Tex­tu­al Integrity

Sura’ al-Fati­hah and the Mis­sion­ary’s​“Straight Path”

Mohd Elfie Nieshaem Juferi -
Some Chris­t­ian mis­sion­ar­ies have the inher­ent fan­ta­sy that Sura’ al-Fati­hah (the first Sura’ of the Qur’an) some­how sup­ports their false pagan doc­trine of the Trin­i­ty. They will first cite the whole ayaat and then twist this inter­pre­ta­tion to suit their false doc­trine. Let us now deal with this lat­est polemic in the fol­low­ing paragraphs.
Read more

In This Category

The­mat­ic Struc­ture of Sura 2

A list of the the­mat­ic struc­ture of the Qur’an, arranged accord­ing to the main themes con­tained with­in Sura al-Baqarah.

The Mir­a­cle of Isra’ and Mi’raj

The verse of Isra’ in the Qur’an is clear not liable to hes­i­ta­tion or reluc­tance in say­ing that Allah had caused His ser­vant to trav­el by night from Al-Masjid Al-Haram to Al-Masjid Al-Aqsa like you say ; I trav­eled by night from such and such place to such and such place. So, there is no room for hes­i­ta­tion and ask­ing whether this was with body or spir­it, or awake or dur­ing sleep. Also, it is inap­pro­pri­ate to dis­agree regard­ing the mean­ing of this night jour­ney or regard­ing the word ​‘Abd, i.e., ser­vant, and whether it refers to the spir­it, to the body or to both, as it has hap­pened between those claim­ing bod­i­ly Isra and oth­ers claim­ing spir­i­tu­al Isra.

Furqaan : Com­men­tary on the Zaman-Heger Debate

Mohd Elfie Nieshaem Juferi When Dr. Christoph Heger, an Ori­en­tal­ist schol­ar with unknown qual­i­fi­ca­tions and dis­put­ed cre­den­tials, wrote his com­men­tary on the open­ing verse of…

P. Michaelides no 32

The fol­lowingAdolf Grohmann, The Prob­lem of Dat­ing Ear­ly Qur’an, in Der Islam 33 (1958), heft 3, pp. 222 – 226. is a detailed exam­i­na­tion of a…

Ear­ly Preser­va­tion & Trans­mis­sion Of The Qur’an

The fol­low­ing shows the text of the first Sura’ of the Qur’an inscribed on the shoul­der blade of a camel, pre­served in the Princeton…

Qur’an­ic Com­men­tary on Sura’ Al-Ikhlas (112)

The secret about Sura’ Al-Ikhlas is more than can meet the shal­low thoughts of athe­ists and crit­ics of Islam. This very short chap­ter con­tains in it the sum­ma­ry of many con­cepts that are to lead peo­ple to The One True God and to refute the mis­guid­ed notions about God. Although the Sura’ is very short, yet it re-stat­ed the Orig­i­nal True Mes­sage of God that was sent to all His prophets from the begin­ning of cre­ation and to cor­rect the mis­guid­ance that built-up with time.

Qur’an­ic Com­men­tary on Sura’ Az-Zukhruf (43): 63 – 64

The fol­low­ing is the repro­duc­tion of the trans­la­tion of Qur’an 43:63 – 64 with the accom­pa­ny­ing foot­notes to the amaz­ing con­sis­ten­cy and par­al­lelism with the Mes­sage which Jesus (P) had con­sis­tent­ly preached as found in the cur­rent gospels. It is often the com­mon mis­sion­ary argu­ment is that since the Qur’an is often found to ​“con­tra­dict” the Bible, it there­fore fol­lows that the Qur’an is wrong.

Sabaan Mina Al-Math­­ani : The Sev­en Which Are Often Repeated

In an arti­cle marked by a char­ac­ter­is­ti­cal­ly polem­i­cal style which is the hall­mark of almost any writ­ing to be found on Answer­ing Islam, the author has exert­ed his utmost effort to prove that the ref­er­ence in the Qur’an (15:87) to the ​“sev­en oft-repeat­ed” is ​“an exam­ple of the Qur’an’s incom­plete­ness and inco­her­ence.” Addi­tion­al­ly, the author impos­es a restric­tion on his ​“Mus­lim read­ers” to prove, ​“by con­sult­ing the Qur’an alone”, what is meant by these sev­en oft-repeat­ed. The author claims the appro­pri­ate­ness of this restric­tion by appeal­ing to the Qur’an­ic vers­es 6:38 and 10:37, and their online com­men­tary by ​“Pooya/M.A. Ali”.

The Furqan &​“The Warn­er”: Cor­rect­ing Christoph Heger’s Mis­in­ter­pre­ta­tion of Qur’an 25:1

The first key term requir­ing our con­cen­tra­tion is al-furq ? which occurs sev­en times in the Qur’an (i.e., 2:53, 185 ; 3:4 ; 8:29, 41 ; 21:48 ; 25:1) and is also one of the names giv­en to the sura 25. There seem to be three basic ele­ments influ­enc­ing the Qur’an­ic usage of this term : (i) a Salvif­ic or Sote­ri­o­log­i­cal sense pos­si­bly deriv­ing from an Ara­ma­ic word purk ? (ii) the notion of Sep­a­ra­tion and Dis­cern­ment that is char­ac­ter­is­tic of the Ara­bic root F‑R-Q, and (iii) Scrip­ture and revelation.

Of The Sun Set­ting In Murky Water : Qur’an­ic Com­men­tary on Sura’ Al-Kahf (18):86

Crit­ics of this verse should be aware that the Qur’an is not descrip­tive prose, and the words of the Qur’an is of high poet­i­cal elo­quence, some­thing which the Bible is not able to claim. Since the beau­ty of the Qur’an is in its poet­i­cal nature, there­fore it is only nat­ur­al that the Qur’an uses emphat­ic expres­sions to describe some­thing like a ​“sun­set”. Keep in mind that the Qur’an is in poet­i­cal prose and is meant to be a chal­lenge to the pagan Arabs in Mec­ca who prid­ed them­selves as writ­ers of good poet­ry. Those neo­phytes who like to use this verse as a stick to beat Islam with should try to study the Ara­bi­an Lit­er­a­ture and His­to­ry of that peri­od before com­ing up with sil­ly conclusions.

The Con­cep­tion of Jesus & The Per­vert­ed Mis­sion­ary Claims

The Chris­t­ian mis­sion­ar­ies are tra­di­tion­al­ly known for their bla­tant abuse and mis­in­ter­pre­ta­tions of the text of the noble Qur’an with the most dis­gust­ing and lurid inter­pre­ta­tions imag­in­able. One par­tic­u­lar mis­sion­ary, Sam Shamoun, has con­tin­ued this ​“fine” tra­di­tion of his pre­de­ces­sors by impos­ing his per­vert­ed and repul­sive under­stand­ing of the con­cep­tion of Jesus(P) on the Qur’an­ic text which describes the inci­dent. Our attempt here is to refute this mis­sion­ary from the exeget­i­cal and lex­i­cal sources made avail­able to us, insha’allah.

Insights Into Sura’ At-Tauba

Surat-ul-Tau­ba which is the 9th Chap­ter of the Qur’an was revealed 15 months before the Prophet’s(P) demise. Before its rev­e­la­tion, Mus­lims used to fol­low a very wise pol­i­cy, that is ​“If they charge thee with false­hood, say : my work to me, and yours to you ye are free from respon­si­bil­i­ty for what I do, and I for what ye do!” (Holy Qur’an 10:41). But the poly­the­ists were not sat­is­fied with this pol­i­cy and they did not refrain from treach­er­ous acts against Mus­lims, that was why the com­mand to pun­ish these groups came, and this is the dis­charge from God and His Apos­tle. Mis­sion­ar­ies con­cen­trate upon a piece of verse and ignore the rest of the passage.

When the Evan­ge­list Becomes a Shaikh, the Angels Become Wor­ship­pers of Adam

When the Evan­ge­list becomes a Shaikh, the angels become poly­the­ists, wor­ship­ping Adam instead of Allah. When the Evan­ge­list becomes a Shaikh, the Nasikh becomes Man­sukh, the Mut­laq becomes Muqayyad and the ​‘Aamm becomes Makhsus, and vice-ver­sa. Not that it is not hilar­i­ous to read for Evan­ge­lists-turned-Shaikhs. It is at the dis­cov­ery of the lev­el of hor­rif­ic con­fu­sion and plain errors con­tained in the ​“fatawa” of the many Evangelists/​Shaikhs who sprung up in recent years that inten­si­fies one’s amaze­ment and baf­fle­ment, espe­cial­ly not­ing the lev­el of pub­lic­i­ty the writ­ings of the new Shaikhs receive in the west­ern media.

Qur’an 4:125 and Christoph Heger’s Ignorance

Asif Iqbal This is with ref­er­ence to Christoph Heger’s exe­ge­sis on Sura’ 4:125. The cor­rect ren­der­ing of Qur’an 4:125 is : ​“And who is there that has…

Qur’an­ic Com­men­tary on Sura’ An-Nis­sa’ (4):89

Recent­ly, we hear Chris­tians mak­ing strange claims about Sura’ An-Nis­sa’ (4):89, by say­ing that it is a verse meant to be applied as a…

Lat­est articles

Nabeel Qureshi (1983 – 2017): The Shock­ing Truth Behind a Man­u­fac­tured​“Ex-Mus­lim” Martyr

Op-Ed Mohd Elfie Nieshaem Juferi -
Nabeel Qureshi died at the age of 34 years old in 2017 from a ​“rare and dead­ly form of stom­ach can­cer” on 16th of Sep­tem­ber 2017 with mixed reactions. 

Paul Says That Mark Is Futile : No Res­ur­rec­tion In Mark’s Gospel

The Bible Ibn Anwar -
But the first of the four gospels, i.e., the Gospel accord­ing to Mark, appar­ent­ly did not receive Paul’s memo. And this is a very impor­tant point as we keep in mind that each of the gospels were ini­tial­ly divorced from each oth­er and were writ­ten in dif­fer­ent local­i­ties for dif­fer­ent audiences.

The Gospels’ Accounts Regard­ing the Call of the First Disciples

Bible Con­tra­dic­tions Mohd Elfie Nieshaem Juferi -
So which is the cor­rect Gospel account con­cern­ing the choice of Jesus’ first apos­tles ? The fol­low­ing Bible con­tra­dic­tion was extract­ed from an unpub­lished the­sis enti­tled Ibn Hazm On The Doc­trine of Tahrif which cites Kitab al-Fasl fi al-Milal wa al-Ahwa’ wa al-Nihal and insha’allah this will be part of an ongo­ing series to repro­duce extracts of Ibn Hazm’s crit­i­cisms of the Bible and Christianity.

Follow us on:

About bismika allahuma

Bismika Allahuma: Muslim Responses To Anti-Islam Polemics is dedicated to Muslim apologetics and responses to Christian missionary efforts and Christian apologetics. We address and refute common misrepresentations of Islam, largely spread by Christian missionaries, Christian polemicists, and their Islamophobic allies who actively promote Islamophobia. Through scholarly analysis and well-reasoned arguments, we respond to attacks on Islam by figures such as David Wood, Hassamo Shamoun, Nabeel Qureshi, and Robert Spencer, along with anti-Islamic platforms like Answering Islam, Ali Sina, and Jihad Watch. Bismika Allahuma’s commitment to Islamic apologetics defends Islam’s integrity and encourages informed, respectful discourse. Join us in advancing a truthful and balanced understanding of Islam in today’s global discourse.

© 2003–2025 Bismika Allahuma: Muslim Responses to Anti-Islam Polemics. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Privacy Policy. Independent and non-sponsored.