this was not the pri­ma­ry focus of my post. Unfor­tu­nate­ly once again your post does not have a log­i­cal flow, here you are say­ing that Mus­lims should be fol­low­ing the tra­di­tion of the past prophet’s and then you go on to speak about accep­tance of Israel and then back to embrac­ing ideas from all dif­fer­ent faiths. First of all my post and Mus­lims in gen­er­al are not opposed to the Sun­nah of oth­er prophets and rec­on­cil­i­a­tion between faiths, after all that was what the Prophet Muhammad(saas) did., this is an oblig­a­tion for us. Fol­low­ing the prophets has noth­ing to do with accept­ing Israel in fact it runs con­trary to the mes­sage of the Prophets. The con­cept of Mus­lims teach­ing that the pre­vi­ous scrip­tures have been cor­rupt­ed is cor­rect and it is based on evi­dence. This is not a ques­tion of his­tor­i­cal obscu­ri­ty, his­to­ry proves that this is true. Chris­t­ian and Jew­ish schol­ars them­selves agree and have writ­ten many books per­tain­ing to the cor­rup­tion of their holy books. There is no doubt that there is beau­ti­ful ideals that remain in those scrip­tures but it is taint­ed with man-made con­cepts and per­cep­tions. We as Mus­lims are sim­ply fol­low­ing the true mes­sage of what all the Prophets brought down to this earth.

    It is beau­ti­ful that you try to embrace all the teach­ing of the Prophets but you con­tra­dict your­self when you speak of mil­lions of Mus­lims who seek nuclear solu­tions to con­flicts. You con­tra­dict your­self when you speak of a legi­t­a­mate state of Israel. Nowhere in these reli­gious scrip­tures is there a com­mand to exe­cute reli­gious dis­crim­i­na­tion, racism, and mass mur­ders all to estab­lish pure” blood of a cho­sen” peo­ple on a promised” land as the zion­ists pro­claim, keep in mind I do not use jews” because all this goes against the Torah. Have you not heard the voic­es of ortho­dox jews who join hands with Mus­lims against the occu­pa­tion of Pales­tine by Israel. O, you must have dis­missed those voic­es as obso­lete.” My friend the truth will pre­vail, and there will come a time when Mus­lims, Chris­tians, and Jews unite against Israel. His­to­ry is our biggest weapon against the zion­ists, his­to­ry explains it all. So, advo­cates of Israel can hide behind this false reli­gious claim, but truth will inevitably come and tri­umph over false­hood. No one is against a state for the jews, even though ortho­dox jews believe it is dis­cor­dant to jew­ish teach­ings, they are against Israel in Pales­tin­ian lands. Why don’t we go ask Ger­many to set aside a place for the cho­sen” peo­ple, ” hey uh yea we’re like uh cho­sen by God, so u wan­na like give us a whole chunk of land, o hey I almost for­got were you not the peo­ple that killed mil­lions of my peo­ple. O wow, sil­ly me, and all this time I was bash­ing Mus­lims for their rejec­tion of Israel in Pales­tine. You guys are sup­posed to be giv­ing us repa­ra­tions. Plus most of our pop­u­la­tion is descen­dants of Russ­ian tribes, lets go estab­lish a state there, I’m sure Rus­sia will wel­come us with open hands.” Chris­tians and Jew know best that Israel is in the wrong, so I advise you to stop vil­li­fy­ing mil­lions of Mus­lims and ven­er­at­ing Zion­ists. There are wrong doers in every faith, and they do not rep­re­sent their reli­gion in its true state, just as Al-qae­da does not and Zion­ist Israelis do not. to end, I have to say that your last com­ments take away from your all-embrac­ing” approach when you say that I am with mil­lions of mus­lims who wish to plunge the earth with dark­ness all to prove my point, prob­a­bly one of the most igno­rant and racist com­ments you have writ­ten yet.

    I was using his­to­ry, evi­dence, a prag­mat­ic approach to this tur­bu­lent issue. We have to be hon­est, open mind­ed, and prac­ti­cal if we wish to solve any­thing, we can­not sim­ply resort to impas­sioned, bias, and erro­neous accu­sa­tions as you have. Vil­li­fy­ing your oppo­nent is some­thing you obvi­ous­ly like to do, but I will not be tempt­ed to do the same. Just as my first post, all I ask is that we get to the points and show both sides of this issue. Assala­mu’a­lykum wa rah­mat­ul­lah wa barakatuhu to all my broth­ers and sis­ters and May Allah guide all the truth seek­ers to the Islam, the reli­gion of truth. Alham­dulil­lahir rab­bil alameen was salaatu was salaa­mu ala Rasu­l­ul­lah. Allah give us strength and knowl­edge to become vic­to­ri­ous over the wrong­do­ers, and Ya Allah end this blood­shed and estab­lish peace in the Mid­dle East, restore it to its pres­tine posi­tion where it had been when Caliph Umar ruled and Salahudeen Ayyu­bi. Dear friend, Jane, we are not ene­mies, I will not treat you as one do not treat me as one. We are seek­ers of peace, we will inshaAl­lah work togeth­er to attain this peace and under­stand­ing that this world is dire need of.

  9. dav Avatar
    dav

    Which fam­i­ly linage did Quran say prophets of God comes from ?

  10. Jane B. Drake Avatar

    Mr. Rah­man, You are doing exact­ly what num­ber­less Jews and Chris­tians do : You briefly men­tion teach­ings from your Holy Book and then pro­ceed to dis­cuss at length the teach­ings of your cler­gy. The cler­gies of all three reli­gions have inter­pret­ed their own Scrip­tures in ways that exalt their own reli­gion while declar­ing the oth­ers false or obso­lete. And those inter­pre­ta­tions have brought us to the brink of the nuclear war and win­ter pre­cise­ly described by the Prophet Isa­iah, who told us “…dark­ness shall cov­er the earth and gross dark­ness the peoples…”(Isa. 60:2). But the Hebrew Prophet Malachi said we could avoid that dark­ness” if we will LEARN TO TURN OUR HEARTS TO EACH OTHER (Malachi 3:24/4:6). Although you dis­miss those Prophets as obso­lete,” if you sur­vive the nuclear war, you’ll remem­ber them when you are sit­ting in the proph­e­sied dark­ness that you did noth­ing to pre­vent, and, in fact, helped to cre­ate — by dis­miss­ing all the Prophets’ teach­ings except your CLERGY’S inter­pre­ta­tions of your own.

    Unless we embrace the teach­ings about our Lord God and the Mes­si­ah He promised to send us – teach­ings deliv­ered by the Prophets of Judaism, Chris­tian­i­ty and Islam – we will not be able to turn our hearts to each oth­er. Those teach­ings NEVER con­tra­dict each oth­er. It’s the cler­gies who inter­pret them who have cre­at­ed the con­tra­dic­tions. It is very sad that you are the only Mus­lim who chose to answer my post – and very sad that you chose to answer with the hack­neyed argu­ments I hear every­where. I am sim­ply one voice embrac­ing the teach­ings of all the Prophets (through a book, a web­site and a blog). While you speak for mil­lions of peo­ple who are will­ing to plunge the earth into dark­ness in your effort to prove” you are right. By sheer num­ber, I expect your side” will win – if you con­sid­er a nuclear war win­ning” the argument !

  11. Abdur Rahman Avatar
    Abdur Rahman

    First of all just to pro­vide the verse men­tioned by Jane and the two oth­er vers­es that fol­low after -
    4:150 VERILY, those who deny God and His apos­tles by endeav­our­ing to make a dis­tinc­tion between [belief in] God and [belief in] His apos­tles, and who say, We believe in the one but we deny the oth­er,” and want to pur­sue a path in-between -
    4:151 it is they, they who are tru­ly deny­ing the truth : and for those who deny the truth We have read­ied shame­ful suffering.
    4:152 But as for those who believe in God and His apos­tles and make no dis­tinc­tion between any of them- unto them, in time, will He grant their re­wards [in full]. And God is indeed much-for­giv­ing, a dis­penser of grace.

    You are cor­rect in the idea that Mus­lims make no dis­tinc­tion between any of the Prophets of God, how­ev­er your argu­ment falls apart when you say Mus­lims are then required to believe in the words of God” brought to Jesus and Moses. First of all, it is evi­dent that their mes­sages were cor­rupt­ed and dis­tort­ed by man. Hence, Allah revealed His last and com­plete mes­sage to mankind in the Qur’an. Also your per­cep­tion of Isre­al may be influ­enced by zion­ist rhetoric. The Pales­tin­ian and Israeli con­flict has been preva­lent for quite some time. It has caused count­less deaths and has been the source of great tur­moil for gen­er­a­tions. As a young child all I knew about the con­flict was see­ing a map ( pre-1940) that had the coun­try of Pales­tine, then lat­er (post-1940) that had Israel in its place. That had sparked some curios­i­ty and resent­ment in me. As a Mus­lim, my fel­low peo­ples land was stolen and their coun­try was min­i­mized to the point of few dots on the map. Lat­er in my life I have come to know more about the sit­u­a­tion, both reli­gious­ly, polit­i­cal­ly and his­tor­i­cal­ly. Zion­ists (not fol­low­ing the torah) stat­ed they had a his­tor­i­cal claim as well as a reli­gious claim to the land of Pales­tine. How­ev­er, his­tor­i­cal­ly, the chil­dren of Israel were not the first occu­piers of the land just one among the many and they nev­er had rule of all of Pales­tine. Canaan­ites and Philis­teens ruled the land of Pales­tine and mod­ern day Pales­tini­ans are descen­dants of them who ruled for about 5000 years. Zion­ists often invoke the Book of Gen­e­sis (15:16) which states : In the same day the LORD made a covenant with Abram, say­ing, Unto thy seed have I giv­en this land, from the riv­er of Egypt unto the great riv­er, the riv­er Euphrates.” The seed” or son meant here is Ish­mael – the first born. What we know from his­to­ry is that this promise” was only ful­filled through the Arab descen­dants of Ish­mael, the fore­fa­ther of Muham­mad (P), and not ever by any descen­dant of Isaac. Today more than 80% of Jews in Pales­tine have no his­tor­i­cal rela­tion­ship to it and they belong to tribes from south­ern Russia(Habib Sid­diqui). Dur­ing Mus­lim rule/​ottoman empire and oth­ers before, Pales­tine was a land of peace where peo­ple of all 3 reli­gions lived togeth­er in har­mo­ny. Now it is filled with death and dis­sent. I agree with most mid­dle east experts who say that if there is to be peace in Pales­tine, it has to be ruled like the ottoman empire and Caliph Umar ruled before.

    Please do not repeat old views that hold no weight. Where were you going with this com­ment of yours ? First of all you must think objec­tive­ly, are you blind, dumb, and or deaf ? Is it Isre­al who is the vic­tim ? Do not decieve your­self, your con­science will defi­nate­ly tell you that Isre­al is car­ry­ing out one of the great­est geno­cides in the his­to­ry of mankind. How can such thought­ful peo­ple let a pop­u­la­tion of vio­lent, bar­bar­ic crim­i­nals per­pet­u­ate their bla­tant mas­sacres of an inno­cent peo­ple. Have you read about the apartheid wall, have you read about the drain­ing of nat­ur­al resources, have you read about the house demo­li­tions ? Please we need peo­ple to think clear­ly and look for a appropi­ate solu­tion not some naïve request to stop Islam­ic mil­i­tants. If you came to my house, killed my moth­er and father, and raped my sis­ter, would you expect me to step away and kiss your hand. No, I would fight you and defend my peo­ple. Do not be so incon­sid­er­ate of the pales­tin­ian peo­ples right to live. The vio­lence in the mid­dle east will only end when Israel leaves occu­pied lands. For­give me if I came out a bit harsh, who­ev­er you may be I ask Allah to guide you to the truth. Hon­est­ly I could not under­stand your stance on the issue you were writ­ing about. Basi­cal­ly, if Mus­lims will unite togeth­er to fight intel­lec­tu­al­ly against the mighty oppres­sive giant, Israel, we can eas­il­ly sub­due it and restore peace. Indeed there is the key to peace and har­mo­ny among faiths in the mes­sage of Muhammad(saas), Mus­lims should do their out­most to revive his blessed teach­ings. What­ev­er mis­takes I have made, May Allah for­give me, and what­ev­er is good and right is from Allah, all praise is due to him. Once again my friend, clear your heart, I believe you have the right inten­tions, but like all of us who suf­fer from igno­rance, you must study these issues in depth and By Allah you will uncov­er the real truth. Take care and May Allah guide your steps in all your affairs.

  12. Jane B. Drake Avatar

    While I find your expla­na­tion of Mus­lim cus­toms well pre­sent­ed and very inter­est­ing, I won­der how you will react to my com­ments on a course of action that is of far more impor­tance, which Mus­lims could pur­sue in these dan­ger­ous days. I title my sug­ges­tions : If Mus­lims Believed Muhammad,
    They Could Trans­form the World

    Through the Koran, Muham­mad tells Mus­lims to Say : We believe in God and what was revealed to Abra­ham and Ish­mael, to Isaac and Jacob and the tribes, and what was giv­en to Moses and Jesus and the prophets. We dis­crim­i­nate against none of them” (The Fam­i­ly of Imran 3:84).

    Anoth­er time, Muham­mad warns Mus­lims against draw­ing “…a line between God and His apos­tles, say­ing : We believe in some but deny oth­ers.…’” (Women 4:150).

    About 3,400 years ago, before the Hebrews had even entered the Promised Land,” Moses warned his peo­ple of a future day, when they would be “…dri­ven out [of the Land] to the far­thest parts under heav­en…” (Deut. 30:4). But Moses also assured the Israelites that God “…will have com­pas­sion on you and gath­er you again from all the nations where the Lord your God has scat­tered you” (Deut. 30:3).

    If, today, Mus­lims tru­ly believed Muham­mad, they would believe what was giv­en to Moses.” And they would rejoice in the res­ur­rec­tion of Israel as Moses fore­told. Instead, count­less Mus­lims, believe in some [prophets] but deny oth­ers,” while they pre­pare to wipe Israel off the map.”

    In oth­er words, if Mus­lims believed the Prophets who pre­ced­ed Muham­mad and drew no line” between them, they would humbly admit to God and the world, We have been wrong to fight against Israel.” And an aston­ished world would behold Israel’s dead­ly ene­mies evi­denc­ing incred­i­ble faith, unmatched by Jews and Chris­tians through­out their bloody history !

    If mil­i­tant Mus­lims and their sup­port­ers renounced their igno­rant rejec­tion of Israel and trans­formed them­selves into peace­ful believ­ers in Abraham’s God, astound­ed Jews and Chris­tians would be hard-pressed to renounce their own igno­rant dis­missal of Muham­mad as a false prophet” and Islam as a false religion.”

    Then, Jews and Chris­tians, fol­low­ing the Mus­lims’ unique exam­ple, could final­ly aban­don their own erro­neous man­made teach­ings about the Mes­si­ah Jesus” (Women 4:171) and embrace Muhammad’s mes­sages about him, which Jews and Chris­tians have always scorned — the very mes­sages that could cre­ate peace among all believ­ers.”

    If Mus­lims believed Muhammad….

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *