Category: Miraculous Features

  • Have They No Under­stand­ing Of Ara­bic Grammar ?

    They certainly have no inkling about the development of a language, whether it is Arabic or otherwise; grammar was not the machine that produced the Arabic language, rather it is simply a logical explanation to ways of Arabic speech. Due to their inherent stupidity, the Christians do not recognize the correct historicity of its chronological…

  • Surah al-Anbiyaa:30 and the Mis­sion­ary Felix Culpa

    Recently the world's most maladroit missionaries have allowed an impromptu piece to be published in response to Shabbir Ally's views on Surah al-Anbiyaa: 30. Personally I do believe that Shabbir's interpretation is wrong, albeit he was not the first Muslim to proffer such a cosmological hypothesis on this particular Holy Ayaah. However I feel that…

  • Cos­mol­o­gy and the Holy Qur’an : A Response to Richard Carrier

    This paper is intended to respond to atheistic criticism as proposed by Richard Carrier, in a rather large piece that is in my personal opinion and understanding, replete with errors and misunderstandings with regards to basic cosmological concepts, the Islamic viewpoint, as well as history. I also address a few polemics that were put forward…

  • Reli­gious Scrip­ture and Sci­ence, Con­flict or Con­cil­i­a­tion ? A Mus­lim Perspective

    Reli­gious Scrip­ture and Sci­ence, Con­flict or Con­cil­i­a­tion ? A Mus­lim Perspective

    Tran­script of speech at Inter­faith Dia­logue 4, organ­ised by MMU Mela­ka PART 1 Bis­mil­lahir Rohmanir Rohim. In the name of Almighty God, Most Gra­cious, Most Mer­ci­ful. Alham­dulil­lahi Rob­bil ?Alamin. All praise is due to Him alone, The Lord, Cher­ish­er and Sus­tain­er of the Universe. The Chair­per­son, Dis­tin­guished Guests, Learned Speak­ers, Broth­ers and Sis­ters, I wel­come you…

  • Response To Claims Made Against The Elo­quence of the Qur’an

    Intro­duc­tion This arti­cle was writ­ten to exam­ine the lan­guage of the Qur’an and the cir­cum­stances sur­round­ing it, in ref­er­ence to its super­nat­ur­al elo­quence. We will also at the same time scru­ti­nize a post­ing by a Chris­t­ian apol­o­gist, Pete Nash — or oth­er­wise known as Kip Rid­er, which attacks the elo­quence claim of the Qur’an and see whether it stands…