Tag : moral law

Kant­ian Phi­los­o­phy From An Islam­ic Viewpoint

Immanuel Kant (1724−1804) as a philoso­pher not only sought his own answers to philo­soph­i­cal ques­tions but was also an expert on the his­to­ry of phi­los­o­phy. Hav­ing a thor­ough ground­ing in the philo­soph­i­cal tra­di­tion of the past, he was keen­ly aware of the stand­points of ratio­nal­ists and empiri­cists. He believed that both were part­ly right and part­ly wrong in that the ratio­nal­ists laid too much empha­sis on con­tri­bu­tion of rea­son and empiri­cists on sen­so­ry expe­ri­ence. It has been the­o­rized that Kant want­ed to pre­serve the basis for Chris­t­ian faith. He was a Protes­tant and since the days of Ref­or­ma­tion, Protes­tantism has been char­ac­ter­ized by its empha­sis on faith.

Lat­est articles

Nabeel Qureshi (1983 – 2017): The Man­u­fac­tured Mar­tyr of Chris­t­ian Apologetics

Op-Ed Mohd Elfie Nieshaem Juferi -
Nabeel Qureshi died at the age of 34 years old in 2017 from a ​“rare and dead­ly form of stom­ach can­cer” on 16th of Sep­tem­ber 2017 with mixed reactions. 

Paul Says That Mark Is Futile : No Res­ur­rec­tion In Mark’s Gospel

The Bible Ibn Anwar -
But the first of the four gospels, i.e., the Gospel accord­ing to Mark, appar­ent­ly did not receive Paul’s memo. And this is a very impor­tant point as we keep in mind that each of the gospels were ini­tial­ly divorced from each oth­er and were writ­ten in dif­fer­ent local­i­ties for dif­fer­ent audiences.

The Gospels’ Accounts Regard­ing the Call of the First Disciples

The Bible Mohd Elfie Nieshaem Juferi -
So which is the cor­rect Gospel account con­cern­ing the choice of Jesus’ first apos­tles ? The fol­low­ing Bible con­tra­dic­tion was extract­ed from an unpub­lished the­sis enti­tled Ibn Hazm On The Doc­trine of Tahrif which cites Kitab al-Fasl fi al-Milal wa al-Ahwa’ wa al-Nihal and insha’allah this will be part of an ongo­ing series to repro­duce extracts of Ibn Hazm’s crit­i­cisms of the Bible and Christianity.

Follow us on:

About bismika allahuma

Bismika Allahuma: Muslim Responses To Anti-Islam Polemics is dedicated to Muslim apologetics and responses to Christian missionary efforts and Christian apologetics. We address and refute common misrepresentations of Islam, largely spread by Christian missionaries, Christian polemicists, and their Islamophobic allies who actively promote Islamophobia. Through scholarly analysis and well-reasoned arguments, we respond to attacks on Islam by figures such as David Wood, Hassamo Shamoun, Nabeel Qureshi, and Robert Spencer, along with anti-Islamic platforms like Answering Islam, Ali Sina, and Jihad Watch. Bismika Allahuma’s commitment to Islamic apologetics defends Islam’s integrity and encourages informed, respectful discourse. Join us in advancing a truthful and balanced understanding of Islam in today’s global discourse.

© 2003–2025 Bismika Allahuma: Muslim Responses to Anti-Islam Polemics. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Privacy Policy. Independent and non-sponsored.