Bismika Allahuma Muslim Responses to Anti-Islam Polemics

Do Mus­lims Wor­ship The Black Stone of the Kaaba ?

Mohd Elfie Nieshaem Juferi

History | Bismika Allahuma Team | October 15, 2005
Do Muslims Worship The Black Stone of the Kaaba? 1

ExHin­du” (in response to an expla­na­tion regard­ing the Black Stone) wrote[dead link]:

    Give any expla­na­tion you want. I dont buy it. Arabs have been kiss­ing that rock long before Mo[sic]. I call that IDOL Wor­ship­ping. You can label me as Islam­o­phobe and I am proud that you give me that label. In the same man­ner, I anoint you a Hinduphobe. 

I find it rather iron­ic to see some­one who uses the moniker ExHin­du” accus­ing yours tru­ly of being a Hindu­phobe”. After all, what does the use of the Inter­net user­name ExHin­du” real­ly sig­ni­fy ? A case of the pot call­ing the ket­tle black, we can­not real­ly say. 

Nev­er­the­less, I believe that it is time that a response to this rather annoy­ing polemic about the nature of the Black Stone (al-Hajar al-Aswad) and its sig­nif­i­cance in Islam by those who have an axe to grind about Islam (or oth­er­wise known ten­der­ly as the Islam­o­pho­bics”) is final­ly needed. 

We will look at the com­mon alle­ga­tions about the Black Stone and then seek to address the mat­ters con­cerned, insha’Allah.

[toc]

Phys­i­cal Descrip­tion of the Black Stone (al-Hajar al-Aswad)

First, we shall describe the phys­i­cal nature of the Stone itself. The Black Stone (Ar : ٱلْحَجَرُ ٱلْأَسْوَد‎, al-Hajar al-Aswad) is built into the Kaa­ba wall, at the east­ern cor­ner of the Kaa­ba, about 5 ft. above the ground lev­el, not very far from the door of the Kaa­ba. The Kaa­ba itself can itself be described as a black box, which Mus­lims face in dai­ly prayers. 


Black Stone Kaaba

Mus­lims believe that the Black Stone was orig­i­nal­ly giv­en to Abra­ham, who built the Kaa­ba used the Black Stone as a cor­ner stone for the struc­ture. Abra­ham and Ish­mael taught the ear­ly Makkan Arabs monothe­ism ; after the pass­ing of Abra­ham and Ish­mael, the Makkan Arabs with time regressed into pagan prac­tices includ­ing idol wor­ship. They end­ed up hav­ing a pan­theon of gods, despite the orig­i­nal mes­sage of Abra­ham and Ish­mael which taught the ear­ly Arabs to wor­ship God alone (monothe­ism).Safi-ur-Rah­man Al-Mubarakpuri, Ar-Rahee­qul-Makhtum (Darus­salam, 2002), pp. 26 – 28

Going back to the Black Stone, it was orig­i­nal­ly a sin­gle piece of rock but today­con­sists of three large pieces and sev­er­al small frag­ments (in which it was for­mer­ly bro­ken) stuck togeth­er and sur­round­ed by a large ring of stone, which in turn is held togeth­er by a sil­ver band.

black stone front and side

Swiss trav­eller Johann Lud­wig Bur­ck­hardt vis­it­ed Mec­ca in 1814, and pro­vid­ed a detailed descrip­tion as follows :

It is an irreg­u­lar oval, about sev­en inch­es [18 cm] in diam­e­ter, with an undu­lat­ed sur­face, com­posed of about a dozen small­er stones of dif­fer­ent sizes and shapes, well joined togeth­er with a small quan­ti­ty of cement, and per­fect­ly well smoothed ; it looks as if the whole had been bro­ken into as many pieces by a vio­lent blow, and then unit­ed again. It is very dif­fi­cult to deter­mine accu­rate­ly the qual­i­ty of this stone which has been worn to its present sur­face by the mil­lions of touch­es and kiss­es it has received. It appeared to me like a lava, con­tain­ing sev­er­al small extra­ne­ous par­ti­cles of a whitish and of a yel­low sub­stance. Its colour is now a deep red­dish brown approach­ing to black. It is sur­round­ed on all sides by a bor­der com­posed of a sub­stance which I took to be a close cement of pitch and grav­el of a sim­i­lar, but not quite the same, brown­ish colour. This bor­der serves to sup­port its detached pieces ; it is two or three inch­es in breadth, and ris­es a lit­tle above the sur­face of the stone. Both the bor­der and the stone itself are encir­cled by a sil­ver band, broad­er below than above, and on the two sides, with a con­sid­er­able swelling below, as if a part of the stone were hid­den under it. The low­er part of the bor­der is stud­ded with sil­ver nails.Bur­ck­hardt, Johann Lud­wig (1829). Trav­els in Ara­bia, Com­pre­hend­ing an Account of Those Ter­ri­to­ries in Hed­jaz which the Mohammedans Regard as Sacred. Hen­ry Col­burn, New Burling­ton Street. p. 250

It was nar­rat­ed that Ibn Abbaas said : The Mes­sen­ger of Allah (peace and bless­ings of Allah be upon him) said : The Black Stone came down from Par­adise.“Nar­rat­ed by al-Tir­mid­hi, 877 ; al-Nasaa’i, 2935. The hadith was classed as saheeh by al-Tir­mid­hi.

Mate­r­i­al of the Black Stone

The mate­r­i­al of the Black Stone has not been pre­cise­ly deter­mined. It is some­times clas­si­fied as lava and some­times as basalt. The rea­son for this dif­fi­cul­ty is that its vis­i­ble sur­face is worn smooth by hand-touch­ing, etc.Refer, for exam­ple, to the pro­file sketch of the Black Stone giv­en by Ali Bey : Trav­els, Vol. ii (Lon­don 1816), p. 76, to note its sur­face hol­lowed out in undu­la­tions. Its esti­mat­ed diam­e­ter is approx­i­mate­ly 12See al-Bata­nuni, al-Rih­la al-Hazi­ah, Cairo (1329 AH), p. 105. Its colour is red­dish black with red and yel­low particles.

silver frame around the black stone

Some Islam­o­phobes have begun a base­less attack on the appear­ance of the Black Stone by alleg­ing that it looks like a vagi­na in order to insult Mus­lims. The sil­ver frame around the Black Stone were for cen­turies main­tained by the Ottoman Sul­tans in their role as Cus­to­di­an of the Two Holy Mosques. This sil­ver frame is a mod­ern addi­tion and the struc­ture look dough­nut shaped as a result. The frames wore out over time due to the con­stant han­dling by pil­grims and were peri­od­i­cal­ly replaced. 

It is report­ed that when the Prophet Muham­mad(P) entered the city of Makkah as a vic­to­ri­ous leader, there were 360 idols around the Kaa­baSee Sahih Bukhari, Vol­ume 5, Book 59, Num­ber 583 (Muhsin Khan’s tr.). The Prophet(P) then had the For­bid­den Sanc­tu­ary (the precinct around the Kaa­ba prop­er) cleansed of all these idols and pro­claimed Monothe­ism in its true, most ele­vat­ed and pris­tine form. 

Thus say­ing that Mus­lims wor­ship the Black Stone as an idol” is clear­ly the most absurd thing ever pro­nounced in the his­to­ry of mankind.

Sig­nif­i­cance of the Black Stone

From a phys­i­cal per­spec­tive, there­fore, the Black Stone does not have any spe­cial sig­nif­i­cance or importance. 

Umar(R), lat­er to become the sec­ond Caliph of Islam, is report­ed to have said that he ful­ly real­ized that the Black Stone was mere­ly a stone and thus had no pow­er of its own to harm or ben­e­fit any­oneSee this state­ment in var­i­ous nar­ra­tives, such as : Sahih Bukhari, Vol­ume 2, Book 26, Num­bers 667, 675 (Muhsin Khan’s tr.); Sahih Mus­lim, Book 007, Num­ber 2914 (Abdul Hamid Sid­diqui’s tr.); Sunan an-Nasa’i (Ara­bic ver­sion), Vol. ii, p. 38, etc..

As for the rea­sons as to why we have the Black Stone in the wall of the Kaa­ba, we read about the fol­low­ing rea­sons, that :

    (a) it sym­bol­izes the start­ing-point dur­ing the cir­cum­am­bu­la­tion of the Ka’abah, thus facil­i­tat­ing the remem­brance of the num­ber of circumambulations.
    (b) at this point, the Mus­lims, who are close to the Kaa­ba (dur­ing their cir­cum­am­bu­la­tion) touch the stone, while those who are away from it, raise their hands towards it, sym­bol­iz­ing the renew­al of their pledge of alle­giance with the Lord of the Kaa­ba. In this sym­bol­ic expres­sion, the Black Stone is tak­en as a sym­bol of an oath on the hand of God.See the details of this point in M. Hamidul­lah, Intro­duc­tion to Islam, para­graph 181/​a, Karachi 1969

And with this, it is clear that this base­less asser­tion of Islam­o­phobes is refut­ed. And only God knows best ! Do Muslims Worship The Black Stone of the Kaaba? 2

Cite This As :
Cita­tion copied !

23 comments on “Do Mus­lims Wor­ship The Black Stone of the Kaaba ?

  1. abdullah

    we kiss the stone because the prophet did. and the prophet is the per­fect exam­ple for mus­lims and god com­mand­ed the mus­lims to fol­low and obey the prophet. we trust the prophet. the black stone is believed to be orig­i­nat­ing from heav­en, so, out of respect for the stone and trust in the prophet, we kiss it.

    if mus­lims had wor­shiped the stone, umar would­n’t have said that the stone is just a stone and could­n’t ben­e­fit nor harm us. this is because it is con­sid­ered blas­phe­my when say­ing tis about some­thing you worship.

    we pray towards mec­ca because god com­mand­ed us to. sure, mec­ca had been holy since before muham­mad because the first per­son who built it was abraham.

    is it wrong to do things the prophet did if god says he’s the per­fect exam­ple for muslims ?

    and i like Emil­i­a’s exam­ple of the bread and jesus’s body. i believe it’s called eucharist ? eat­ing the eucharist does­n’t mean they’re wor­ship­ing it.

    the hajar-ul-aswad is just a piece of stone. it does­n’t have the pow­er to ben­e­fit or harm peo­ple. God has all those pow­er, but not the stone. :D

  2. Kjartan

    I must admit that one aspect of the Islam­ic reli­gion which amus­es me is that Mec­ca is the holy city … but it was holy long before Mohammed was born. The (now) Islam­ic tem­ple, the Kaa­ba, was the main spir­i­tu­al object of the poly­the­is­tic Arabs who pre­dat­ed Mohammed. Yes, he had his lit­tle cer­e­mo­ni­al destruc­tion of the idols around the Kaa­ba in order to sig­ni­fy the destruc­tion of poly­the­ism and the tri­umph of monothe­ism, but recall that Mohammed had at first tried to make Jerusalem the city to bow down to and pray towards (real­ly, such rigid­ly rit­u­al­is­tic behav­ior is akin to idol­a­try — the rit­u­al (as the idol) becomes of greater actu­al (if not nom­i­nal) impor­tance than the intan­gi­ble spir­tu­al feel­ing” of reli­gion), but since peo­ple had for count­less pre­vi­ous gen­er­a­tions been mak­ing pil­grim­ages to the Kabaa, Mohammed sim­ply sub­mit­ted to pop­u­lar pres­sure and announced one day that the object of spir­i­tu­al ven­er­a­tion was hence­forth to be, big sur­prise, Mec­ca and the Kaa­ba tem­ple. I believe ExHin­du was try­ing to point out that many Mus­lims ACT in a man­ner con­sis­tent with treat­ing the Kaa­ba as an idol, what­ev­er they pro­fess. Of course, since one of their mantras is that there is but one God,” they don’t think of them­selves as act­ing in such a man­ner, but the human mind has been rife with con­tra­dic­tion since the first man walked the earth.
    Undoubt­ed­ly such a man of con­tra­dic­tion was Mohammed him­self, since he showed the utmost ingrat­i­tude to the Jews who were kind enough to allow him to lodge in Med­i­na … but then, I’m giv­ing him the ben­e­fit of the doubt by call­ing him con­tra­dic­to­ry, oth­er­wise I’d sim­ply call him a mate­ri­al­is­tic oppor­tunist. So, I real­ly shouldn’t be sur­prised to see con­tra­dic­tori­ness in his followers.

  3. justAnInfidel

    I’m not try­ing to be argu­men­ta­tive but the ques­tion was­n’t answered. We know that Muhammed was not a poly­the­ist, we know that some Mus­lims, such as the wab­bists make very strong and ratio­nal argu­ments against the belief of saints and the like. So why pay any atten­tion to a black stone that can­not speak for those who kissed/​touched it.

    It also does­n’t explain why this stone ought to be ven­er­at­ed at all — which it seems to be (again not try­ing to be argu­men­ta­tive). It holds much more sig­nif­i­cance than a counter. A fur­ther ques­tion ques­tion — my igno­rance — why pray towards Mec­ca when god is everywhere ?

  4. Emilia

    Hi. I’m a mus­lim, although i’m not very spir­i­tu­al in that sense. Prophet Muham­mad kissed the stone. Hence why Umar kissed the stone as well and in time, fol­lowed by Mus­lims. My two cents would be this ; if you feel that by kiss­ing the stone you are idol­is­ing the stone, then please do not kiss the stone. Prophet Muham­mad could kiss the stone and not idolise it at the same time because his faith is strong. We are only human and our faith could be weak and we could be swayed.

    Although i do think that Mus­lims should stop the habit of kiss­ing the stone. What was a sim­ple ges­ture has turned into an overzeal­ous habit that could deem, and some­times is, one form of idol­is­ing and it is HARAM in Islam.

    To non-Mus­lims, please under­stand that the stone was once kissed by Prophet Muham­mad, and to us Mus­lims, it is sacred. Same rea­son as why the Chris­tians eat the bread that sym­bol­is­es the body of Christ, and same rea­son why Hin­dus believes the mouse is Gane­sha’s avatar.

    It’s not log­ic (how could an ele­phant ride a tiny mouse, how could a bread sig­ni­fy the body of Christ, and how could a stone be of such significant).

    They are just symbolism.

  5. g

    If you don’t wor­ship the stone why do you kiss it ? Did muhammed kiss the stone ? If he did, then isn’t this rit­u­al done out of emu­la­tion and thus idol­is­ing muhammed ?
    I don’t want to offend any­one but it seems as if the seper­a­tion of god and muhammed in Islam sup­ports an unques­tioned paci­fism to do any­thing and every­thing for god, but when real­ly, in truth, it is immi­ta­tion of muham­mads actions and rituals.
    I’m not an islama­phobe or what­ev­er but I think that there are cracks in Islam. I also feel that if you want to stop hav­ing to call peo­ple islama­phobes more should be done to edu­cate the une­d­u­cat­ed. NOT for the pur­pose of con­vert­ing the world, but to fur­ther gods inter­ests by unit­ing all dif­fer­ent faiths by way of want­i­ng, sin­cere­ly, to get to know each oth­er. I think that islam lim­its this. by way of labelling who­ev­er oppos­es islam or see’s some­thing not entire­ly right as an infedel or ene­my. Any com­ments or reply would be well received.

  6. Name

    You post does not explain why Mus­lims still fol­low an old Ara­bi­an rit­u­al of kiss­ing the stone. Indeed, if Omar him­self could­n’t tell, I don’t think you can. It’s just a poly­the­is­tic habit car­ried over to Islam, just like most of the Hajj rituals.

  7. Xman

    Kiss­ing some­one or some­thing does NOT mean that you wor­ship it or show sub­mis­sion to it. As you have said, it is main­ly out of love.

    Mus­lims also kiss the Quran or the hands of old Shaykhs or relics that are known to be from the Prophet peace be upon him.

    Why do you mis­sion­ar­ies ALWAYS go around mis­rep­re­sent­ing such sim­ple things acts into some­thing much more sin­is­ter. Your dis­tor­tions of Islam only show how much your hatred of it affects your sensibilities !

  8. dav

    Hi, I love my wife, I hugn kiss her to show my affec­tion for her. I hug and kiss my chil­dren because I love them. Malays have a cus­tom to kiss the hand of their par­ent in respect. The sub­jects of Sul­tans kiss­es his mejesty’s hand in submitsiveness/​homage to their king. So what is the sig­nif­i­cant of kiss­ing the black stone mean ? Show of affec­tion to the black store ? Show of love for the stone ? Show of respect for the black stone ? Show of sub­mis­sion to the black stone ?

    [Admin — Kiss­ing your wife and chil­dren does not mean that you WORSHIP them or take them as gods.]

Comments are closed.