From the begin­ning of Ori­en­tal­ism, the Chris­t­ian mis­sion­ar­ies have been assum­ing that Islam is head­less” enough to be attacked and scru­ti­nized with a feroc­i­ty that one can only con­clude bor­ders on fanati­cism. These mis­sion­ar­ies proved then that they do not have the brains to acknowl­edge their own headless­ness. One such exam­ple is David Wood, a recent zeal­ous recruit by the ever-intol­erent Answer­ing Islam, whose only amaz­ing abil­i­ty is his extreme bel­liger­ence, and what can only be described as fanat­i­cal intol­er­ence, towards a faith dif­fer­ent from his. This is a review of one such arti­cle.

Mr. Wood begins by saying :

    Muham­mad’s empire of faith has man­aged to thrive in the mod­ern world for one sim­ple rea­son : Mus­lims have kept Muhammad?s dark past a secret. Indeed, they have gone beyond keep­ing it a secret ; they have some­how con­vinced them­selves (and many oth­ers) that Muham­mad was an out­stand­ing moral exam­ple, per­haps even the great­est moral exam­ple of all time. Per­pet­u­at­ing this fraud has been, in my opin­ion, the most stu­pen­dous decep­tion in world history.

We are sure that it has been such a very large secret” that the inci­dents exposed” in Mr. Wood’s bel­liger­ent piece were actu­al­ly record­ed in some recent con­tem­po­rary biogra­phies of the Prophet Muham­mad(P). Mr. Wood should con­sid­er read­ing the late Mar­tin Ling’s Muham­mad : His Life Based on the Ear­li­est Sources”, M. H. Haykal’s The Life of Muham­mad” and anoth­er book, The Sealed Nec­tar” and see whether these emi­nent writ­ers have con­cealed even a frac­tion of the Prophet’s(P) life.

Yet Mr. Wood con­tin­ue to per­sist in this mind­less big­otry, and says :

    The dif­fi­cul­ty here is that, no mat­ter how loud­ly a Mus­lim shouts these objec­tions, they have no pow­er to over­come the his­tor­i­cal fact that Muham­mad was a rob­ber and a murderer.

One should not throw stones at glass hous­es, and sim­i­lar­ly one could say the fol­low­ing for the Judeo-Chris­t­ian faith :

    The dif­fi­cul­ty here is that, no mat­ter how loud­ly a Jew/​Christian shouts these objec­tions, they have no pow­er to over­come the his­tor­i­cal fact that Moses was a rob­ber and a murderer.

Mr. Wood has not proven any­thing apart from an asser­tion that, in his view, what the Prophet(P) did was rob­bing and murdering”.

The fol­low­ing are some of the claims that he has charged against the Prophet(P). Do note the nature of the polem­i­cal trend employed by Mr Wood. They are nei­ther new” nor have they not been dis­cussed or answered aeons ago. What we will do here is to repro­duce some of the charges, and pro­vide a link to a fur­ther dis­cus­sion on the issue. This is to demon­strate to Mr. Wood and his mis­sion­ary pals that their tired, old rep­e­ti­tions are not unfa­mil­iar to us, and to send a mes­sage that we are not inter­est­ed in rein­vent­ing the wheel and waste our time in respond­ing.

The fol­low­ing are some of the claims that were made.

Claim #1 : When Muham­mad began receiv­ing his rev­e­la­tions, his first impres­sion was that he was pos­sessed by demons

Ver­dict : Manip­u­la­tion of Facts

This was dis­cussed by Al-Nowai­hi, who notes that :

It is impor­tant to real­ize that when that search cul­mi­nat­ed in his hear­ing the voice of Gabriel in Mount Hira, at the age of forty, he did not has­ten to believe in his rev­e­la­tion or become con­vinced of it overnight. He passed through a peri­od of con­sid­er­able doubt and fear, ter­ri­fied lest it be only the wicked trick and cru­el jest­ing of Satan, and he need­ed the whole­heart­ed sup­port of his faith­ful wife Khadi­ja to over­come his fears. I ven­ture to sug­gest that this was an attes­ta­tion of his integri­ty ; a delib­er­ate impos­tor bent upon decep­tion would not have gone through those ago­niz­ing ter­rors. Fur­ther­more, a care­ful read­ing of the ear­ly suras of the Qur’an shows that, even after he was con­vinced of the authen­tic­i­ty of his rev­e­la­tion, it was only with great reluc­tance that he accept­ed the awe­some bur­den of his mis­sion, and only after he was dri­ven by an over­pow­er­ing sense of the duty which he could not shirk.

(For more on the Chris­t­ian mis­sion­ary abuse of the Fatrah inci­dent, see The Fatrah : Inter­mis­sion of the Prophet Muham­mad)

Claim #2 : Muham­mad sup­port­ed his fledg­ling reli­gion by rob­bing people

Ver­dict : Manip­u­la­tion of Facts

(For more on the leg­is­la­tion and begin­ning of jihad, see The Leg­is­la­tion and the Begin­ning of Jihad)

Claim #3 : Muham­mad was often ruth­less towards his adversaries

Ver­dict : Falsehood

On the con­trary, the Prophet(P) was always gen­tle and treat­ed his ene­mies kind­ly, and this is a fact recog­nised by the most vir­u­lent of his con­tem­po­rary enemies.

(For more refu­ta­tions to accu­sa­tions of the so-called bru­tal­i­ty” of the Prophet(P), see What About The Killing of Ka’ab bin Al-Ashraf ? and The Killing of Abu Afak and Asma’ bint Mar­wan ?)

Claim #4 : Muham­mad had far more wives than even his own rev­e­la­tions allowed

Ver­dict : Manip­u­la­tion of Facts

The injunc­tion on the lim­i­ta­tion of wives does not apply to the Prophet’s(P) wives. As they had attained a high stature in the Mus­lim com­mu­ni­ty of believ­ers (Ummul Muk­minin or Moth­ers of the Believ­ers), it would be noth­ing short of an injus­tice to deprive them of their sta­tus by divorc­ing them and hence con­demn them to humil­i­a­tion. For the Prophet’s(P) mar­riages, a sep­a­rate law was giv­en to him, name­ly that he may not mar­ry any more women after this rev­e­la­tion was revealed.

(For more on the Prophet Muham­mad’s wives, see Why Was The Prophet Polyg­a­mous ?)

Claim #5 : Muham­mad con­sum­mat­ed a mar­riage to a nine-year-old girl

Ver­dict : Manip­u­la­tion of Facts

(For more on Muham­mad’s rela­tion­ship with Aisha, see The Young Mar­riage of Aishah)

Claim #6 : Muham­mad had a con­temptible opin­ion of women

Ver­dict : Out­right Falsehood

(For more on the Islam­ic view of women, see The Posi­tion of Women in Islam)

Claim #7 : Muham­mad is unique among prophets in that he is the only one to receive a rev­e­la­tion, pro­claim it as part of God’s mes­sage to man, and lat­er take it back, claim­ing that it was actu­al­ly from Satan.

Ver­dict : Out­right Falsehood

(For more on the Ori­en­tal­ist fan­ta­sy regard­ing this unau­then­tic tra­di­tion, see Those Are Their High-Fly­ing Lies Indeed)

Hence from these mere selec­tive claims”, Mr Wood tries to con­clude that :

    These are just some of the facts that Mus­lims have been keep­ing secret, but they are enough to make any rea­son­able per­son doubt the valid­i­ty of Islam.

On the con­trary, the alle­ga­tions that were hurled and repeat­ed ad nau­se­am by the mis­sion­ary is noth­ing new. They have been dis­cussed, debat­ed, and refut­ed by Mus­lim and non-Mus­lim schol­ars time and time again. Mr. Wood is per­haps igno­rant of the copi­ous amount of mate­r­i­al on these issues and who can blame him ? Per­haps he has been liv­ing in a mono-cul­ture all his life and has nev­er come across a sin­gle Mus­lim on the street.

    The truth about Muham­mad has been one of the world’s best-kept secrets. For cen­turies, it has been vir­tu­al­ly impos­si­ble to raise objec­tions about the char­ac­ter of Muham­mad in Mus­lim coun­tries, for any­one who raised such objec­tions would (fol­low­ing the exam­ple set by Muham­mad him­self) imme­di­ate­ly be killed.

And it was pos­si­ble to raise issues of doubt about the char­ac­ter of Jesus(P) in the Span­ish Inqui­si­tion and Cru­sades era, for exam­ple ? Mr. Wood is try­ing to pull wool” over his read­er’s eyes, with­out a doubt.

Con­clu­sions

We will not make secret of the fact that review­ing Mr. Wood’s arti­cle (not to men­tion his series of Chris­t­ian bel­liger­ent non­sense) has been noth­ing but a most tire­some exer­cise. Mr. Wood tries to cast the illu­sion as though crit­i­cism” of the Prophet(P) is some­thing for­eign or alien to the Mus­lim world. On the con­trary, attack­ing Islam has been as old as the found­ing of Islam itself and crit­i­cism” of the Prophet(P) as old as Ori­en­tal­ism itself.

We also demand evi­dence from Mr. Wood about his claim that any­one who raised such objec­tions would…immediately be killed”. What is the proof of his sweep­ing state­ment ? In which coun­tries are these peo­ple killed for their crit­i­cism” and what is the nature of their so-called crit­i­cism”?

Yet Mr. Wood con­tin­ues with :

    In the end, Islam will fall, for the entire struc­ture is built upon the belief that Muham­mad was the great­est moral exam­ple in his­to­ry, and this belief is demon­stra­bly false.

Unfor­tu­nate­ly for Mr. Wood, Islam does not rise or fall on a sin­gle indi­vid­ual. It is true that the Prophet Muham­mad is held in the high­est esteem. It is actu­al­ly more true to say the fol­low­ing about Christianity :

    In the end, Chris­tian­i­ty will fall, for the entire struc­ture is built upon the belief that Jesus was the God-incar­nate, and this belief is demon­stra­bly false.

Indeed, count­less indi­vid­u­als and groups have secret­ly wished for Islam’s down­fall from past to present. How­ev­er, we are not dis­turbed by the secret desires of Mr. Wood and his bel­liger­ent Chris­t­ian mis­sion­ary pals to see Islam’s destruc­tion. There is no rea­son to believe that Mr. Wood and his pals will suc­ceed where their more knowl­edge­able” pre­de­ces­sors in the likes of Mar­goli­uth, Muir, Zwem­mer and Pfan­der had failed before.

And with that, we say that only God knows best ! Wood Chopped Down: The Information Superhighway and the Nonsense of Christian Missionary Belligerence 2

Cite Icon Cite This As : 
. (October 18, 2005). Wood Chopped Down : The Infor­ma­tion Super­high­way and the Non­sense of Chris­t­ian Mis­sion­ary Belligerence. Retrieved from .

Comments

42 responses to “Wood Chopped Down : The Infor­ma­tion Super­high­way and the Non­sense of Chris­t­ian Mis­sion­ary Belligerence”

  1. Brandon Avatar
    Brandon

    And it was pos­si­ble to raise issues of doubt about the char­ac­ter of Jesus(P) in the Span­ish Inqui­si­tion and Cru­sades era, for exam­ple ? Mr. Wood is try­ing to pull wool” over his reader’s eyes, with­out a doubt.”
    My wife has Chris­t­ian ances­tors who were mur­dered by Roman Catholics dur­ing the Inqui­si­tion. They took a cru­ci­fix affixed to the end of a sword and rammed down their throat.
    You may not lever­age the actions of sin­ful human beings as being com­mand­ed of God – espe­cial­ly when Scrip­ture con­demns such behav­ior. Love your ene­mies and pray for those who per­se­cute you” come to mind.
    I would encour­age you not to con­fuse Catholi­cism with Christianity.
    We know that Muham­mad was a false prophet because 1) He claimed God has no Son and 2) The new tes­ta­ment, which Muham­mad affirmed, affirms that you must repent and believe in the Son of God to save you from the wrath of God. 3) If the Bible is false, Islam is false because Islam affirms the Gospel. 4) If the Bible is true, Islam is false because the Gospel con­demns Islam. 5) There has been no cor­rup­tion of the Gospel because we have exam­ples of the Gospels that pre­date Muham­mad and they agree with the man­u­scripts that we have now. 6) No known tex­tu­al vari­ant sig­nif­i­cant­ly mod­i­fies any major Chris­t­ian doc­trine. At the least 1) Jesus real­ly died at the cru­ci­fix­ion 2) Jesus real­ly rose from the dead 3) You must repent of your sin and trust only in Jesus to save you. 4) Jesus is God 5) You can­not earn God’s favor by per­form­ing works. You sinned against God. How can you expect any work you pro­duce to undo that which is offen­sive to God ? If you vio­lent­ly mur­der some­one, how can you undo it ? Look, judge, I do great things. I’ve done all these great things!” A good judge would throw that out because you’re not being judged on your good works but on what laws you have bro­ken. Any­one who has ever sinned (includ­ing Muham­mad) requires a sav­ior from their sin. If we reject our only way to be made right with God, then we remain con­demned before God. Please don’t rely on sup­press­ing the truth. Since when has sup­press­ing the truth ever lead any­one to the truth ? Cry out to Jesus to save you from your sin. He loves you ! <3

  2. Saint Gundy Avatar
    Saint Gundy

    The author should chal­lenge Wood to a debate. Chop him down in per­son, rather than hid­ing behind an article.