Categories
Polemical Rebuttals

Does Islam Require Four Witnesses For Rape?

Does Islam really require four witness for rape victims? This is a common argument used by those who usually attempt to make a false analogy with adultery by inferring from the following Qur’anic injunction:

“And those who accuse chaste women [of adultery] and then do not produce four witnesses — lash them with eighty lashes and do not accept from them testimony ever after. And those are the defiantly disobedient. Except for those who repent thereafter and reform, for indeed Allaah is Forgiving and Merciful.”1

That this myth was repeated by none other than the former Malaysian Prime Minister Tun Dr. Mahathir at an UMNO General Assembly meeting had greatly contributed to the misconception that Islam requires four witnesses for rape:

    If four witnesses were to merely watch a woman being raped and not attempt to help her, would they not be regarded as having sinned (for allowing a woman to be raped) and are not be fit to be witnesses?” he said. Under Pas’ hudud also, rape victims would in turn become the accused in the event that she could not make the four witnesses available.

Unfortunately for such people, this fallacy of equivocation has no basis in Islamic jurisdictions and the punishment for rape (which is defined as forced sexual intercourse) is certainly not equivalent to the punishment of adultery.

Insha’allah, in what follows we aim to deal with this issue once and for all by breaking it down into several points so as to enable easy understanding.

The claim that rape victims require four witnesses to seek justice for their case is untrue and a false lie propagated by those who either do not have any knowledge in Islamic law or want to “prove” a so-called weakness in the hadd laws. Circumstantial evidence is sufficient and the judge can invoke his judgment based upon takzir (his own discretion).

If a person makes an allegation of adultery against another person (male or female), only then he or she must produce four witnesses to support such an allegation: “And those who accuse chaste women [of adultery] and then do not produce four witnesses….”2; otherwise, he or she is guilty of slandering, which is a grave offense in Islam.

To insist that the raped victim must provide witnesses is akin to inflicting further pain on her. If anyone refutes her claim of innocence, the onus is on him to provide evidence, and she may simply deny the claim by making a solemn oath, thus clearing herself in public.

This is based on what the Prophet Muhammad(P) had once said:

“The onus to provide evidence falls on the one who makes a claim, and the one who denies (the same) can absolve himself or herself by making a solemn oath to the contrary.”3

Further, the Prophet(P) was reported to have said that:

“Allah(T) has pardoned my people for the acts they do by mistake, due to forgetfulness and what they are coerced into doing.”4

An event concerning rape had in fact led towards the Prophet Muhammad(P) punishing a rapist without demanding or even hinting for four witnesses:

“Narrated Wa’il ibn Hujr: “When a woman went out in the time of the Prophet(P) for prayer, a man attacked her and overpowered [raped] her. She shouted and he went off, and when a man came by, she said: That [man] did such and such to me. And when a company of the Emigrants came by, she said: That man did such and such to me. They went and seized the man whom they thought had had intercourse with her and brought him to her.

She said: Yes, this is he. Then they brought him to the Apostle of Allah.

When he [the Prophet] was about to pass sentence, the man who [actually] had assaulted her stood up and said: Apostle of Allah, I am the man who did it to her.

He [the Prophet] said to her: Go away, for Allah has forgiven you. But he told the man some good words [Abu Dawud said: “meaning the man who was seized”], and of the man who had had intercourse with her, he said: “Stone him to death.5

It should also be noted that it was related by Ibn Abi Shaybah through Târiq b. Shahab that a woman accused with adultery was taken to Caliph `Umar. The woman pleaded that she was asleep and woke up to find the man over her. `Umar released the woman.6

Based on the above sayings of the Prophet(P) and the events associated with it, the jurist Ibn Qudamah had stated as follows in his book al-Mughnî:

“If a woman becomes pregnant without having a husband or a master, she may not be punished and, in stead, she should be asked about it, if she claimed that she was coerced into it or that she committed adultery under dubious circumstances, or if she simply does not confess adultery then she will not be punished. This is the saying of Abu Hanîfah and al-Shâfi`î, because she may be pregnant as a result of a forceful intercourse or dubious circumstances. Punishment will be abandoned in case suspicion exists. It is well known that a woman could become pregnant without committing the real intercourse. The woman may become pregnant if sperm is manually inserted into her vagina. This would explain how a virgin becomes pregnant.”

We can now see that a testimony of the raped woman suffices in exonerating her from adultery and that Islam recognises the crime of rape and that a raped woman will not be punished for such a crime that was inflicted upon her.

So What Really Is The Punishment For Rape?

According to the majority opinion of Muslim scholars, rape is considered as hirabah (highway robbery or terrorism) and hence rapists are to be punished according to the hirabah laws, as highlighted in the Qur’an:

The punishments of those who wage war against Allah and His Prophet and strive to spread disorder in the land are to execute them in an exemplary way or to crucify them or to amputate their hands and feet from opposite sides or to banish them from the land. Such is their disgrace in this world, and in the Hereafter theirs will be an awful doom save those who repent before you overpower them; you should know that Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Ever Merciful. (Quran 5:33)

This punishment is justified as rape is considered to be “hirabah with the private parts” which is much worse than any other types of hirabah:

Al-Dasuqi, for example, a Maliki jurist, held that if a person forced a woman to have sex, his actions would be deemed committing hiraba. In addition, the Maliki judge Ibn ‘Arabi, relates a story in which a group was attacked and a woman in their party raped. Responding to the argument that the crime did not constitute hiraba because no money was taken and no weapons used, Ibn ‘Arabi replied indignantly that “hirabah with the private parts” is much worse than hiraba involving the taking of money, and that anyone would rather be subjected to the latter than the former.7

This of course is as opposed to what the Bible teaches about the punishment for rape. For example, we read that:

“If a man is caught in the act of raping a young woman who is not engaged, he must pay fifty pieces of silver to her father. Then he must marry the young woman because he violated her, and he will never be allowed to divorce her.”8

What kind of lunatic would make a rape victim marry her attacker? Is there any justice in forcing the raped woman to marry her rapist and bound her to him for the rest of his life? Further we also read another example that the Bible teaches that the rape victim should be punished with death:

“If within the city a man comes upon a maiden who is betrothed, and has relations with her, you shall bring them both out of the gate of the city and there stone them to death: the girl because she did not cry out for help though she was in the city, and the man because he violated his neighbor’s wife.”9

This injunction of course leaves little to the imagination. We will leave the reader to form their own conclusions. We hope that the above explanation that was given had made it clear that in Islam, rape victims are not required to “bring four witnesses” as alleged and that Judeo-Christianity has a much harsher law for rape when compared to Islam. Further reading on the issue can be found in the article, Are Raped Women Asked to Bring Four Witnesses?

And only God knows best!

  1. Quran 24: 2-5 []
  2. ibid. []
  3. Recorded in al-Baihaqi no 20990, Parts of it is in al-Bukhari no. 4552 and Muslim no. 1711 []
  4. Related by Ibn Mâjah, approved by al-Nawawî, Ibn Hajr and al-Albânî. []
  5. Sunan Abu Dawud, Book 38, #4366 []
  6. The narration was approved by al-Albâni. []
  7. Gisella Webb, Windows of Faith: Muslim Women’s Scholarship Activism in the United States, p. 130 []
  8. Deuteronomy 22:28-29 []
  9. Deuteronomy 22:23-24 []
Categories
Polemical Rebuttals

The Consensus on Homosexuality and The Illiteracy of Christian Polemicists

Among the most laughable arguments of Christian missionaries and atheists is their argument to show that Islam does not prohibit homosexuality and that it is permissible in Islam. This is indeed an ideal example of how ignorance and incompetence can make a person become a joke before his opponents. In order to dispel the Islamic illiteracy of these types of people, we are providing an educational guide to those who ignore that homosexuality is utterly prohibited and given the capital punishment in Islam.

Before we bring our legal proof that homosexuality is prohibited and punishable in Islam, let us think logically: does not homosexuality fall under the category of adultery? Is it not correct to say that adultery — by definition — is the sexual intercourse between two unmarried persons, which thus implicitly includes homosexuality? Unless you provide evidence that Islam permits the marriage of two men, we can logically consider it a subcategory under adultery.

Homosexuality is described as lewdness in the Qur’an. Grand Imam al-Shanqiti explains:

The Almighty said, “Do ye commit lewdness such as no people in creation (ever) committed before you?” (al-A’raf: 80). Allah has explained that what is meant by lewdness is sodomy, for He said after that, “For ye practice your lusts on men in preference to women.” And He clarified that by saying, “Of all the creatures in the world, will ye approach males” and by saying “and practice wickedness (even) in your councils?”1

Ibn Kathir notes:

It is meant that homosexuality is the worst abomination. It was not known among the Arabs of the past, as their ignorance of it was mentioned by more than one of them. Therefore, al-Walid ibn Abd al-Malik said, “If Allah Almighty did not narrate to us the story of the people of Lut, I would have never thought that a man could be on top of another man.” And in the hadith reported by Ibn ‘Abbas, may Allah be pleased with them, the Prophet (saws) said, “If you find someone committing the act of the people of Lut, kill both participants.” This was narrated by the people of sunan, and was rated authentic by Ibn Habban and others. The Prophet (saws) cursed three times those who commit the act of the people of Lut, and he never cursed anyone for sin three times, except those who do this. He commanded the participants to be killed, for they are not worthy to live among the people because they are corrupt in their actions and sinful in their hearts. Whoever has this likeness, there is nothing within them that is beneficial for creation if they remain. So if Allah saves us from them, our faith and lives will be more righteous. But the curse is to be expelled and made distant. So whoever was expelled and made distant from Allah, His Messenger, His Book and His righteous servants, there is no good in him or in coming near to him. 2

Please ponder upon this insightful quotation of Ibn Kathir; for he does not just inform us about the ugliness of this form of lewdness and its penalty, he also provides the legal and rational explanation for its penalty and tells us why its participant should be exterminated.

Ibn Hazm clearly states:

The act of the people of Lut is from the grievous sins, the most forbidden depravities like eating pork, carrion, or blood, drinking, adultery, and the rest of these disobediences. Anyone who allows it or allows anything from what we have mentioned is a kafir. But the people disagreed regarding the penalty.3

And Sheikh al-Islam Ibn Taimiyyah says:

In regards to sodomy, some scholars say its penalty is like the penalty of adultery, and some say it’s not. The truth is what the companions have agreed upon, that both should be killed, whether they were married or not. Truly the scholars of hadith narrated on behalf of Ibn ‘Abbas, may Allah be pleased with them, that the Prophet (saws) said, “If you find someone committing the acts of the people of Lut, kill both participants.” And Abu Daoud narrated on behalf of Ibn ‘Abbas, may Allah be pleased with them, that if the unmarried is found to be a sodomite he is to be stoned. And ‘Ali ibn Abi Talib, may Allah be pleased with him, narrated something similar.

The Companions did not disagree on his killing, but they varied regarding the method. It is narrated on behalf of Abu Bakr, may Allah be pleased with him, that he ordered him to be burned. And the others said that he should be killed: Some said that a wall should be pulled down upon him until he died, and some said that he should be imprisoned in the foulest place until death. And some said that he should be taken to the highest building and thrown down, then stoned, as Allah had done to the people of Lut. This is what most of the Salaf said. They said, because Allah had stoned the people of Lut, and He similarly allowed the stoning of the adulterer, so sodomites, whether slaves or freemen, should both be killed. But if one is an adult and the other juvenile, the juvenile should be punished without killing, and only the adult should be stoned. 4

So we inform the illiterate enemies of Islam that homosexuality is not only prohibited in Islam but considered one of the most grievous sins as well. The Prophet(P) commanded with killing its participants and cursed them three times, and he never cursed anyone for sin three times, except those who do this. The Prophet’s companions have agreed on killing whosoever do it, whether married or not, free or slave.

Muslim scholars of all times agreed upon condemning sodomy, Ibn Qudama says:

The scholars agree to warn against sodomy. Allah has spoken against it in His Book and the Messenger of Allah spoke against it. Allah Almighty says, “We also (sent) Lut: He said to his people: “Do ye commit lewdness such as no people in creation (ever) committed before you?” (A’raf:80). And the Prophet said, “Allah has cursed those who commit the act of the people of Lut, Allah has cursed those who commit the act of the people of Lut, Allah has cursed those who commit the act of the people of Lut.”5

Abu al-Layth al-Samaqandi says:

Sodomy is forbidden because the Almighty said: “We also (sent) Lut: He said to his people, “Do ye commit lewdness such as no people in creation (ever) committed before you?” (al-A’raf: 80). So He called it lewdness, and Allah Almighty has said: “Come not nigh to acts of lewdness, whether open or secret.” (al-Ana’am: 151)6

Imam al-Nawawi says:

Sodomy is when a man has intercourse with another man. It is forbidden, and it is the worst of sins, for the Almighty said, “Do ye commit lewdness such as no people in creation (ever) committed before you? For ye practice your lusts on men in preference to women: ye are indeed a people transgressing beyond bounds.” (al-A’raf: 80-81)

Here Allah mentions sodomy as sin to show that it’s adultery, because Allah said, “Nor come nigh to adultery, for it is a shameful (deed) and an evil, opening the road (to other evils).” (al-Isra: 32) 7

Abu Ya’la al-Farra’ brings a very valuable note:

Sodomy is worse than adultery; for indeed [a] female private can be lawful under marriage contract. 8

But certainly, a male private can never be lawful under any condition whatsoever!

Due to the agreed-upon consensus of Muslim scholars based upon the Qur’an, the Sunnah and agreement of the Prophet’s Companions and all subsequent generations, prohibition of homosexuality is regarded one of the necessarily known facts of Islam and whosoever denies this prohibition is considered a kafir. Little else can be said for the illiteracy of the worshippers of a half-naked, Roman criminal swinging from a cross, whose ignorance in such an intricate Islamic matter is as blinding as the sun.

May Allah bless all those who follow His Path and guide those who do not.

  1. al-Shanqiti, Adwa’ al-Bayan, 2/232) []
  2. Ibn Kathir, al-Bidayah wa al-Nihayah, 9/46 []
  3. Ibn Hazm, al-Muhalla, 13/388 []
  4. Ibn Taimiyyah, al-Fatawa al-Kubra, 28/317 []
  5. Ibn Qudama al-Maqdisi, al-Mughni, 8/116 []
  6. al-Samarqandi, al-Muhathab, 2/347 []
  7. al-Nawawi, al-Mujmou’, 21/237 []
  8. al-Farra’, al-Masa’il al-Fiqhiyyah, 2/320 []