Paul of Tar­sus : The Clear-Cut Hypocrite

Tera Tak Adamar

We read the fol­low­ing teach­ings of the so-called apos­tle” from Tar­sus, Paul, writ­ten in his epis­tles as follows :

If pos­si­ble, so far as it depends on you, be at peace with all men. Nev­er take your own revenge, beloved, but leave room for the wrath of God, for it is writ­ten, Vengeance is Mine, I will repay.” (Romans 12:18 – 19

Anoth­er teach­ing which Paul had writ­ten is :

Bear with each oth­er and for­give what­ev­er griev­ances you may have against one anoth­er. For­give as the Lord for­gave you. (Col 3:13)

A sum­ma­ry of the above record­ed state­ments by Paul :

  • Be at peace with all men. 
  • Nev­er take your own revenge, beloved !
  • Bear with each oth­er and for­give what­ev­er griev­ances you may have against one another. 

We admit that these are all beau­ti­ful teach­ings. The ques­tion now, how­ev­er, is did Paul him­self put these very same teach­ings of his into effect ? As it so hap­pens, we beg to differ !

Paul’s Hypocrisy Revealed

We read in Acts that :

And after some days Paul said to Barn­abas, Let us return and vis­it the brethren in every city in which we pro­claimed the word of the Lord, and see how they are.” And Barn­abas was desirous of tak­ing John, called Mark, along with them also. But Paul kept insist­ing that they should not take him along who had desert­ed them in Pam­phylia and had not gone with them to the work. And there arose such a sharp dis­agree­ment that they sep­a­rat­ed from one anoth­er, and Barn­abas took Mark with him and sailed away to Cyprus. (Acts 15:36 – 40

It is clear that Paul and Barn­abas had had a sharp dis­agree­ment and lat­er part­ed com­pa­ny because of that same dis­agree­ment. So Paul was not fol­low­ing what he had preached, name­ly to “…be at peace with all men” (Romans 12:18).

We also observe that Paul had not for­giv­en John (called Mark) for hav­ing aban­doned him and Barn­abas at Pam­phylia (Acts 15:38) and opposed Barn­abas’ plan to take John with him. Appar­ent­ly Paul had amne­sia with regard to his teach­ing, for­give what­ev­er griev­ances you may have against one anoth­er. For­give as the Lord for­gave you” (Col. 3:13). So why did not Paul for­give John for aban­don­ing him earlier ?

Fur­ther, regard­ing revenge, this snake taught that Nev­er take your own revenge, beloved!” (Romans 12:19) but yet Paul him­self took his revenge against John (called Mark) by refus­ing to take him in the jour­ney. So again we ask, why did Paul seek his revenge against John when he had clear­ly for­bid­den this ? He is no doubt a clear-cut hyp­ocrite, through and through !

On a relat­ed side­note, this snake also has used Jesus’(P) name in his teach­ings when in real­i­ty it is not orig­i­nal­ly from Jesus(P), but from his own con­coc­tion. For exam­ple, in 1 Corinthi­ans 15:6, Paul taught that the res­ur­rect­ed Christ had appeared to over five hun­dred breathren at one time but this episode is not avail­able in the Gospels. Anoth­er proof is in Acts 20:35, where­by Paul cites, remem­ber the words of the Lord Jesus how he said, It is more blessed to give than to receive”. This cita­tion is cer­tain­ly not from Jesus(P) because nowhere in the Gospels is this quote to be found and attrib­uted to Jesus(P). This same snake has also urged all the Jews amongst the Gen­tiles to for­sake Moses(P), he told them not to cir­cum­cise their chil­dren, nei­ther to walk after the cus­toms (Acts 21:21), this goes against what Jesus(P) him­self taught. But sad­ly, the Chris­t­ian mis­sion­ar­ies and Chris­tians in gen­er­al have tak­en this hyp­ocrite as their apos­tle” and they gen­er­al­ly behave like him as well.

Con­clu­sions

It is very clear from the above expo­si­tion that Paul was a hyp­ocrite, and hence, how could the Chris­t­ian mis­sion­ar­ies expect Mus­lims to accept this snake as a legit­i­mate fol­low­er” of the Mes­si­ah Jesus(P), the son of Mary ? Paul clear­ly told oth­ers to make peace but he him­self did not prac­tice what he had preached when he had a sharp dis­agree­ment with Barn­abas and they part­ed com­pa­ny (Acts 15). This total­ly con­tra­dicts what he had ear­li­er taught, name­ly be at peace with all men” (Romans 12:18) and for­give what­ev­er griev­ances you may have against one anoth­er. For­give as the Lord for­gave you.” (Col. 3:13)

He had also tak­en his revenge upon John (called Mark) because John had desert­ed them in Pam­phylia and had not gone with them to the work, as record­ed in Acts 15, even though he told the Romans, Nev­er take your own revenge, beloved!” (Romans 12:19). It seem that it was Barn­abas who was more reli­gious than Paul because he did not take his revenge upon John.

Which leads us to the question :

    If Paul him­self has failed to fol­low what he had taught, would he indeed fol­low what Jesus(P) had taught ?

And only God knows best. Paul of Tarsus: The Clear-Cut Hypocrite 1

[cite]

TAGS