Bismika Allahuma Muslim Responses to Anti-Islam Polemics

The Qur’an Can­not Be A Text of Divine Origin

Hesham Azmy

The Bible | Bismika Allahuma Team | November 26, 2006
The Qur’an Can­not Be A Text of Divine Origin

The Chris­t­ian mis­sion­ar­ies tend to make the gen­er­al con­clu­sion that the Qur’an can­not be a text of divine ori­gin because of the unac­cept­able mean­ings includ­ed in it. Per­haps they are cor­rect in this con­clu­sion and we may be inclined to agree with them due to the fol­low­ing rea­sons, which are :

    1. The Qur’an does not say a prophet slept with his daugh­ters.Gen­e­sis 19:30 – 38

    2. The Qur’an does not say a prophet slept with his neigh­bour’s wife and plot­ted to kill him2 Samuel 11:1 – 27

    3. The Qur’an does not say a prophet wor­shipped the Gold­en Calf.Exo­dus 32:1 – 6

    4. The Qur’an does not say a prophet changed his reli­gion, wor­shipped idols and built for them tem­ples.1 Kings 11:1 – 13

    5. The Qur’an does not say a prophet told lies and that God deceived and destroyed anoth­er prophet.1 Kings 13:1 – 30

    6. The Qur’an does not say David, Solomon and Jesus were orig­i­nal­ly bas­tards from the seed of Pharez, son of Judah.Gen­e­sis 38:12:30

    7. The Qur’an does not say the first­born of the Great Prophet who was the first­born of God slept with his step­moth­er.Gen­e­sis 35:22 and 49:3 – 4

    8. The Qur’an does not say the sec­ond son of the same Great Prophet (first­born of God) slept with his daugh­ter-in-law.Gen­e­sis 38:12:30

    9. The Qur’an does not con­tain lurid details and explic­it pornog­ra­phy involv­ing men of Assyr­ia and whores from Egypt.Ezekiel 23

    10. The Qur’an does not say John the Bap­tist, who was the great­est Israelite Prophet ever accord­ing to Jesus — though the least in the king­dom of God was greater than him ! — failed to rec­og­nize his sec­ond lord on earth, although this lord fol­lowed him and got bap­tized by him. At least not until he saw the third god descend­ing on this sec­ond god as a pigeon.Matthew 3:13 – 17, Mark 1:9 – 11 and Luke 3:21 – 22

    11. The Qur’an does not say the apos­tle of this god, Judas Iscar­i­ot, who per­formed many mir­a­cles in his name and was among the dis­ci­ples who were greater than Moses and oth­er Israelite Prophets accord­ing to Jesus, deliv­ered his god to the hands of his ene­mies for 30 pieces.Matthew 26:14 – 16, 27:3 – 9, Mark 14:10 – 11, Luke 22:3 – 6 and John 18:1 – 5

    12. The Qur’an does not say Caiaphas, the high priest — who was a prophet accord­ing to John the Bap­tist — reject­ed, insult­ed and made a ver­dict to kill his god.Matthew 26:57:68, Mark 14:53 – 65, Luke 22:54 – 71 and John 18:12 – 24

For all the above rea­sons, we con­clude that the Qur’an, unlike the Bible, can­not be a text of divine origin. The Qur'an Cannot Be A Text of Divine Origin 1


52 comments on “The Qur’an Can­not Be A Text of Divine Origin

  1. DingDong

    truth”- “…we are talk­ing about Chris­tians priests who con­vert to Islam”

    u have just been giv­en a list of Chris­t­ian priests who have con­vert­ed to Islam. Why dont you address that first ? Instead, you keep beat­ing around the bush.… otherwise,we will not get any­where, truth”.

  2. Truth

    I we are talk­ing about Chris­tians priests who con­vert to Islam, how about Imams who con­vert into Chris­t­ian ? Don’t tell me that they don’t under­stand Koran.

  3. islamispeace

    Hel­lo Marriyah,

    Thank you for your prompt reply. I apol­o­gize that I was not so prompt in mine.

    First and fore­most, I would like to answer your ques­tion regard­ing Islam and peace. Islam does talk about peace, both the peace we get from wor­ship­ping God and peace with oth­er peo­ple. With regard to the lat­ter, I believe Surah 8:61 answers your ques­tion. It talks about mak­ing peace with one’s ene­mies. The ene­mies here are those attack Mus­lims or per­se­cute them. Whether you may or may not know, Islam’s posi­tion on war is that it is allowed only when there is per­se­cu­tion against Mus­lims. When the ene­my which per­se­cutes us asks for peace, then we are oblig­at­ed to seek peace. Surah 8:58 – 62 states the following :

    If thou fear­est treach­ery from any group, throw back (their covenant) to them, (so as to be) on equal terms : for Allah loveth not the treacherous.
    Let not the unbe­liev­ers think that they can get the bet­ter (of the god­ly): they will nev­er frus­trate (them).
    Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your pow­er, includ­ing steeds of war, to strike ter­ror into (the hearts of) the ene­mies, of Allah and your ene­mies, and oth­ers besides, whom ye may not know, but whom Allah doth know. What­ev­er ye shall spend in the cause of Allah, shall be repaid unto you, and ye shall not be treat­ed unjustly.
    But if the ene­my incline towards peace, do thou (also) incline towards peace, and trust in Allah : for He is One that heareth and knoweth (all things).
    Should they intend to deceive thee,- ver­i­ly Allah suf­ficeth thee : He it is That hath strength­ened thee with His aid and with (the com­pa­ny of) the Believers ;

    These vers­es should suf­fice for an answer to your ques­tion, which was a good one.

    Con­cern­ing the sto­ry of Lot, you said the following :

    first­ly the sto­ry about Lot you have recit­ed cor­rect­ly but this is not a pos­i­tive event and in fact when God floods the world does he not do it due to such sin that is going on.”

    I apol­o­gize but I do not under­stand what you are try­ing to say. Please clarify.

    Con­cern­ing David and Bathshe­ba, yes you are cor­rect to say that God sent the prophet Nathan to repu­di­ate David for his behav­ior. How­ev­er, this is still not suf­fi­cient. The prob­lem Mus­lims have with this sto­ry is why would God choose a man who acts in such despi­ca­ble ways as His rep­re­sen­ta­tive to the chil­dren of Israel ? David makes all these prayers in the Book of Psalms, which are sup­posed to serve as inspi­ra­tion for the believ­ers, and yet he behaves like a sex­u­al deviant ? As a Mus­lim, I have a hard time believ­ing that David com­mit­ted adul­tery, and then was not pun­ished accord­ing to the laws of the Torah ! Why was he not exe­cut­ed as the Torah com­mands ? Are peo­ple of pow­er above the law ? Leviti­cus 20:10 is crys­tal clear on the pun­ish­ment for adultery :

    If a man com­mits adul­tery with anoth­er man’s wife — with the wife of his neigh­bor — both the adul­ter­er and the adul­ter­ess must be put to death.

    This applies to David specif­i­cal­ly because Bathshe­ba was lit­er­al­ly his neigh­bor’s wife, was she not ? Even if she was not, he still com­mit­ted adul­tery and thus should have been exe­cut­ed. Why was he not ? Why did­n’t Nathan remind him of the laws of the Torah ? It is because of these dis­crep­an­cies that Mus­lims reject the sto­ry as false. We do not believe that David com­mit­ted adul­tery. We believe he was a man of God and would not dream of com­mit­ting some­thing as vile as adultery.

    You also said the following :

    sor­ry can i just add in rela­tion to the sto­ry about Lot i did­nt make this clear b4 but it was­nt Lot who slept with his daugh­ters will­ing­ly, Lot was made drunk and then his daugh­ters had sex with him this is a good rea­son why you should­nt drink to exc­cess. so real­ly it was his Daugh­ters who weren’t Pro­hets in any way as Pro­het­dom is not passed down through blood. there­fore the belief that a prophet slept with his daugh­ters is in fact wrong.”

    Is not get­ting drunk a sin ? Why would Lot allow his daugh­ters to give him so much alco­hol, know­ing the appar­ent pro­hi­bi­tion against get­ting drunk, espe­cial­ly after he wit­nessed God’s awe­some pow­er in the destruc­tion of Sodom and Gamor­rah ? I don’t believe that Lot would get drunk. I think he would have known bet­ter. There­fore, I reject the sto­ry as false.

    Thank you for offer­ing your views on this sub­ject. I have enjoyed con­vers­ing with you.

  4. startucuus

    No body who tru­ly under­stands Chris­tian­i­ty would fol­low Islam” .…??

    A brief” list of for­mer Chris­t­ian Priests and Mis­sion­ar­ies who have Embraced Islam.…

    Viach­eslav Polosin — For­mer Arch­priest of the Russ­ian Ortho­dox Church who heads the admin­is­tra­tion of the Com­mit­tee on Rela­tions with Pub­lic Asso­ci­a­tions and Reli­gious Orga­ni­za­tions of the State Duma of the Russ­ian federation
    Abdul­lah al-Faruq — For­mer­ly Ken­neth L. Jenk­ins, min­is­ter and elder of the Pen­te­costal Church
    Dr. Jer­ald F. Dirks — For­mer min­is­ter (dea­con) of the Unit­ed Methodist Church. He holds a Mas­ter’s degree in Divin­i­ty from Har­vard Uni­ver­si­ty and a Doc­tor­ate in Psy­chol­o­gy from the Uni­ver­si­ty of Den­ver. Author of The Cross and the Cres­cent : An Inter­faith Dia­logue between Chris­tian­i­ty and Islam (ISBN 1590080025 — Amana Pub­li­ca­tions, 2001). He has pub­lished over 60 arti­cles in the field of clin­i­cal psychology
    Anselm Tormee­da — 14th cen­tu­ry CE schol­ar and priest
    Khadi­jah Sue’ Wat­son — For­mer pas­tor, mis­sion­ary, pro­fes­sor. Mas­ter’s degree in Divinity
    Ibrahim Khalil — For­mer Egypt­ian Cop­tic priest
    Mar­tin John Mwaipopo — For­mer Luther­an Archbishop
    Raphael — For­mer Jeho­vah’s Wit­ness minister
    George Antho­ny — For­mer Catholic priest
    Abdul-Ahad Dawud (David Ben­jamin Kel­dani) — from Catholi­cism, for­mer Roman Catholic priest of the Uni­ate-Chaldean sect schol­ar from Har­vard & a for­mer dea­con of Unit­ed Methodist church
    Yusuf Estes — from Chris­tian­i­ty, for­mer pas­tor & prison chaplain
    Dr. J. Nichol­son — PhD in Theology

    Last and CERTAINLY not least…

    Abdul-Ahad Omar (Dr. Gary Miller) — from Chris­tian­i­ty, for­mer priest & mis­sion­ary admin­is­tra­tion of the Com­mit­tee on Rela­tions with Pub­lic Asso­ci­a­tions & mathematician

  5. cahaya

    Faruh Rehan, do you real­ly under­stand Chris­tian­i­ty that well ? You lie.

  6. Marriyah

    I agree with the above how­ev­er call­ing oth­er reli­gions unbe­liev­ers i dont think is right as we have some­thing to believe in we just don’t believe in Islam, There is a rea­son why the largest reli­gion in the world is Chris­tian­i­ty we are believ­ers in the pow­er of God and Jesus Christ and all the good they brought into the world. The only parts of the QUR’AN that are rep­utable are the parts lift­ed from the torah and the bible. The Torahs divin­i­ty was proved in the bible and the bibles divin­i­ty is proved in the prophe­cies made in the torah two examples

    Born in Beth­le­hem : Mic­ah 5:2.… Matthew 2:1.… Luke 2:4 – 7.
     — Mic.5:2 But you, Beth­le­hem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose ori­gins are from ancient times.
     — Mt.2:1 After Jesus was born in Beth­le­hem in Judea, dur­ing the time of King Herod, Magi from the east came to Jerusalem. (Lk.2:4 – 7)
    To be born of a Virgin :
    Isa­iah 7:14, Matthew 1:18.… Luke 1:26 – 35.
     — Isa.7:14 There­fore the Lord him­self will give you a sign : The vir­gin will be with child and will give birth to a son, and will call him Immanuel.
     — Mt.1:18 This is how the birth of Jesus Christ came about : his moth­er Mary was pledged to be mar­ried to Joseph, but before they came togeth­er, she was found to be with child through the Holy Spir­it. (Lk.1:26 – 35)

    But where is the prophe­cy about Mohammed or the last prophet ? If the qur’an was divine then it would have been proph­e­sised and Jesus’ death and sta­tus as the son of God would have been accept­ed in it. Why would God send Jesus to speak of peace and then send Mohammed to speak of war ?

    No body who tru­ly under­stands Chris­tian­i­ty would fol­low Islam.

  7. Surah 109-Unbelievers

    Say : Oh ye Unbelievers !
    I wor­ship not that which ye worship,
    And ye do not wor­ship that which I worship ;
    I shall nev­er wor­ship that which ye worship,
    Nei­ther will ye wor­ship that which I worship.
    To you be your reli­gion ; to me my religion.”

    I believe this is appro­pri­ate here… God has told us to leave the unbe­liev­ers to wor­ship as they wish.… for they will no more fol­low our faith than we will fol­low theirs.

  8. Faruh Rehan

    To Faith : Oh yes I do under­stand Chris­tian­i­ty well, very well in a mat­ter of fact, and thats why I am a Muslim.

Comments are closed.