Tag : Chris­t­ian Missionaries

The Qur’an Can­not Be A Text of Divine Origin

The Chris­t­ian mis­sion­ar­ies tend to make the gen­er­al con­clu­sion that the Qur’an can­not be a text of divine ori­gin because of the unac­cept­able mean­ings includ­ed in it.Perhaps they are cor­rect in this con­clu­sion and we may be inclined to agree with them due to the fol­low­ing reasons.

Wood Chopped Down : The Infor­ma­tion Super­high­way and the Non­sense of Chris­t­ian Mis­sion­ary Belligerence

From the begin­ning of Ori­en­tal­ism, the Chris­t­ian mis­sion­ar­ies have been assum­ing that Islam is ​“head­less” enough to be attacked and scru­ti­nised with a feroc­i­ty that one can only con­clude bor­ders on fanati­cism. These mis­sion­ar­ies proved then that they don’t have the brains to acknowl­edge their own headless­ness. One such exam­ple is David Wood, a recent zeal­ous recruit by the ever-intol­erent Answer­ing Islam, whose only amaz­ing abil­i­ty is his extreme bel­liger­ence, and what can only be described as fanat­i­cal intol­er­ence, towards a faith dif­fer­ent from his. This is a review of one such arti­cle.

The Mys­te­ri­ous Hazor Stat­ue : The​“Allah” of the Muslims ?

For years the Chris­t­ian mis­sion­ar­ies have been enter­tain­ing the idea that ​“Allah” of the Qur’an was in fact a pagan Arab ​“moon god” of pre-Islam­ic times. This the­o­ry was first pop­u­larised by a fanat­i­cal, mid-West­ern clos­et-fas­cist polemi­cist by the name of Dr. Robert Morey, of which his decep­tive meth­ods have already been exposed in the past. The fol­low­ing page is found in ​“Appen­dix C : The Moon God And Archael­o­gy” from Morey’s The Islam­ic Inva­sion and lies at the heart of the mis­sion­ary pro­pa­gan­da today.

Lat­est articles

Did al-Zuṭṭ Ride Muham­mad ? A Crit­i­cal Philo­log­i­cal Reassess­ment of a Mod­ern Anti-Islam Polemic

Polem­i­cal Rebuttals Mohd Elfie Nieshaem Juferi -
This study dis­man­tles the al-zuṭṭ hadith polemic through close read­ing, lex­i­cog­ra­phy, and nar­ra­tive con­trol. By restor­ing con­text to yark­abūn, exam­in­ing trans­mis­sion vari­ants, and com­par­ing Semit­ic par­al­lels, it shows how innu­en­do trans­la­tion exploits pol­y­se­my, sup­press­es clo­sure, and man­u­fac­tures scan­dal with­out his­tor­i­cal war­rant with­in dis­ci­plined philol­o­gy and sober method­olog­i­cal lim­its alone here

State of Flux : Con­test­ed Doc­trines in Ear­ly Christianity

Chris­tian­i­ty Mohd Elfie Nieshaem Juferi -
Ear­ly Chris­tian­i­ty lacked a sin­gle, uni­fied the­ol­o­gy. This arti­cle shows how lat­er ​“ortho­doxy” emerged through his­tor­i­cal con­sol­i­da­tion rather than orig­i­nal consensus.

The Death of Muham­mad ﷺ : Poi­son, Prophet­hood, and the Mis­read­ing of Sources

Polem­i­cal Rebuttals Mohd Elfie Nieshaem Juferi -
The death of Muham­mad ﷺ exam­ined through Qur’anic lan­guage, hadith con­text, and his­to­ry, expos­ing how poi­son claims rely on mis­read­ing sources.

Follow us on:

About bismika allahuma

Bismika Allahuma: Muslim Responses To Anti-Islam Polemics is dedicated to Muslim apologetics and responses to Christian missionary efforts and Christian apologetics. We address and refute common misrepresentations of Islam, largely spread by Christian missionaries, Christian polemicists, and their Islamophobic allies who actively promote Islamophobia. Through scholarly analysis and well-reasoned arguments, we respond to attacks on Islam by figures such as David Wood, Hassamo Shamoun, Nabeel Qureshi, and Robert Spencer, along with anti-Islamic platforms like Answering Islam, Ali Sina, and Jihad Watch. Bismika Allahuma’s commitment to Islamic apologetics defends Islam’s integrity and encourages informed, respectful discourse. Join us in advancing a truthful and balanced understanding of Islam in today’s global discourse.

© 2003–2025 Bismika Allahuma: Muslim Responses to Anti-Islam Polemics. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Privacy Policy. Independent and non-sponsored.