The Chris­t­ian mis­sion­ar­ies tend to make the gen­er­al con­clu­sion that the Qur’an can­not be a text of divine ori­gin because of the unac­cept­able mean­ings includ­ed in it. Per­haps they are cor­rect in this con­clu­sion and we may be inclined to agree with them due to the fol­low­ing rea­sons, which are :

    1. The Qur’an does not say a prophet slept with his daugh­ters.Gen­e­sis 19:30 – 38

    2. The Qur’an does not say a prophet slept with his neigh­bour’s wife and plot­ted to kill him2 Samuel 11:1 – 27

    3. The Qur’an does not say a prophet wor­shipped the Gold­en Calf.Exo­dus 32:1 – 6

    4. The Qur’an does not say a prophet changed his reli­gion, wor­shipped idols and built for them tem­ples.1 Kings 11:1 – 13

    5. The Qur’an does not say a prophet told lies and that God deceived and destroyed anoth­er prophet.1 Kings 13:1 – 30

    6. The Qur’an does not say David, Solomon and Jesus were orig­i­nal­ly bas­tards from the seed of Pharez, son of Judah.Gen­e­sis 38:12:30

    7. The Qur’an does not say the first­born of the Great Prophet who was the first­born of God slept with his step­moth­er.Gen­e­sis 35:22 and 49:3 – 4

    8. The Qur’an does not say the sec­ond son of the same Great Prophet (first­born of God) slept with his daugh­ter-in-law.Gen­e­sis 38:12:30

    9. The Qur’an does not con­tain lurid details and explic­it pornog­ra­phy involv­ing men of Assyr­ia and whores from Egypt.Ezekiel 23

    10. The Qur’an does not say John the Bap­tist, who was the great­est Israelite Prophet ever accord­ing to Jesus — though the least in the king­dom of God was greater than him ! — failed to rec­og­nize his sec­ond lord on earth, although this lord fol­lowed him and got bap­tized by him. At least not until he saw the third god descend­ing on this sec­ond god as a pigeon.Matthew 3:13 – 17, Mark 1:9 – 11 and Luke 3:21 – 22

    11. The Qur’an does not say the apos­tle of this god, Judas Iscar­i­ot, who per­formed many mir­a­cles in his name and was among the dis­ci­ples who were greater than Moses and oth­er Israelite Prophets accord­ing to Jesus, deliv­ered his god to the hands of his ene­mies for 30 pieces.Matthew 26:14 – 16, 27:3 – 9, Mark 14:10 – 11, Luke 22:3 – 6 and John 18:1 – 5

    12. The Qur’an does not say Caiaphas, the high priest — who was a prophet accord­ing to John the Bap­tist — reject­ed, insult­ed and made a ver­dict to kill his god.Matthew 26:57:68, Mark 14:53 – 65, Luke 22:54 – 71 and John 18:12 – 24

For all the above rea­sons, we con­clude that the Qur’an, unlike the Bible, can­not be a text of divine origin. The Qur'an Cannot Be A Text of Divine Origin 1

Comments

52 responses to “The Qur’an Can­not Be A Text of Divine Origin”

  1. islamispeace Avatar
    islamispeace

    Broth­er AlHaidar, thank you for the kind words. I agree with you that Mus­lims must step up and answer the ques­tions raised by non-Mus­lims against Islam. In order to do this, we need to study the issues. Knowl­edge is an indis­pens­able weapon in the face of igno­rance. I dis­agree with you that our reli­gion has been under attack for only the past six years. It has been under attack from the forces of evil since the very begin­ning. Those who oppose the truth have tried to extin­guish it through var­i­ous means : polemics, vio­lence, col­o­niza­tion etc. But Islam will go on, no mat­ter how much the unbe­liev­ers hate it, inshaAllah.

  2. david misango Avatar

    Inter­est­ing dis​cus​sions​.It seems to me that for the Qur’an to be tru­ly divine, one must show” that the Bible is false!Therefore- NO BIBLE, NO QURAN !

  3. AlHaidar Avatar
    AlHaidar

    I also thank god for peo­ple like ISLAMISPEACE, they are foun­tains of knowl­edge, and we must absorb as much as we can from them. Many times Chris­t­ian broth­ers have asked me cer­tain ques­tions to try and con­fuse me. We all need to study like some of the broth­ers and sis­ters on this site so we may give them a prop­er answer. I enjoyed read­ing your respons­es to Mariyyah, and I appre­ci­ate Mariyyah being a mature per­son inter­est­ed in Reli­gion, and will­ing to learn. Mariyyah was obvi­ous­ly mis­in­formed, or pre­ob­a­bly stum­bled on a Anti-islam site. It is sad that there are so many polemics, espe­cial­ly on Islam. Our reli­gion has been under attack ever for the past six years, and will con­tin­ue. We must open the eyes of the peo­ple and let them know the truth about our religion.

    I like to let peo­ple of oth­er faiths smell my fam­i­lies Jug of Zam Zam water. Its been in my Refridger­a­tor for over a year and it still smells like a gar­den of ros­es :) subhanillah

  4. RS Avatar
    RS

    The Qur’an does not say the sec­ond son of the same Great Prophet (first­born of God) slept with his daughter-in-law

    You are right instead the Koran says THe Great­EST” prophet slept with his daugh­ter in law.

    [33:37] Recall that you said to the one who was blessed by GOD, and blessed by you, Keep your wife and rev­er­ence GOD,” and you hid inside your­self what GOD wished to pro­claim. Thus, you feared the peo­ple, when you were sup­posed to fear only GOD. When Zeid was com­plete­ly through with his wife, we had you mar­ry her, in order to estab­lish the prece­dent that a man may mar­ry the divorced wife of his adopt­ed son. GOD’s com­mands shall be done.

    Waht dif­fer­ence does the Koran have com­pared to the Bible​.You clowns say tht the Bible and the Torah were cor­rupt­ed , hence The Koran was sent down to man. Fine, then if this Koran is the corredt­ed vrsion of the Torah and Bible, it should­n’t con­tain any of the cor­rrup­tions con­tained in both this texts!What cor­rup­tion by the way ? What mis­take or dis­tor­tion in the Bible doess the Koran aim to cor­rect ? That a man can’t sleep with his real son’s wife but it s okay if he sleeps with his Adopt­ed son’s divorced wife.Wat Big dif­fer­ence does it make ? Nothing.