Polem­i­cal Rebuttals

Resolv­ing The Chris­t­ian​“I‑Know-Noth­ing” Mul­ti-Prob­lem In Tex­tu­al Criticism

Occa­sion­al­ly, we come across Chris­tians face-to-face and, more fre­quent­ly, on the Inter­net, who, when informed that the text of the gospels under­went cor­rup­tion dur­ing their trans­mis­sion, often react with the fol­low­ing type of ques­tions : When ? Who did the cor­rup­tion ? In what coun­try ? Before or after Muham­mad ? Why was it done ? How come no one noticed it?” These type of seem­ing­ly inno­cent” ques­tions mere­ly reveal the incal­cu­la­bly colos­sal igno­rance of the per­son in question.

In This Category

Does​“Musi’un” Mean​“Expand­ing”?

Intro­duc­tion It has come to our atten­tion that Avi­jit Roy, web­mas­ter of the Muk­to Mona web­site, wrote an arti­cle titled Does the Qur’an Have any…

Christoph Heger’s Prob­lem­at­ic​“Recon­struc­tion” Of The Qur’an­ic Sura 96

In an arti­cle of his, Christoph Heger has ven­tured to uncov­er what he insin­u­at­ed as the pre-Islam­ic ground lay­er of an orig­i­nal­ly Chris­t­ian text…

Refu­ta­tion of P.N. Oak’s Claims Against The Ka’bah

Some researcher” known as P. N. Oak has come up with some ludi­crous, puerile and absurd com­ments regard­ing Islam. His the­o­ry pos­tu­lat­ing the…

Wood Chopped Down : The Infor­ma­tion Super­high­way and the Non­sense of Chris­t­ian Mis­sion­ary Belligerence

From the begin­ning of Ori­en­tal­ism, the Chris­t­ian mis­sion­ar­ies have been assum­ing that Islam is head­less” enough to be attacked and scru­ti­nised with a feroc­i­ty that one can only con­clude bor­ders on fanati­cism. These mis­sion­ar­ies proved then that they don’t have the brains to acknowl­edge their own headless­ness. One such exam­ple is David Wood, a recent zeal­ous recruit by the ever-intol­erent Answer­ing Islam, whose only amaz­ing abil­i­ty is his extreme bel­liger­ence, and what can only be described as fanat­i­cal intol­er­ence, towards a faith dif­fer­ent from his. This is a review of one such arti­cle.

Myths and Facts About the Banu Qurayzah

The Chris­t­ian mis­sion­ar­ies have been mak­ing a lot of noise about the cir­cum­stances sur­round­ing the Banu Qurayzah. It is a won­der that even after…

Lux­en­berg On Houris

If the Qur’an­ic vers­es men­tion­ing houris are care­ful­ly placed and crit­i­cal­ly stud­ied in the order of their rev­e­la­tion, then the fol­low­ing pic­ture emerges –…

Vir­gins of Par­adise” in Christianity

It has already point­ed out pre­vi­ous­ly that the Ara­bic word hur al-ayn” (houris), mean­ing a beau­ti­ful, volup­tuous woman, was already well known in the…

Is Islam A Monotheism ?

The fol­low­ing is a reply made by an Arab broth­er using the nick­name sary” in response to Christoph Heger’s polemic about the uncre­at­ed­ness of…

The Chris­t­ian Mis­sion­ar­ies and the​“Mys­tery” of Peace Be Upon Him

There is a com­mon claim cir­cu­lat­ed in Chris­t­ian Arab cir­cles with regard to the beatif­ic phrase sal­lal­lahu alay­hi was-sal­lam which comes as an eulo­gy to the Prophet’s name. It was first prop­a­gat­ed in the Eng­lish-speak­ing world by the Chris­t­ian Arab mis­sion­ary, Anis Shorrosh, who claims that this eulo­gy does not lit­er­al­ly mean peace be upon him” but occurs in the Quran­ic text” and : …lit­er­al­ly reads, Lo ! Allah and His angels pray upon the prophet. Oh yea who believe, pray on him and salute him with peace.” In the usu­al vein of mis­sion­ary tra­di­tion, Shorrosh goes on to take the oppor­tu­ni­ty to blas­pheme and make mock­ery of Allah(T) by accus­ing Him of pray­ing[!] to a sub­ject, but we shall not both­er to cite fur­ther from his blas­phe­mous work. Oth­er Chris­t­ian Arab polemi­cists such as Labib Mikhail and the pseu­do­ny­mous Abdul­lah Al-Ara­by soon fol­lowed suit.

Ara­bic Bible​“Cal­lig­ra­phy”: Expres­sion of Art or Evi­dence for Deception ?

The Chris­t­ian mis­sion­ar­ies are well-known for their decep­tion in order to spread their so-called God-giv­en” pur­pose to spread the Gospel to the world. This approach is not alien to the mis­sion­ary agen­da, for it is found­ed upon the very words of Paul, who laid down decep­tion as the mis­sion­ary approach. It is with this mis­sion” in mind that they have start­ed to infil­trate coun­tries where the major­i­ty of Mus­lims do not habit­u­al­ly read or speak Ara­bic. The mis­sion­ar­ies have begun sell­ing images which mir­rors the cal­lig­ra­phy often found in Qur’an­ic vers­es, but instead of the usu­al Qur’an­ic vers­es, they cite vers­es from the Ara­bic Bible instead. This tru­ly dis­plays the decep­tion of the mis­sion­ar­ies in order to dupe gullible Mus­lims to their cause.

Chris­t­ian Mis­sion­ar­ies Sweep­ing the Islam­ic World

From a tape lec­ture of the same title, Les­son 66. Edit­ed by Mohd Elfie Nieshaem Juferi Let us first dis­cuss some of the new ways…

Deal­ing With Anti-Islam­ic Websites

One of the down­sides of the Inter­net is that it has giv­en our crit­ics and ene­mies an oppor­tu­ni­ty to pub­licly defame the reli­gion of…

The Mys­te­ri­ous Hazor Stat­ue : The​“Allah” of the Muslims ?

For years the Chris­t­ian mis­sion­ar­ies have been enter­tain­ing the idea that Allah” of the Qur’an was in fact a pagan Arab moon god” of pre-Islam­ic times. This the­o­ry was first pop­u­larised by a fanat­i­cal, mid-West­ern clos­et-fas­cist polemi­cist by the name of Dr. Robert Morey, of which his decep­tive meth­ods have already been exposed in the past. The fol­low­ing page is found in Appen­dix C : The Moon God And Archael­o­gy” from Morey’s The Islam­ic Inva­sion and lies at the heart of the mis­sion­ary pro­pa­gan­da today.

Mis­sion­ary VS Ter­ror­ist : An Exam­i­na­tion of a Mis­sion­ary’s Men­tal Imbal­ance and Behav­iour­ial Problem

The recent bar­rage of mis­sion­ary demen­tia gives us a mar­velous oppor­tu­ni­ty to expose the char­ac­ter of the mis­sion­ary Sam Shamoun, his men­tal dis­or­der and the extremes he is will­ing to under­take in order to unleash his abus­es and prej­u­dice towards Mus­lims. Indeed, he con­vinc­ing­ly demon­strates that he is a con­firmed Islam­o­phobe. The dis­cus­sion is con­cern­ing the use of the term mis­sion­ary”. The mis­sion­ary claims that we should not refer to him as a mis­sion­ary because even though he is a mis­sion­ary, many Mus­lims nev­er­the­less have alleged neg­a­tive” views con­cern­ing the title mis­sion­ary” accord­ing to his opin­ion. Hence he argues that we are mak­ing an ad hominem attack against him every time we right­ful­ly call him a mis­sion­ary. He claims that his argu­ments will be alleged­ly dis­missed before­hand by Mus­lims when they find out that he is a missionary.

Nurs­ing of Adults and Per­vert­ed Mis­sion­ary Mentality

In accor­dance with clas­si­cal mis­sion­ary habits, the Chris­t­ian mis­sion­ary Sam Shamoun — who is noto­ri­ous for his per­vert­ed and filthy mis­in­ter­pre­ta­tions — has taken…

Lat­est articles

Nabeel Qureshi (1983 – 2017): The Shock­ing Truth Behind a Man­u­fac­tured​“Ex-Mus­lim” Martyr

Nabeel Qureshi died at the age of 34 years old in 2017 from a rare and dead­ly form of stom­ach can­cer” on 16th of Sep­tem­ber 2017 with mixed reactions. 

Paul Says That Mark Is Futile : No Res­ur­rec­tion In Mark’s Gospel

But the first of the four gospels, i.e., the Gospel accord­ing to Mark, appar­ent­ly did not receive Paul’s memo. And this is a very impor­tant point as we keep in mind that each of the gospels were ini­tial­ly divorced from each oth­er and were writ­ten in dif­fer­ent local­i­ties for dif­fer­ent audiences.

The Gospels’ Accounts Regard­ing the Call of the First Disciples

So which is the cor­rect Gospel account con­cern­ing the choice of Jesus’ first apos­tles ? The fol­low­ing Bible con­tra­dic­tion was extract­ed from an unpub­lished the­sis enti­tled Ibn Hazm On The Doc­trine of Tahrif which cites Kitab al-Fasl fi al-Milal wa al-Ahwa’ wa al-Nihal and insha’allah this will be part of an ongo­ing series to repro­duce extracts of Ibn Hazm’s crit­i­cisms of the Bible and Christianity.