The Christian missionaries tend to make the general conclusion that the Qur’an cannot be a text of divine origin because of the unacceptable meanings included in it. Perhaps they are correct in this conclusion and we may be inclined to agree with them due to the following reasons, which are :
- 1. The Qur’an does not say a prophet slept with his daughters.
2. The Qur’an does not say a prophet slept with his neighbour’s wife and plotted to kill him
3. The Qur’an does not say a prophet worshipped the Golden Calf.
4. The Qur’an does not say a prophet changed his religion, worshipped idols and built for them temples.
5. The Qur’an does not say a prophet told lies and that God deceived and destroyed another prophet.
6. The Qur’an does not say David, Solomon and Jesus were originally bastards from the seed of Pharez, son of Judah.
7. The Qur’an does not say the firstborn of the Great Prophet who was the firstborn of God slept with his stepmother.
8. The Qur’an does not say the second son of the same Great Prophet (firstborn of God) slept with his daughter-in-law.
9. The Qur’an does not contain lurid details and explicit pornography involving men of Assyria and whores from Egypt.
10. The Qur’an does not say John the Baptist, who was the greatest Israelite Prophet ever according to Jesus — though the least in the kingdom of God was greater than him ! — failed to recognize his second lord on earth, although this lord followed him and got baptized by him. At least not until he saw the third god descending on this second god as a pigeon.
11. The Qur’an does not say the apostle of this god, Judas Iscariot, who performed many miracles in his name and was among the disciples who were greater than Moses and other Israelite Prophets according to Jesus, delivered his god to the hands of his enemies for 30 pieces.
12. The Qur’an does not say Caiaphas, the high priest — who was a prophet according to John the Baptist — rejected, insulted and made a verdict to kill his god.
For all the above reasons, we conclude that the Qur’an, unlike the Bible, cannot be a text of divine origin. 
This is my personal opinion. For Muslims, they are proud if they can finish reading the Koran (“khatam”) severals times. The question is, are they really understand the contents and the teachings ? for me as a Christian, it’s very hard for me even to COMPLETE and UNDERSTAND one chapter. because you can’t understand the bible without the guidance of Holy Spirit and you have to pray for it. for me that’s why i believe the Holy Bible is Holy and divine text. come on, if you can finish it so easily, than it’s no more than comics book and school textbooks.
Why we judge sins of the past when in front of our eyes, it still happen ? Do we hv the right and power to judge others religion ? Those who are sinless cast the first stone. I assume that all Muslims who only know to attack other religion (to defend their faith??? i don’t think so..) are sinless and you guys NEVER lie, NEVER drunk, NEVER think about sex, is it ? WOW…impressive. then you are at the same level as God, sinless and HOLY..Dream on!!!
Ding dong please read Cahaya’s point i feel it may make more sense to you, the fact of the matter is that the story of Lot did occur but he is not a Prophet and neither were his daughters (previously i did think that Lot was a Prophet to you which is why i called him a Prophet out of respect but i have since been corrected) so the story is untrue as it is titled a above as a prophet sleeping with his daughters.
Sorry if i didnt make myself clear enough. and yes he was made drunk and they did sleep with him I dont c whats complicated. The act of sleeping with someone when they have been made drunk is different to sleeping with someone willingly is it not.
Marriyah
Can you please listen to yourself ?
1. Lot was made drunk and then his daughters had sex with him
2. therefore the belief that a prophet slept with his daughters is in fact wrong
What???
sorry can i just add in relation to the story about Lot i didnt make this clear b4 but it wasnt Lot who slept with his daughters willingly, Lot was made drunk and then his daughters had sex with him this is a good reason why you shouldnt drink to exccess. so really it was his Daughters who weren’t Prohets in any way as Prohetdom is not passed down through blood. therefore the belief that a prophet slept with his daughters is in fact wrong.
First of all, let me just point out that the Bible is a historical account of God’s dealing with his people … the good, the bad and the ugly.
For islamispeace and Terrence, don’t just read what is presented here about the bible. The bible has nothing to hide about the sins of God’s people. Read those references in context and see for yourself if the accounts are as lurid as claimed here. If there are “lurid” details, read also what happened to those people involed in those lurid acts.
Another thing, when Muslims say “prophets” of the bible, don’t you blindly agree on their definition of a prophet. Lot was never a prophet, and neither was Caiaphas the high priest.
I still maintain that the Koran is not divine. If the Koran is indeed the final revelation from God, and is supposed to make clear all the previous books of God, how is it that the Koran cannot get the stories that are also found in the Bible right ? And how can Muhammad simply declare that Jesus was never crucified when that event is a matter of historical fact ?
Thank-you Islami peace for your reply and i hope i can successfully answer your questions. Firstly Yes you are quite right these two stories do take place in the bible, and i dont dispute that my issue is with selecting these passages and not telling the full story… firstly the story about Lot you have recited correctly but this is not a positive event and in fact when God floods the world does he not do it due to such sin that is going on.
The story of Bathsheba and David is a case of intended misinterpretaion firstly yes the story is true but if you read on to the next section (in my bible just under it) God sends the Prophet Nathan to punish David for his sin and the punishment lies in the death of his son (2samuel 12 16 – 23. Another is shown when we are all supposed to be idol worshippers, firstly these jews were the same ones freed from Egypt who were misguided in their religion and needed something i which to focus so aaron took all the gold and melted it and moulded it into the shape of a Bull/Calf they styarted worshipping it and offering it gifts, whilst this was going on Moses was on the mountain collecting the ten commandments, when God saw what his people were doing he was angery and (exodus 13) wanted to destroy them Moses pleaded for their lives and returned to his people witrh the ten commandments which taught them how to worship unlike their pagan Egyptian keepers (which was all they knew)
Im not trying to dispute whether or not these events took place im angery that the full story has been cut in order to paint a negative picture of Christianity when your trying to prove the divinity of the Qur’an why cant you just focus on the Qur’an or tell the truth the whole truth the complete story.
Therr are many negative sides of religion fopr example sites like Ali Sinas which says that your Prophet married a 6 – 9 year old child, raped a jewish woman named Safiya and spoke the words of satan in his hours of doubt is this true… or is it a fabrication, I dont know but I dont write in to web sites where i dont know the truth and yet give my praise for anothers lies against any religion, and Im glad that you have done some research but others who just congratulate what they want to hear makes me angery.
Thats my only issue with this page by Azmy.
Thanks again for your reply…
Can i ask question that no one has been able to answer for me im not being funny im asking a general question but where does the Qur’an speak of peace. because on most of the web pages that i have been on even the muslim ones they dont say when they do its about peace to your muslim bros and sis and not to others so please reply with answer, im genuinly wanting to know.
Marriyah,
Kindly show how the “facts we blindly accepted are clearly fake.” You say they are fake, but you don’t say why. Sorry, but this will not count as an intelligent response. Are you saying that the Bible does not say that a prophet slept with his daughters ? The story is well-known. Lot’s daughters get him drunk and then have sex with him. Is this not what the Bible says ? Does not the Bible describe how David slept with Bathsheba, and then sent her husband out to war so that he may be killed and thus leave Bathsheba for David ? Are you saying that the Bible does not say these things ? Kindly reply.