Tag: Biblical criticism

  • Paul Says That Mark Is Futile: No Resurrection In Mark’s Gospel

    Paul Says That Mark Is Futile: No Resurrection In Mark’s Gospel

    But the first of the four gospels, i.e., the Gospel according to Mark, apparently did not receive Paul’s memo. And this is a very important point as we keep in mind that each of the gospels were initially divorced from each other and were written in different localities for different audiences.

  • The Usage and Significance of the New Testament Versions for Text Critical Purposes

    The Usage and Significance of the New Testament Versions for Text Critical Purposes

    “Versions” are simply the translations of the New Testament into other languages. The New Testament writers originally wrote their books and epistles in the Greek language whereas the versions are translations of their writings into other languages. Naturally, non-Greek speaking Christians wanted the text of the New Testament in their own local languages and so the New Testament began to be translated into other languages sometime in the mid to late second century. An important point to remember is that no matter how many thousands of translations exist, it remains that they are in a different language from the original language (Greek) of the New Testament, thus their use and value will be limited.

  • Geographical Errors Within The New Testament

    Geographical Errors Within The New Testament

    It is well known that the Gospel of Mark contains numerous geographical errors. This is summed up in Kummel’s classic, Introduction to the New Testament: [T]he considerations against this assumption [that John Mark, companion of Peter, wrote the gospel of Mark] carry weight. The author obviously has no personal knowledge of Palestinian geography, as the […]

error: Content is protected !!