Dr. Habib Siddiqui

Hajj: Reflection on Its Rituals

No annu­al event on the face of the globe, reli­gious or non-reli­gious, com­pares to hajj in terms of the sheer num­ber of par­tic­i­pants, dura­tion of the event and the breadth of agen­da. In spite of this fact, it has always remained equal­ly fas­ci­nat­ing and mys­te­ri­ous to not only non-Mus­lims, who are barred from enter­ing the holy city, but also to mil­lions of Mus­lims, who had not per­formed hajj.

What then is hajj ? In essence, hajj is man’s evo­lu­tion toward Allah ; his return to Him. It is a sym­bol­ic demon­stra­tion of the phi­los­o­phy of cre­ation of Adam (AS : alay­his salam), the first man. To fur­ther illus­trate this, it may be stat­ed that the per­for­mance of hajj is a simul­ta­ne­ous show or exhib­it of many things. It is a show of cre­ation. It is a show of his­to­ry. It is a show of uni­ty. It is a show of Islam­ic ide­ol­o­gy. It is a show of Ummah, the com­mu­ni­ty of Mus­lims. That is why, it is said in the Qur’an :

And pro­claim unto mankind the hajj …. That they may wit­ness things that are of ben­e­fit to them.“Qur’an, 22 : 27 – 8

Just as in any oth­er good show or movie or the­atre-play, the fol­low­ing con­di­tions pre­vail in hajj. Allah is the Stage Man­ag­er. The theme por­trayed is the actions of these main char­ac­ters –- Adam, Haw’a (Eve), Ibrahim (Abra­ham), Hajar (Hagar), Isma’il (AS), and Shay­tan (Satan). The main scenes are –- Masjid al-Haram, Arafat, Mas’a (space between the moun­tains -– Safa and Mar­wa), Mash’ar (area between Arafat and Mina) and Mina. Impor­tant sym­bols are –- Ka’ba, Safa, Mar­wa, day, night, sun­shine, sun­set, idols and rit­u­als of sac­ri­fice. The dress and make-up are –- Ihram, halq and taqseer (part of cer­e­monies of hajj involv­ing cut­ting of hair and nails, afterward).

Last­ly, the play­er of the show is –- you –- the Hajji. You are the main fea­ture of the per­for­mance. The role of Adam, Ibrahim, Isma’il (Ish­mael) and Hajar in con­fronta­tion between Allah and Satan is all played by you. As a result, you are the hero of the show !

Hajj is a duty unto Allah for mankind, for him or her who can find a way or means to get there (Qur’an 3:97). It is not a tax on your wealth, but a duty. Thus, to qual­i­fy, you must be sane and wise to under­stand what you are get­ting into, and able-bod­ied to go through this task, and last­ly, have the means or resources to per­form hajj.

The rites of hajj are five – (1) Ihram, (2) wait­ing at Arafat, (3) Tawaf of the Ka’ba, (4) sa’iy or run­ning between the Safa and the Mar­wa and (5) cut­ting or trim­ming of hair. Oth­ers are not pil­lars, although some may require kaf­fara or penal­ty, if not done. The per­son who puts on the Ihram or cloth for either Umrah (less­er pil­grim­age) or hajj (greater pil­grim­age) is called a Muhrim.

The months of hajj are the three. These are the Ara­bic months of Shaww­al, Dhul-Qadah and first ten days of Dhul Hij­jah. Thus, one can­not put on Ihram before Shaww­al. Hajj and Umrah are per­formed in three ways –- ifrad, tamat­tu and qiran.

1. Ifrad involves first per­form­ing hajj and then Umrah.
2. Tamat­tu is when one first per­forms Umrah and then hajj, both in the same year with some break in between the two.
3. Qiran is when one puts on the Ihram with the inten­tion of com­bin­ing both hajj and Umrah with­out any break in between the two.

There are ten eti­quettes of hajj. These are :

    1. Requite all wrong­do­ings and sat­is­fy all adversaries.
    2. Make pro­vi­sion for hajj from one’s law­ful wealth.
    3. Learn the pil­lars of hajj and its ceremonies.
    4. Be kind and for­bear­ing with oth­ers, lest the reward be nullified.
    5. Observe the oblig­a­tions of prayers and its statutes.
    6. Be open-hand­ed, main­tain the poor and spend as much as he/​she is able to.
    7. At the sta­tion of Arafat, remem­ber the Day of Judg­ment (Yawmil Qiamat).
    8. Should not miss vis­i­ta­tion of the Prophet’s (S) grave in Madinah.
    9. After return from hajj, one should turn toward Akhi­rat (Here­after).
    10. One should remem­ber his par­ents and oth­er close rel­a­tives who have passed away with pious prayers and make-up for them if they could not ful­fill their oblig­a­tions for hajj.

The steps of hajj are the following :

Miqat -– putting on Ihram at des­ig­nat­ed places with wudhu.

The show of hajj begins with Miqat. At this point, the par­tic­i­pant must change his/​her clothes. Clothes show indi­vid­u­al­i­ty, sta­tus, pref­er­ence and dis­tinc­tion. They cre­ate super­fi­cial bar­ri­ers that sep­a­rate man from man. The con­cept of I” (and not We”) emerges which gives birth to dis­crim­i­na­tion. At Miqat you assume your orig­i­nal shape as a man”, just one of chil­dren of Adam” who will die one day. The cloth of Ihram is, there­fore, the anti-the­sis to that indi­vid­u­al­ism”, it is the kafan (or bur­ial shroud). You wear the kafan, the two pieces of cloth, just like every­one else. You join the mass, the mul­ti­tude and become noth­ing or just a drop of water in the ocean that has no spe­cial iden­ti­ty of its own. An atmos­phere of gen­uine uni­ty pre­vails every­where. It is a human show of Islam­ic uni­ty, it is a show of uni­ver­sal broth­er­hood. The bod­ies were left in Miqat and the souls are moti­vat­ed here. This is the begin­ning of your jour­ney, your voy­age to noth­ing­ness. There is no sex, no per­fume, no shoes, no sewn clothes and head cov­ers for men, no face mask, no cut­ting of hair or nails, i.e., absolute­ly no signs of aris­toc­ra­cy or dis­tinc­tion. In the state of Muhrim, you don’t even look in a mir­ror to see your own image. You don’t hunt any ani­mal, you don’t uproot any plant. So you kill the ten­den­cies of aggres­sion by being peace­ful to nature. You cease to remain or behave as some­body. Hajj is a move­ment to return­ing to Allah, just as Allah says in the Qur’an : Wa ilal-lahil maseer (24:42), mean­ing, Unto Allah is the jour­ney­ing.” All your self­ish egos must be buried at Miqat. You wit­ness your own dead body and vis­it your own grave. By sac­ri­fic­ing your indi­vid­u­al­i­ty, you focus on real­i­ty, the basic pur­pose for which you were cre­at­ed — that being a slave unto Allah. Just as when you would be buried in two pieces of cloth, leav­ing behind all your wealth and world­ly belong­ings, here in Miqat you prac­tice a dress rehearsal for that inevitable event.

It is prefer­able that you enter Makkah dur­ing the daytime.

Each step you take toward Ka’ba, your heart pounds. The weight of being close to Allah’s house seems to get heav­ier and heav­ier. You are endowed with a mixed feel­ing of love and fear. Love, because you have wait­ed this long to get here. Fear, because you don’t know whether you can endure the strain of rit­u­als of hajj, ful­fill your duty unto Allah and be born again as an inno­cent human being.

Make du’a (sup­pli­ca­tion) for Ka’ba upon see­ing it.

Remem­ber this is the Baital Haram -– the Sacred House — appoint­ed by Allah (Qur’an 5:97). This is the first house of wor­ship on the face of the globe. It is to this house that you face while pray­ing. It is also the direc­tion in which your face would be turned when you are buried as dead. It is the cen­ter of exis­tence, faith, love, uni­ty and life. It has its own his­to­ry. It is called Baitil Masabatal-lin-nass wa amana, i.e., the House of resort for mankind and a sanc­tu­ary (Qur’an 2:125). It is also called Bait­ul Atiq -– the Ancient House –- in the Qur’an (22:29). Ibrahim (AS) prayed for its secu­ri­ty and blessings.

You per­form Tawaf (cir­cum­am­bu­la­tion) of Ka’ba sev­en times, unless it is time for a reg­u­lar prayer led by an Imam, which you need to join in.

Just as plan­ets of our solar sys­tem orbit around the sun, you orbit around the world’s sun — the Ka’ba, and become part of a uni­ver­sal sys­tem. You demon­strate your love for Allah by mak­ing Tawaf around His house. Tawaf should be start­ed from the cor­ner stone -– the Black Stone, Hajr al-Aswad — with Ka’ba on the left. This is where you make a con­tract to join all the tribes of the earth, and become like a drop of water enter­ing the ocean. The moment of truth has come and you must select your path, dis­tinct from those who had reject­ed their Cre­ator. Three of the sev­en Tawafs must be at a faster pace than nor­mal walk­ing. You should try to touch the stone with hand, and put your fore­head on it and then kiss it. By touch­ing the stone, you have shown your alle­giance to your Cre­ator, who had sent this very stone from the heav­en, so that He could know your love for Him. By touch­ing the stone, you have cut off all forms of alle­giance to any­thing oth­er than Allah, you have become free again from servi­tude of men and this world. Dur­ing Tawaf, you become part of the cos­mos. You for­get about your­self. You are in love with the sym­bol of uni­ty and servi­tude to Allah. You see noth­ing but His sym­bols, the Ka’ba and the Black Stone, Hajr al-Aswad. By deny­ing your­self you have become a lover of Him just like Hajar who migrat­ed to this land, bar­ren and rugged, with­out veg­e­ta­tion, with­out any forms of sub­sis­tence, but with com­plete reliance in Her Lord, Allah (T). And Allah did not neglect either her or her infant son. He brought out the Zamzam well and let peo­ple set­tle there, mak­ing it the most impor­tant place in the Ara­bi­an penin­su­la. Remem­ber that some rit­u­als of hajj are, in real­i­ty, a mem­o­ry of Hajar. Hijrah or migra­tion is what Hajar did. Any migra­tion like hers is a move toward civilization.

Dur­ing Tawaf, every­one encir­cles the Ka’ba col­lec­tive­ly. The move­ment is of one unit and there is no indi­vid­ual iden­ti­fi­ca­tion of men or women, black or white, red or yel­low. The move­ment has trans­formed one per­son into the total­i­ty of a peo­ple”. All of the I’s” have trans­formed into We,” estab­lish­ing the uni­ver­sal­i­ty of ummah with the goal of approach­ing Allah. Like­wise, all your self-cen­tered­ness must go and trans­form into self-denial or ummah-cen­tered activ­i­ties. Allah’s way is the way of the peo­ple. In oth­er words, to approach Allah, you must first approach peo­ple. That is why, indi­vid­ual activ­i­ties in Islam are less mer­i­to­ri­ous than col­lec­tive actions. You step out of the Tawaf cycle at the same place you start­ed after com­ple­tion of the sev­en orbits. This is just like being res­ur­rect­ed from the same spot where you would be buried.

After Tawaf, per­form two rakah of prayer behind Maqam‑e Ibrahim in which you pray Surah al-Kafirun in the first rakat and Surah al-Ikhlas in the second.

Maqam is a very blessed place for pray­ingQur’an, 2:125. It is the near­est point to Allah. As a mat­ter of fact, there is no place in this entire earth where you get more reward than this place for pray­ing. The stone has the foot­print of Ibrahim (AS), the rebel against the estab­lished despot of his time, Nim­rod. He stood over this stone to lay the cor­ner stone — Hajr al-Aswad and to re-con­struct the Ka’ba and to prayQuran, 2:125. Do you now under­stand where you are stand­ing ? By stand­ing on the same stone, you vow to become like Ibrahim Han­i­fah wa Khalil-Allah, the upright friend of Allah, who was uncom­pro­mis­ing in his con­vic­tion of Tawhid. In Maqam, sym­bol­i­cal­ly, you shake hands with Ibrahim (AS) by pledg­ing the same ded­i­ca­tion to Allah -– i.e., to be like Ibrahim and Isma’il (AS), his son.

Run between the moun­tains — Safa and Mar­wa — sev­en times, start­ing with the Safa and end­ing with the Marwa.

This is called Sa’iy. Lit­er­al­ly it means search, a move­ment with an aim. It is depict­ed by run­ning and hur­ry­ing. Here you act like Hajar, the moth­er of infant Isma’il. She had no food, no water, no shel­ter, nei­ther for her­self nor for her child, but only uncom­pro­mis­ing, relent­less faith that the God of Ibrahim (AS) will not leave her and her only son with­out sus­te­nance. Remem­ber, when Ibrahim (AS) left her and their only son, Isma’il (AS) near the val­ley of Makkah, Hajar asked him : O Ibrahim, where are you leav­ing us, while there is no habi­ta­tion of men nor any pro­vi­sion for food and drink ? Who is going to look after us?” Ibrahim (AS) replied, Ilal-lah (to Allah’s pro­tec­tion only).” She said, Radi­tu bil­lah (I am ful­ly sat­is­fied with Allah?” She also asked, Have you done this to ful­fill Allah’s com­mand?” When Ibrahim (AS) con­firmed that by say­ing, Yes,” she sim­ply said, Well in that case, we have no fear, for Allah will not let us die with­out pro­vid­ing any pro­vi­sion [i.e., He will def­i­nite­ly pro­vide for us in the mid­dle of this des­o­late, bar­ren desert].” [Bukhari] Do you see the strength of her trust in Allah ? Away from the view of his wife and son, Ibrahim (AS) prayed, Our Lord : Lo ! I have set­tled some of my pos­ter­i­ty in an uncul­tivable val­ley near unto Thy Holy House (Ka’ba), Our Lord ! that they may estab­lish prop­er wor­ship. So, incline some hearts of men that they may yearn toward them, and You pro­vide them with fruits in order that they may be thank­ful.” (Qur’an 14 : 37). Soon, how­ev­er, Hajar’s water and food were all gone, there was no milk or water or any food either for her­self or for her child. She start­ed look­ing out for water, run­ning to the top of the moun­tain, Safa. No, there is no water any­where. Then she comes down and looks at her infant to check if he is fine. She then goes to the top of the oth­er moun­tain, Mar­wa, and takes a deep long look to fetch water. She was search­ing water, why ? Because it is need­ed for phys­i­cal sal­va­tion, for life to con­tin­ue. So, should man work for liveli­hood, trust­ing in Allah. She search­es again and again. After run­ning sev­en times between these two moun­tains, she comes down from Mar­wa to see the con­di­tion of her infant son. She hears the sound of gush­ing water com­ing from near her son and is sur­prised to see an angel (Jib­ril) dig a well near the heel of her infant son. The gush­ing water from the well was mak­ing all that sound. She quick­ly puts a bar­ri­er around it so that water could be stored and that it did not over­flow. And this well came to be known as the Zamzam. Muham­mad (S) said, May Allah bless the moth­er of Isma’il (AS). If she had not put that bar­ri­er around the Zamzam, instead of a well, the gush­ing water would have con­tin­ued to flow like a spring [and flood­ed the entire val­ley].” It was a gift from Allah to the moth­er and son, and all those who came lat­er. It is a min­er­al water rich with nutri­tion­al and med­i­c­i­nal pow­er to cure man of many dis­eases. The Safa and the Mar­wa, thus, became among the signs, indi­ca­tions of Allah (Qur’an 2:158).

On the sev­enth day of Dhul-Hij­jah, after the Zuhr prayer, Imam explains the mean­ing of hajj and exhorts peo­ple to go to the val­ley of Mina (near­ly six miles north of Makkah) next morn­ing after Fajr prayer.

Vis­it and stay at Mina on the eighth day (after arriv­ing there in the morn­ing) till the next Fajr (dawn prayer).

Go to Arafat after sun has risen on the ninth, stop­ping on the way at Nami­rah and lis­ten­ing to khut­bah before Zuhr (mid-day prayer).

Pro­ceed to Arafat (five miles fur­ther north) and seek Allah’s for­give­ness there till Maghrib (prayer after sunset).

Arafat lit­er­al­ly means knowl­edge and sci­ence. Arafat rep­re­sents the begin­ning of man’s cre­ation, that of our fore­fa­ther Adam. It was shay­tan who mis­led our fore­fa­ther by whis­per­ing to him say­ing : O Adam ! Shall I show you the tree of immor­tal­i­ty and pow­er that wastes not away?” (Qur’an 20:120) He caused the down­fall of Adam and Haw’a (Eve). For years, they were sep­a­rat­ed from each oth­er hav­ing descend­ed at dif­fer­ent places. It was in Arafat that they met again. It was in a small rocky hill of Jabal al-Rah­ma in the cen­ter of Arafat that their sins were for­giv­en by Allah. So, here in Arafat, you act like Adam (AS) or Haw’a and seek for­give­ness for you and your loved ones.

After sun­set pro­ceed slow­ly to Muz­dal­i­fah (halfway between Arafat and Mina) with­out pray­ing (Qur’an 2:198). How­ev­er, the Imams Abu Han­i­fah and Sufyan al-Thawri (R) said it is per­mis­si­ble to pray Maghrib before reach­ing Muzdalifah.

Spend the night before Eid in Muz­dal­i­fah. Pray Fajr ear­ly. Col­lect peb­bles there (70 per person).

Muz­dal­i­fah is part of Mash’ar-ul-Haram. Our Prophet Muham­mad (S) prayed for long dura­tion here. You must be in Mash’ar by the night­fall (while you were at Arafat dur­ing the day). Dark­ness engulfs you in Mash’ar. Arafat is knowl­edge, it requires day­light for clear vision. Mash’ar lit­er­al­ly means con­scious­ness and under­stand­ing. Such blos­som at night through deep reflec­tion or med­i­ta­tion. So, Mash’ar is the stage of insight while Arafat was the stage of expe­ri­ence. Intu­ition needs no light. It can see in the dark­ness. It is the stage between knowl­edge and love, or Arafat and Mina. Here you reflect upon your­self and strength­en your spir­it. Are you not in the right way ? Are you ready to fight against Satan or his insin­u­a­tions ? In Makkah, dur­ing tawaf you joined the crowd and became part of them. Here you are alone, despite being with­in a crowd. Here you are for your­self only. There­fore, con­fess your sins to Allah. And this night is a good cov­er for your tears. Take prepa­ra­tion for tomor­row by get­ting ready tonight. There is a great bat­tle in which you have to par­tic­i­pate tomor­row. So, col­lect your weapon­ry – the peb­bles — before the day breaks. The peb­bles will be used against your ene­my. You have to act like Ibrahim (AS) here just as he fought against the insin­u­a­tions of Satan on his way to sac­ri­fice his beloved son, Isma’il (AS).

Go back to Mina and throw sev­en stones at Jam­rat-ul Aqabah, recit­ing Tak­bir each time. The remain­der 63 stones should be thrown over the next three days of Ayyam al-Tashriq (11th, 12th and 13th of Dhul Hij­jah) at a rate of 21 stones per day. Every day, throw the first 7 stones at Jama­rah near Mina, and the last sev­en at Jama­rat al-Aqabah, locat­ed clos­er to Makkah.

The tenth day has arrived. This is the day for sac­ri­fice of ani­mal. You are armed with weapons to fight Satan, the ene­my of your fore­fa­ther, the dev­il who tried to con­fuse Ibrahim (AS). Mina lit­er­al­ly means love. Ibrahim (AS) felt too much love for his only son, Isma’il (AS). And Allah want­ed to test how great or how real his love was for Him. Ibrahim (AS) saw a vision of sac­ri­fic­ing his most beloved son. That was the com­mand from Allah to test Ibrahim (AS) of his love and devo­tion. Can Ibrahim (AS) pass this test ? He pon­ders on this unusu­al, rather cru­el, test. He has grown old and he has no oth­er off­spring. In his very old age, Allah has lis­tened to his prayer and has blessed him with this son through his sec­ond wife, Hajar. As a thanks­giv­ing for answer­ing to his prayer, he has named his son, Isma’ilMean­ing : God lis­tened [to my prayer].

Yet, Ibrahim (AS) was asked to set­tle Isma’il and his moth­er in the val­ley of Makkah when the child was still an infant. And now that the lad has become old enough to walk and rea­son, Allah wants him to sac­ri­fice that son to prove that his true love is only for Allah. Just pon­der on this for a momentQur’an 37:102. Don’t you get a chill in your back ? Satan tries to cre­ate doubt in his mind : O Ibrahim, are you sure you want to sac­ri­fice your son, your true love, your joy, the mean­ing of your exis­tence, the fruit of your life ; who would there be after you to wor­ship your Lord ; don’t you have heart, any soft feel­ings toward your son?’ Ibrahim (AS) is momen­tar­i­ly con­fused. Should he or shouldn’t he car­ry out Allah’s com­mand, you must sac­ri­fice your son?” Is he dream­ing or is it the real­i­ty ? No, there is no con­fu­sion what he saw in his vision is crys­tal clear ; God tru­ly wants him to sac­ri­fice his beloved Isma’il. He wins over Satan, the sneak­ing whis­per­er. But then Satan returns and tries to digress him from his task. Ibrahim (AS) wins over again. But Satan does not give up that eas­i­ly, he tries to cre­ate con­fu­sion for the third time. Ibrahim (AS) wins over Satan’s temp­ta­tions yet for the third time. He is men­tal­ly all pre­pared to car­ry out the task. His choice is obvi­ous – absolute obe­di­ence and devo­tion to Allah ; Isma’il must be sac­ri­ficed. He want­ed to share the mes­sage with his lad. Thus, he talks to his young lad, Isma’il (AS), of his dream and asks his opin­ion. And what does this gen­tle” son (whom the Qur’an calls Ghu­lamin Hal­im) reply ? He calm­ly says : O my father ! Do that which you are com­mand­ed. Allah will­ing, you shall find me of the stead­fast.”Qur’an, 37:102 He answers like the rock of Gibraltar !

What did you expect ? Did you expect the son of Ibrahim (AS), the upright, to be any less faith­ful than his father ? So, here in Mina, you act like Ibrahim (AS), the sol­dier of Tawhid (monothe­ism), ready to defeat, sub­due or shoot down your real ene­my, the Satan with­in you rep­re­sent­ing your per­son­al egos, desires, crav­ings, and pref­er­ences. These oth­er” things, the idols”, were dis­tract­ing you from the true wor­ship of God. But here in Mina, you are now ready to fight against these taghoots (demi-gods) to show your true devo­tion and obe­di­ence to Allah. You fight Satan just as Ibrahim (AS) had fought against him. To mim­ic that event, you throw stones at Satan at the three Jama­rats.

Udhiya (Qur­ban) or sac­ri­fice an ani­mal, say­ing only Bismillah.

When both the father and the son — Ibrahim and Isma’il (AS) — had sur­ren­dered to Allah and Ibrahim (AS) had flung Isma’il (AS) down upon his face and was about to put the knife on his son’s neck, Allah called Ibrahim (AS): O Ibrahim ! You have already ful­filled the vision.“Qur’an, 37:104 – 5 Ibrahim (AS) doesn’t have to sac­ri­fice his son. Instead, he should sac­ri­fice this ram, which has been sent to him, as ran­som for Isma’il (AS). Unlike the false-gods of poly­the­ism, Allah, the One True God, is not blood­thirsty. He just want­ed to check where Ibrahim (AS) stood in his devo­tion and love, whether he was capa­ble of over­com­ing his per­son­al feel­ing of love for his son to please Allah. A les­son was taught by Allah –- from now on there would be no human sac­ri­fice in the altar of God. Sac­ri­fice of a halal ani­mal whose meat you can eat and dis­trib­ute among the poor is a suf­fi­cient substitute.

Pon­der again. What was Ibrahim (AS) asked to sac­ri­fice ? It was noth­ing short of the most beloved thing/​entity among his pos­ses­sion. But when he was ready, his Isma’il was returned unto him, unscathed and unharmed. And he was made a mod­el for human­i­ty : And We left for him [Ibrahim (AS)] among the lat­er folk (the salu­ta­tion): Peace be unto Ibrahim. Thus do we reward the good.“Qur’an, 37:108 – 9 If you love some­thing more than you love Allah, then that thing has become your idol and you must be ready to sac­ri­fice that. Are you ready to slaugh­ter your world­ly desires, world­ly love, your Isma’il in Mina in order that you be free from all attach­ments save those of Allah ? If you are, then slaugh­ter a goat, sheep, ram, cow or camel as a ran­som towards your Isma’il. As Dr. Shariati right­ly puts it,

To offer a sheep instead of Isma’il is a sac­ri­fice”, but to sac­ri­fice a sheep just for the sake of sac­ri­fice is butch­ery”!Dr. Ali Shariati, Hajj : Reflec­tion on Its Rituals

For sure­ly Allah says, Their flesh and their blood do not reach Allah, but the devo­tion from you reach­es Him.”Qur’an, 22:37

Men should shave their head or trim their hair, at least, one-quar­ter of head. Women should not shave their head, but only trim slight­ly at the end of the lock of a hair.
After the Qur­ban (sac­ri­fice) of the ani­mal, you have almost com­plet­ed the basic require­ments of hajj, so you can make an end of your unkempt­nessQur’an, 22:29. You have defeat­ed Satan but you may not have suc­ceed­ed in com­plete­ly killing it. You may have defeat­ed him out­side but he comes back inside of you. So, you should stay the next three days in Mina and con­tin­ue with your bat­tling of the Satan at Jama­rat.

After shav­ing or trim­ming the hair, you should go to Makkah and make the Tawaf of vis­i­ta­tion and run sev­en times between the Safa and the Mar­wa. Then your hajj is com­plete and you can come out of Ihram.

This is the lat­ter tawaf of the Ka’baQur’an, 22:29, per­formed after you return from Mina. In Mina, you have defeat­ed Satan and renewed your ties with Allah by fol­low­ing the foot­steps of Ibrahim (AS). When you first approached Ka’ba you had not, by then, puri­fied your­self. You were still impure and uncon­scious. In Arafat you gained con­scious­ness. In Mina you puri­fied your­self. So, this is appro­pri­ate that you do the tawaf and sa’iy in the puri­fied state before you return home. Dur­ing the rit­u­als of hajj you played the roles of Ibrahim (AS) and Hajar. Do not replace your role-play­ing to some­thing else when you return. Like Hajar, always trust in Allah. Like Ibrahim (AS) fight the fire of Nim­rod, i.e., oppres­sion. Like Ibrahim (AS) be pre­pared to sac­ri­fice your Isma’il, i.e., love or desires, for the sake of your faith. That is the essence of hajj. You return to Allah the way He want­ed you to be : a slave total­ly ded­i­cat­ed to his/​her Master.

In clos­ing, let me quote from Ali bin Uth­man al-Jul­labi al Hujwiri’s (R) Kashf al-Mahjub. A cer­tain man came to Junayd [al-Bagh­da­di] (R). Junayd asked him whence he came. He replied : I have been to hajj.” Junayd (R) said : From the time when you first jour­neyed from your home have you also jour­neyed away from all sins?” He said, No.” Then,” said Junayd (R), you have made no jour­ney. At every stage where you halt­ed for the night did you tra­verse a sta­tion on the way to Allah?” He said : No.” Then,” said Junayd (R), you have not trod­den the road stage by stage. When you put on the Ihram (pilgrim’s garb) at the prop­er place did you dis­card the attrib­ut­es of human­i­ty as you cast off your ordi­nary clothes?” No.” Then you have not put on the Ihram. When you stood on Arafat did you stand one instant in con­tem­pla­tion of Allah?” No.” Then you have not stood on Arafat. When you went to Muz­dal­i­fa and achieved your desire did you renounce all sen­su­al desires?” No.” Then you have not gone to Muz­dal­i­fa. When you cir­cum­am­bu­lat­ed the Ka’ba did you behold the imma­te­r­i­al beau­ty of Allah in the abode of purifi­ca­tion?” No.” Then you have not cir­cum­am­bu­lat­ed the Ka’ba. When you ran between Safa and Mar­wa did you attain to the rank of safa (puri­ty) and muruwwat (virtue)?” No.” Then you have not run. When you came to Mina did all your wish­es cease?” No.” Then you have not yet vis­it­ed Mina. When you reached the slaugh­ter place and offered sac­ri­fice did you sac­ri­fice the objects of sen­su­al desire?” No.” Then you have not sac­ri­ficed. When you threw the stones did you throw away what­ev­er sen­su­al thoughts were accom­pa­ny­ing you?” No.” Then you have not yet thrown the stones, and you have not yet per­formed the pil­grim­age. Return and per­form the pil­grim­age in the man­ner which I have described in order that you may arrive at the sta­tion of Ibrahim (AS).”

May Allah grant us the vig­or to fol­low the dic­tates of hajj so that this duty is accept­able unto Him.

This essay is most­ly based on the book Hajj : Reflec­tion on Its Rit­u­als by Dr. Ali Shariati.


Published:

in

, ,

Author:

Tags:

Comments

12 responses to “The Soul of Hajj”

  1. Jane B. Drake Avatar

    I deeply regret sound­ing arro­gant in my pre­vi­ous posts. I believe there is no excuse for arro­gance, but per­haps I can explain it by sim­ply say­ing I have become very tired and there­fore care­less in my choice of words. I deeply regret it.

    I believe I’m tired” large­ly because it’s so hard to get peo­ple to stay on one sub­ject for even a few min­utes. I began my com­ments here by quot­ing Muham­mad’s urg­ing of believ­ers to draw no lines” between the Prophets-and I’m end­ing up read­ing the inter­est­ing – but com­plete­ly off the point – arti­cle men­tioned in the pre­vi­ous com­ment. No where in any of the three Holy Books is there any men­tion of the res­ur­rec­tion of the land the ancient Egyp­tian’s called Pales­tine.” But the res­ur­rec­tion of Israel is repeat­ed­ly men­tioned by the Prophets, and the gath­er­ing” of the Jews from all the nations where they were scat­tered.” We des­per­ate­ly need the mem­bers of all three reli­gions to alter their under­stand­ing. The Jews need to rec­og­nize the Mes­si­ah Jesus.” The Chris­tians need to rec­og­nize that the Mes­si­ah Jesus is a ser­vant of God,” as Muham­mad iden­ti­fied him, not God the Son.” And the Mus­lims need to rec­og­nize that they were nev­er meant to replace the Jews and Chris­tians, but to cor­rect the errors made by the Hebrew and Chrisit­ian cler­gies. I began this dis­cus­sion by sim­ply point­ing out that the Mus­lims could take the lead­ing role in trans­form­ing the world by believ­ing Muham­mad.” It’s evolved into an argu­ment” over mod­ern day Pales­tine, which has noth­ing to do with the Prophets.

  2. Mustafa Ali Avatar
    Mustafa Ali

    Assala­mu’a­lykum. It is ammus­ing to see such an intense and impas­sioned debate on Pales­tine and Israel under the arti­cle, The Soul of Hajj. Regard­less, it was great to observe three views on this press­ing issue. I com­mend Abdur Rah­man, Al-Qur’an wa Sun­nah, and Jane B. Drake for par­tic­i­pat­ing in such a vital dis­course. I agree most with AR and AQWS. Jane B. Drake, I believe is a gen­uine­ly good heart­ed per­son. I agree with her aspi­ra­tions of peace and mutu­al har­mo­ny. How­ev­er, I found noth­ing in the argu­ments of the oth­ers that went con­trary to her exalt­ed ideals. I do not believe any­one was advo­cat­ing vio­lence. I real­ly appre­ci­at­ed AR’s and AQWS use of sub­stan­tial his­tor­i­cal evi­dence, and their arug­ments that serve as effi­ca­cious refu­ta­tions that get at the core of the strife. I did not appre­ci­ate Jane’s arro­gance towards the infor­ma­tion, sta­tis­tics, etc… pro­vid­ed. As AQWS said, it did seem that she was being dis­mis­sive of oth­ers and mak­ing their argu­ments obso­lete.” The last com­ment by AQWS real­ly hits the heart of this alter­ca­tion. I will not pre­sume to con­tin­ue out of fear that my speech may become obso­lete” by Jane B. Drake. How­ev­er, If I am gratned per­mis­sion I wish to impart a worth­while study by Habib Sid­diqui which can be accessed at http://​www​.pales​tine​-pmc​.com/​d​e​t​a​i​l​s​.​a​s​p​?​c​a​t​=​3&​i​d​=​806. I kind­ly advise every­one to read that arti­cle and learn more about the Palestinian/​Israel con­flict. I hope we no do not have any fur­ther com­ments that lack sound evi­dence to prove an argu­ment. So if any­one is against what I have writ­ten, please take the time to read that arti­cle. Thank you for your time and patience. I pray that Allah, Lord of all that exists, grants us a solu­tion to this world dille­ma in the near future.

  3. Al-Qur'aan wa Sunnah Avatar
    Al-Qur'aan wa Sunnah

    You’re not lis­tent­ing, you nev­er have and you nev­er will. I’m sure you heard the hog­wash state­ments many times, and I’m also sure that you nev­er stud­ied the issues your­self to eval­u­ate the claims as either true or false. You just don’t want to believe it because it goes against what you stand for, uni­fied faiths for a ter­ror­ist state of Israel. All this talk about turn­ing our hearts to one anoth­er, what hap­pened to turn­ing our hearts towards inno­cent pales­tini­ans, vic­tims of a oppres­sive régime. You my friend are also inter­pret­ing your verse as you see fit. You are doing what you appar­ent­ly detest. Saddly, I am going to avoid respond­ing to you again because you are stub­born, read this— The recent esca­la­tion and cri­sis in Pales­tine, aris­ing from a dis­pro­por­tion­ate Israeli response to an Israeli sol­dier being tak­en as a hostage’ by armed Pales­tini­ans has re-focussed inter­na­tion­al atten­tion on the area, whilst par­tial­ly rel­e­gat­ing media focus on Iraq.

    The con­flict has also brought pub­lic focus again on the con­tin­ued debate over the legal­i­ty of the cre­ation and exis­tence of Israel despite the claims of efforts towards a two-state solu­tion. The pen­du­lum grav­i­tates between rejec­tion of the Israeli state, a view inter­est­ing­ly not only held by Mus­lims, but also Chris­tians and a num­ber of Jews ; and between its legit­i­ma­cy lent to it by its colo­nial cre­ators that is imposed and pro­tect­ed by region­al tyrant rulers over the Mus­lims and an ever-present Israeli military.

    60 years of exis­tence as a state has been asso­ci­at­ed with 60 years of argu­ments and strug­gle. How­ev­er, the essence of the debate has become delib­er­ate­ly lost in trans­la­tion and side-tracked by the absurd asser­tion that being anti-state of Israel and/​or anti-Zion­ist is syn­ony­mous to being anti-Jew and anti-Semit­ic. Sub­se­quent­ly, much legit­i­mate polit­i­cal debate and expres­sion has been hijacked with this false, disin­gen­u­ous, emo­tive, decep­tive and irrel­e­vant connection.

    To avoid falling into this trap and be false­ly labelled — so that we can focus on a mean­ing­ful per­spec­tive on whether the state of Israel has a right to exist, let us go direct­ly to remove the imped­i­ment and red-her­ring : The asser­tion that being anti-Israel and/​or anti-Zion­ist is syn­ony­mous to being anti-Jew and anti-Semit­ic is absurd, disin­gen­u­ous and a con­cert­ed delib­er­ate attempt to sti­fle legit­i­mate polit­i­cal views that argue the ille­git­i­ma­cy of the Israeli state and the fun­da­men­tal right to oppose it.”

    As for the core dis­cus­sion about the legit­i­ma­cy of Israel as a state, it con­nect­ed to four claims — Eth­i­cal, His­tor­i­cal, Reli­gious and Political.

    Eth­i­cal

    There is no eth­i­cal basis for the legit­i­ma­cy of Israel, since it was sim­ply uneth­i­cal and immoral to dis­place a pop­u­la­tion forcibly from their lands, con­vert­ing them to refugees with­out mean­ing, then ter­rorise them to accept the ille­gal acqui­si­tion of their lands. We would assume by the twist­ed log­ic of con­sid­er­ing it eth­i­cal to force a pop­u­la­tion to leave their homes, pos­ses­sions and lands that this would make Pres­i­dent Mugabe pol­i­cy in Zim­bab­we of forced evic­tion of whites’ accept­able ? It would also make it eth­i­cal for some­one to enter Bush’s Tex­as­’s Ranch, force him out and claim the ranch for him­self, pos­si­bly leav­ing Bush with the barn and to accept this, mak­ing the barn his home and being pre­vent­ed to take appro­pri­ate actions to claim all of the ranch back ?

    We don’t think so and doubt this would be con­sid­ered eth­i­cal and moral… and nei­ther was it evi­dent when Argenti­na sought to claim the Falk­land Islands and the British gov­ern­ment respond­ed in April 1982, under the lead­er­ship of Mar­garet Thatch­er, by fight­ing Argenti­na in the Falk­lands War to keep it under British rule. Let us also keep a per­spec­tive on this — the Falk­land Islands only has a pop­u­la­tion of 3,000 in com­par­i­son to Pales­tine which has a pop­u­la­tion 4 mil­lion (exclud­ing those forced to flee to neigh­bour­ing Jor­dan and those absorbed into Israel). Giv­en Britain’s expe­ri­ence on giv­ing Pales­tine away from her man­date to a for­eign peo­ple, why was this prece­dent not applied to the Falk­lands and the islands giv­en to Argenti­na (who have his­tor­i­cal claim to the islands)? Was this an uneth­i­cal action by the British gov­ern­ment not to give the Falk­lands Islands, like they did with Pales­tine ? Giv­en that there is dis­cus­sion amongst British politi­cians to com­mem­o­rate the Falk­lands war, clear­ly Britain does­n’t believe so. There­fore, if the British can fight to lib­er­ate a small rel­a­tive­ly insignif­i­cant island from occu­pa­tion to safe­guard its pop­u­la­tion (and com­mem­o­rate this), then why can­not the Pales­tini­ans do the same and repel the ille­gal occu­pa­tion of their lands ?

    What is uneth­i­cal is not the posi­tion of the Pales­tini­ans to strug­gle for the lib­er­a­tion of all the occu­pied lands, but the hyp­o­crit­i­cal dou­ble stan­dards of the west­ern powers.

    His­tor­i­cal

    The his­tor­i­cal argu­ment that is fre­quent­ly quot­ed is often con­nect­ed to the eth­i­cal angle. As for the his­tor­i­cal claim, it stems from the view that the ances­tors of the Jews were the first to inhab­it the plains of Pales­tine ; there­fore this grants them the right to the land. This was a sim­i­lar argu­ment, was it not, that Iraq held con­cern­ing Kuwait ? Sure­ly the colo­nial pow­ers should have sup­port­ed Iraq when it entered Kuwait in 1990 based on Iraq’s his­tor­i­cal claim (more so since Sad­dam was a west­ern agent), sim­i­lar to when they sup­port­ed the Zion­ist his­tor­i­cal claim to Israel and paved the way for the Zion­ists to achieve this aim ? On the con­trary, whilst the Pales­tini­ans were forcibly evict­ed to make way for the Zion­ist enti­ty, Iraq’s entry into Kuwait pre­cip­i­tat­ed the Gulf War. There­fore it should be not­ed that the his­tor­i­cal argu­ment is not only weak, which we will endeav­our to sum­marise lat­er, but suf­fers from the same illog­i­cal dou­ble stan­dards. For the sake of com­ple­tion of argu­ment, if one fol­lows the log­ic of this argu­ment, then the fol­low­ing exam­ples of his­tor­i­cal claims should be equal­ly applied, with equal res­o­lu­tion, force and deter­mi­na­tion to return land to its orig­i­nal inhabitants :

    a) Lands in Amer­i­ca returned to the native Indians
    When the Euro­peans land­ed, there were prob­a­bly about 10 mil­lion Indi­ans pop­u­lat­ing Amer­i­ca north of present-day Mex­i­co. It is believed that the first Indi­ans arrived dur­ing the last ice-age, approx­i­mate­ly 20,000 — 30,000 years ago. The ini­tial enthu­si­asm with which the Indi­ans greet­ed the Euro­peans soon turned to con­flict due to the Euro­pean colo­nial mate­r­i­al greed. The con­flicts led to the Indi­an Wars, the Indi­an Removal Act and oth­er acts cul­mi­nat­ing in the last major war, which was the mas­sacre in 1890 of Indi­an war­riors, women, and chil­dren at Wound­ed Knee, South Dako­ta. From a peri­od of a bru­tal pol­i­cy of forced assim­i­la­tion that last­ed until the 1960’s, aside from token ges­ture Indi­an reser­va­tions, native Indi­ans until today have been denied their right to re-pos­sess their ances­tral lands

    b) Lands in Aus­tralia returned to the native Aborigines
    From 1788, when the British offi­cial­ly land­ed, until today force (mil­i­tary and oth­er­wise) has been used to strip the native Abo­rig­i­nal peo­ple of their lands. The Abo­rig­i­nal peo­ple fought to pro­tect their lands but the British declared this con­ti­nent ter­ra nul­lius — that the land was emp­ty and belonged to no-one when they colonised it. For over 200 years the lie of ter­ra nul­lius was the cru­el and bru­tal cov­er for the mass mur­der, for the refusal to recog­nise Aus­trali­a’s indige­nous race as peo­ple, for the forced removal of chil­dren from their fam­i­lies, for the inhu­man exploita­tion of the labour of Abo­rig­i­nal peo­ple, for the racist treat­ment and apartheid Abo­rig­i­nal peo­ple have been sub­ject­ed to. Ter­ra Nul­lius was also the jus­ti­fi­ca­tion for the denial of land rights. Though in 1992, the High Court of Aus­tralia recog­nised the con­cept of Native Title, stat­ing it had exist­ed before set­tle­ment and had con­tin­ued after coloni­sa­tion. How­ev­er, the court adjudged that the Native Title was extin­guished when­ev­er land had been sold or set aside for some oth­er pur­pose. Lit­tle has changed since then.

    What we clear­ly wit­ness in the above two exam­ples is a repug­nant dis­guised pol­i­cy of dis­crim­i­na­tion, denial of land return and polit­i­cal author­i­ty upon those peo­ple with legit­i­mate his­tor­i­cal claims (except Israel, of course). There­fore, pos­sess­ing an his­tor­i­cal right car­ries nei­ther val­ue nor worth as a basis of argu­ment. So why is Israel made an excep­tion ? Clear­ly, the his­tor­i­cal argu­ments are flawed and selec­tive­ly applied — but this is typ­i­cal from an inter­na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty that is hostage to polit­i­cal expe­di­en­cy and estab­lished upon the evil ide­ol­o­gy of cap­i­tal­ism that serves the prime inter­ests of the capitalists.

    Where does this leave the Zion­ist his­tor­i­cal claim, aside from being mean­ing­less and irrel­e­vant ? A brief review on the his­to­ry of Pales­tine reveals two inter­est­ing points. First­ly, that the his­to­ry is dis­put­ed, so there is no clear proof of the Zion­ist claim any­way. Sec­ond­ly, most his­to­ri­ans con­clude the Canaan­ites were the ear­li­est known inhab­i­tants of Pales­tine (3rd mil­len­ni­um BC). The Canaan­ites were the ear­li­est known inhab­i­tants of Pales­tine (3rd mil­len­ni­um BC). Egypt was the first adja­cent pow­er to con­quer the region (3rd mil­len­ni­um BC). Dur­ing the 2nd mil­len­ni­um BC Egypt­ian hege­mo­ny and Canaan­ite auton­o­my were chal­lenged by var­i­ous invaders – and only then did the Israelites’ appear (Semit­ic tribes from Mesopotamia). There­fore, even the Zion­ist his­tor­i­cal claims are at least unproven and at best a delib­er­ate contortion.

    Reli­gious

    Polit­i­cal­ly, Pales­tine holds no sig­nif­i­cance for Jews – since like Chris­tian­i­ty, Judaism does not pos­sess nor artic­u­late a polit­i­cal struc­ture, insti­tu­tions or process­es to deal with state and society.

    How­ev­er, it is clear that Judaism has been hijacked by the Zion­ist move­ment, which has tak­en Juda­ic prin­ci­ples and ideals and fused them with­in a cap­i­tal­ist and ruth­less polit­i­cal agen­da that dreams of a greater Israel’ – whilst accord­ing to the Torah, the Jews are for­bid­den to have their own state or polit­i­cal sov­er­eign­ty while await­ing the mes­sian­ic era. To this end, the reli­gious argu­ment and jus­ti­fi­ca­tion is false and is best rep­re­sent­ed by Jews themselves.

    A num­ber of ortho­dox Jews, like the Neturei Kar­ta, state their refusal to, “…recog­nise the right of any­one to estab­lish a Jew­ish” state dur­ing the present peri­od of exile.” They oppose the, “…so-called State of Israel” not because it oper­ates sec­u­lar­ly, but because the entire con­cept of a sov­er­eign Jew­ish state is con­trary to Jew­ish Law.”

    Quot­ing the Tal­mud, Ortho­dox Jews refer to Trac­tate Kesu­b­os (p. 111a), stat­ing that it teach­es that Jews shall not use human force to bring about the estab­lish­ment of a Jew­ish state before the com­ing of the uni­ver­sal­ly accept­ed Moshi­ach (Mes­si­ah from the House of David).

    The likes of Neturei Kar­ta fur­ther aim to dis­tance Judaism from Zion­ism by stat­ing, The true Jews remain faith­ful to Jew­ish belief and are not con­t­a­m­i­nat­ed with Zion­ism.” Like­wise they, deplore the sys­tem­at­ic uproot­ing of ancient Jew­ish com­mu­ni­ties by the Zion­ists, the shed­ding of Jew­ish and non-Jew­ish blood for the sake of Zion­ist sov­er­eign­ty,” and that, The world must know that the Zion­ists have ille­git­i­mate­ly seized the name Israel and have no right to speak in the name of the Jew­ish people!”

    There­fore, we would safe­ly con­clude that there is no reli­gious basis for the exis­tence of the state of Israel. We won­der whether ortho­dox Jews who espouse these views are chas­tised, tried and impris­oned by west­ern gov­ern­ments for pro­mot­ing such views and labelled as anti-Semit­ic’ or impris­oned for hold­ing ter­ror­ist’ views on the destruc­tion of Israel ? We don’t think this is the case, since the likes of Neturei Kar­ta hold year round glob­al demon­stra­tions, includ­ing in New York and Lon­don — with plac­ards, which if held by Mus­lims – they would be instant­ly arrest­ed and tried under racial/​religious dis­crim­i­na­tion laws or some ter­ror legislation.

    Polit­i­cal

    The devel­op­ment of Pales­tine in con­tem­po­rary polit­i­cal his­to­ry has three dis­tinct peri­ods, which are : first­ly, under Islam­ic rule ; sec­ond­ly, under the British Man­date from 1922, by the League of Nations ; and final­ly under Israeli rule. With­out any shad­ow of doubt, only under the rule of Islam did the peo­ple (Mus­lims, Jews and Chris­tians) find great lev­els of secu­ri­ty, sta­bil­i­ty and ease. It is well doc­u­ment­ed, by non-Mus­lim his­to­ri­ans, that Jews sought refuge under the Islam­ic author­i­ty, the Khi­lafah, from per­se­cu­tion in Europe, par­tic­u­lar­ly the infa­mous Span­ish Inqui­si­tion in 1492.

    As for British rule, in 1922, Pales­tine was placed, by the League of Nations, under British Man­date until 1948, when the state of Israel was estab­lished. Dur­ing this man­date, all the peo­ple, par­tic­u­lar­ly the Arabs suf­fered at the hands of a dis­crim­i­na­to­ry pol­i­cy that enact­ed laws assist­ing Jew­ish immi­gra­tion to Pales­tine and acqui­si­tion of land by Jews. Dur­ing this time, the local Arab pop­u­la­tion (Mus­lims and Chris­tians), dis­mayed that they were being slow­ly swamped in their own coun­try by for­eign immi­grants, rose more than once in revolt against the immi­gra­tion pol­i­cy of the British Government.

    As for Israeli rule since 1948, lit­tle needs to be said about the apartheid, bru­tal, dis­crim­i­na­to­ry and racist nature of the state – both against the Muslim/​Christian Arab pop­u­la­tions (in Israel and the Pales­tin­ian refugee camps) and against Jews them­selves of Ori­en­tal and African descent. A num­ber of doc­u­ments by Amnesty Inter­na­tion­al and Human Rights Watch re-affirm what the world has wit­nessed for 60 years of the bru­tal dis­re­gard of human life and bla­tant dis­crim­i­na­tion, result­ing in the con­sis­tent ten­sion for the region as a whole. There­fore, polit­i­cal­ly, Israel will nev­er pro­vide a basis for polit­i­cal sta­bil­i­ty in the region giv­en its innate racist phi­los­o­phy, Zion­ist polit­i­cal agen­da and sus­tained oppo­si­tion from a peo­ple that have been forcibly dis­placed and will con­tin­ue to work for the com­plete lib­er­a­tion of Pales­tine from Zion­ist and colo­nial control.

    In con­clu­sion, the legit­i­ma­cy of Israel is estab­lished upon deceit, dis­hon­esty and hypocrisy. It real­i­ty it has no legit­i­ma­cy and the eth­i­cal, his­tor­i­cal, reli­gious and polit­i­cal claims are false and twist­ed. The occu­pied peo­ple of Pales­tine have the legal right to oppose occu­pa­tion and strive for the com­plete lib­er­a­tion of Pales­tine. This is a right for the peo­ple of Pales­tine ; a right that exists for eth­i­cal, his­tor­i­cal, reli­gious and polit­i­cal rea­sons – unlike the false rea­sons that the pro­po­nents of Israel have claimed.

    Source : KCom Journal

  4. Jane B. Drake Avatar

    I believe in the Lord God of Abra­ham, as He is revealed by all the Prophets from Abra­ham through Muham­mad. There­fore, I also believe in the Mes­si­ah Jesus,” as Muham­mad iden­ti­fies him. And I believe in the promis­es God has pro­vid­ed for His images, includ­ing the promise con­veyed by Jesus, who told us that some­day, God’s images will do greater things” than he did when he lived on earth.

    My desire is to help us avoid the gross dark­ness” of a nuclear win­ter, as the Prophet Isa­iah pre­cise­ly described it. To avoid the dark­ness”, the Prophet Malachi said we must turn our hearts to each oth­er. Believ­ers can­not turn our hearts to oth­ers unless we learn about God and our Mes­si­ah from all the Prophets.

    Hav­ing lived 79 years, I’ve heard more than enough of the man­made hog­wash” that has been said — espe­cial­ly these days — that con­tra­dict or nul­li­fy God’s promis­es. For any­one to take it upon him­self to alter God’s promis­es appears to me to be the epit­o­me of igno­rance. I’ve writ­ten a book, and main­tain a web­site and a blog pre­sent­ing the com­bined teach­ings of all the Prophets. And I read­i­ly dis­cuss sub­jects with any­one who will do so civil­ly. But I am not inclined to dis­cuss the last com­ment, sug­gest­ing that I lis­ten to peo­ple who have no respect for the Sacred Teach­ings of the Prophets, as they have been pre­served and passed down to us. They are our ONLY source of knowl­edge about God. Every­thing else is pure imag­i­na­tion by humans who know not what they do.”